Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010034
Original file (20080010034.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        06 JANUARY 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080010034 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) dated 26 March 1971 be corrected to reflect in block 17c. that he entered active duty on 27 September 1967.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 dated 26 March 1971 incorrectly reflects that he entered active duty on 30 June 1968, when in fact he entered active duty on 27 September 1967.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 dated 26 March 1971 and a copy of his record of assignment from his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in Minneapolis, Minnesota on 27 September 1967 for a period of 3 years.  He completed his basic training at Fort Campbell, Kentucky and his advanced individual training as a field artillery rocket crewman at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, before being transferred to Germany on 23 June 1968.

3.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 29 June 1968 and was honorably discharged on the same date for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  He was issued a DD Form 214 covering his service from 27 September 1967 to 29 June 1968.  He had served 9 months and 3 days of total active service.

4.  On 30 June 1968, he reenlisted for a period of 3 years in the pay grade of     E-4.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 1 November 1969 and he remained in Germany until he was transferred to Fort Dix, New Jersey and was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 26 March 1971, for the purpose of attending school (Early Release).  He had served 2 years, 8 months and 27 days of active service during his current enlistment for a total of 3 years and 6 months of total active service.  His DD Form 214 reflects that he entered active duty on 30 June 1968. 

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, provided that a DD Form 214 would be issued to cover each enlistment or period of induction.  DD Forms 214 were required to be issued upon discharge for immediate reenlistment, REFRAD and discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 does not accurately reflect the date he entered active duty has been noted and found to lack merit.  

2.  The applicant did enlist on 27 September 1967 and served until he was honorably discharged on 29 June 1968, for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  He was issued a DD Form 214 at the time of his discharge to reflect his service up until that date.

3.  He reenlisted on 30 June 1968 and served until he was honorably REFRAD as an early out to attend school on 26 March 1971, at which time he was issued another DD Form 214 to cover that period of service and to reflect the previous 9 months and 3 days he had served during his previous enlistment.

4.  Accordingly, his DD Form 214 dated 26 March 1971 was prepared in accordance with the applicable regulations in effect at the time and the applicant has failed to show any basis to correct the DD Form 214 that was issued to him.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




      _______ _XXX   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010034





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010034



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000652

    Original file (20140000652.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. He was honorably discharged on 14 July 1968 and would have been issued a DD Form 214 at that time that reflected his Vietnam service. Therefore, it appears that there is no error or injustice in his case and no basis to grant his request to add his Vietnam service on a DD Form 214 of a different period.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014473

    Original file (20080014473.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 16 May 1972, be corrected to show that he entered active duty on 15 September 1967. On 22 May 1968, he reenlisted for a period of 4 years and training as a welder. The applicant reenlisted on 22 May 1968 for a period of 4 years and his DD Form 214 correctly reflects that he entered on the period of service covered by the DD Form 214 on that date.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013623C071029

    Original file (20060013623C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 27 (Remarks) and Item 28 (Mailing Address After Separation) of his 30 April 1978 separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. The applicant states, in effect, that Item 27 of his final DD Form 214 should contain an entry documenting his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and should include the Korean Defense Service Medal. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served in the RVN from 30 June 1967 through 28 July 1968, and that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016208

    Original file (20100016208.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 20 February 1972 to show he entered active duty on 7 June 1965 and to show the Purple Heart and the Parachutist Badge. He was issued a DD Form 214 for the period 24 August 1967 through 20 February 1972 that shows in: * item 18 (Record of Service): (a) (Net Active Service This Period) the entry "4 3 2" [indicating years, months, days] (b) (Prior Active Service) the entry "0 0...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006750

    Original file (20120006750.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending on 18 February 1972 shows: a. he had reenlisted on 20 February 1969 for 3 years; b. he had attained the rank of specialist five, E5; c. his specialty number and title at the time of REFRAD was 44C2O (Welder); d. he did not have any insurance in force. The applicant contends that his DD Forms 214 do not complement each other and they fail to show his correct: * dates of service * MOSs * period of service in the FRG * promotion status *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024292

    Original file (20110024292.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He completed 10 years, 3 months, and 1 day of creditable active service during the period of service from 30 March 1977-30 June 1987 and the DD Form 214 is available for review. With regard to adding his Vietnam service to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 20 June 1987: The available evidence shows he served in Vietnam from 17 March 1967 to 16 March 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by issuing the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011067

    Original file (20090011067.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 12 January 1973 to show his service in the Republic of Vietnam. Item 11d (Effective Date) shows the entry "26 Aug 69"; c. Item 22 (Statement of Service) shows the following entries: (1) Item 22a(1) (Net Service This Period) shows "3 1 0"; (2) Item 22a(2) (Other Service) shows "0 6 15"; (3) Item 22a(3) (Total) shows "3 7 15"; (4) Item 22b...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | AR20070005522C071029

    Original file (AR20070005522C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) to show the appropriate dates of his service in Vietnam and that he was awarded the Purple Heart. This medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020959

    Original file (20090020959.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) ending 20 July 1971 be changed to show MOS 11C1O (Infantry Indirect Fire Crewman) instead of MOS 76P2O (Stock Control and Accounting Specialist). The applicant contends his 20 July 1971 DD Form 214 should be corrected to show MOS 11C1O in item 23a. The available evidence shows the applicant completed AIT and was awarded MOS 11C1O in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022466

    Original file (20100022466.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 1 December 1967 to 22 November 1968. He was issued a DD Form 214 for this period of service which shows in item 24 that he did not earn any awards during this period of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for his...