Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014463
Original file (20080014463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  	  23 December 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080014463 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, cancellation of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he has tried for over 4 months to stop the SBP premiums from being deducted from his military retired pay because his military retired pay has been adjusted based on his receipt of disability pay from the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA).  He adds that there is no error in his military records, he just wants to cancel his SBP.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 


has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military personnel records show he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 22 December 1972.  Upon completion of basic combat and advanced individual training, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 13E (Field Artillery Cannon Operations Fire Direct Assistant).
He attained the rank of Sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5, effective and with a date of rank of 17 November 1976.  The applicant was honorably separated from active duty on 24 April 1979 based on permanent physical disability and placed on the retired list effective 25 April 1979.

3.  The applicant’s military personnel records contain a DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel), dated 26 March 1979.  This document shows the applicant elected “Spouse and Dependent Children” coverage, based on the full amount of his military retired pay.  Part X (Information on Survivor’s Benefit Plan (SBP)) contains, in pertinent part, the statement, "IMPORTANT:  YOUR ELECTION IS PERMANENTLY IRREVOCABLE.”  This document also shows that the applicant and a witness signed the form on 26 March 1979.

4.  In the processing of this case, an official with the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) provided information pertaining to the applicant's military retired pay and SBP election.  The DFAS official confirmed that the applicant’s monthly military retired pay is $576.00, less his VA disability pay of $568.00, leaving a remainder of $8.00 military retired pay.  The DFAS official also confirmed that the applicant’s monthly SBP premium is $14.79 and his monthly military retired pay of $8.00 is applied to the SBP premium, leaving a balance due of $6.79.  The DFAS official added that, as of 26 November 2008, the applicant had an SBP balance due of $62.28.  The DFAS official also indicated that the applicant could authorize the VA to pay the balance of his monthly SBP premium for him from his VA disability pay.

5.  Public Law 92-425, the Survivor Benefit Plan, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  

6.  Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation.  Retirees have a one-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to withdraw from SBP.  Members retired for more than two years as of 17 May 1998 were 


authorized a one-year opportunity (17 May 1998 through 16 May 1999) to disenroll.  The spouse’s concurrence is required.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends, in effect, that the SBP election he made on 26 March 1979 should be rescinded and his enrollment in the SBP cancelled because he no longer has sufficient military retired pay to pay the full cost of his monthly SBP premium.

2.  The evidence of record confirms that on 26 March 1979, in his application for retired pay, the applicant made his SBP election of spouse and children coverage based on the full amount of his military retired pay.  The evidence of record also shows that the applicant's monthly SBP premium is being deducted from his military retired pay.

3.  There is no evidence that shows the applicant terminated his SBP during the 17 May 1998 through 16 May 1998 period provided by law for termination.
 
4.  The evidence of record indicates that the applicant recently elected to receive tax-free disability pay from the Department of VA in lieu of a corresponding portion of his military retired pay.  Thus, the applicant’s monthly military retired pay was reduced to $8.00, while his monthly SBP premium remained at $14.79, leaving a monthly SBP premium balance due of $6.79.

5.  The evidence of record confirms that the applicant’s SBP election is correctly recorded in his military service records and the correct SBP premium is being deducted from his military retired pay by the DFAS.  Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to correction of his records to show that he rescinded his election to participate in the SBP.

6.  The applicant is advised that he may contact the VA if he is interested in authorizing the VA to pay the balance of his monthly SBP premium for him from his VA disability pay.

7.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  _____X___  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014463



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014463



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008614

    Original file (20140008614.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His request to cancel this debt is ineligible for a waiver. Following the applicant's retirement, he elected spouse SBP coverage. He did not pay SBP premiums and despite his non-payment, his spouse had the benefit of SBP coverage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004104

    Original file (20130004104.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This law also provides that every member having a spouse and/or child(ren), who retired/transfers to the retired list on or after that date, is automatically covered under SBP at the maximum rate unless he/she elected otherwise before retirement or transfer to the retired list. He elected SBP coverage for spouse and children based on the full amount. As a result, DFAS cannot automatically deduct SBP premiums from the member's monthly pay.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067415C070402

    Original file (2002067415C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    His notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) is dated 7 November 1977. Premiums are normally deducted from retired pay. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant completed his DD Form 2656 on 30 September 1996 and declined, with his spouse’s concurrence, to participate in the SBP, making the debt for SBP premiums invalid.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007817

    Original file (20140007817.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was advised that the SBP premiums would be deducted from his Military Disability Retired Pay every month. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the record to show his participation in the SBP was terminated effective 23 September 2013. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to by: a. showing his DD Form 2656-2 was received and processed on 23 September 2013; b. terminating his participation in the SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011231

    Original file (20090011231.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Part XI (Certification) of the DD Form 2656 states, in pertinent part, "Also, I have been counseled that I can terminate SBP participation, with my spouse's written concurrence, within one year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay. The evidence of record also shows the applicant retired effective 1 June 2009 and monthly SBP premiums are being deducted from his military retired pay. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant provides insufficient evidence, that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004968

    Original file (20130004968.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    was deceased as of 3 June 2006 * it appears he failed to notify DFAS (however, DFAS indicated they had been notified) * he has since remarried and would like to continue his benefit plan for his current spouse * DFAS continued to collect payments all this time (however, DFAS indicated they had not been collecting spouse premiums but had been erroneously collecting child premiums) d. a DD Form 2656, undated by the applicant, which shows; * he indicated his current coverage was spouse and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011948

    Original file (20140011948.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, through a member of congress, in effect, correction of his record to show: * he elected not to resume Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for his current spouse in conjunction with remarriage * recoupment of premiums paid 2. Only upon receipt of the marriage certificate some 24 years after the applicant's second marriage did the DFAS resume SBP coverage resulting in a debt of $63,932.30 for unpaid premiums beginning the first month following his first anniversary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083512C070212

    Original file (2003083512C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the effective date of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage be changed from 1 December 1999 to 1 July 2002. The applicant's notification of eligibility for retired pay is dated 22 January 1970. The applicant was a senior warrant officer who served in a Reserve Component in active status during the time the SBP and the RCSBP were established.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01072

    Original file (BC-2003-01072.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Microfiche entries reflect in March 1989, the applicant’s request to change voluntary former spouse coverage to spouse coverage was processed, naming his second spouse as the eligible spouse beneficiary. Evidence provided indicates the applicant chose to elect spouse SBP coverage in March 1989, changing it from former spouse coverage. The applicant has not provided any evidence that he submitted a termination request under Public Law 105-85, allowing members a one-year opportunity to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005326

    Original file (20070005326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, as the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that the FSM's records be corrected to show that he completed an RCSBP (Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan) election certificate and that she be granted a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. Public Law 95-397, the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement, but were not yet age 60, to provide an...