Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083512C070212
Original file (2003083512C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 27 March 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003083512

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Joann H. Langston Chairperson
Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor Member
Ms. Eloise C. Prendergast Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the effective date of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage be changed from 1 December 1999 to 1 July 2002.

APPLICANT STATES: That he remarried on 4 November 1998 and submitted an SBP election on 18 November 1998. He knew it would be one year until it became effective so he forgot about it. On 8 April 2002, he had major heart surgery. When he recovered, he inquired about his SBP and the retired military pay section told him they did not have an SBP option on file and, had he died, his wife would not have received anything. He resubmitted a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) on 5 July 2002. He assumed it would be effective 1 July 2002. In August 2002, his pay statement showed that $396.65 would be deducted from his pay and showed a debt balance of $2,634.16. It is unfair that he has to pay for coverage he did not receive. He won't live to pay this off. Had he been informed of the debt, he would have cancelled his SBP election.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He was born on 29 May 1926. After having had prior enlisted service, he was appointed a warrant officer (Unit Personnel Technician) in the Army National Guard on 22 December 1953. He was promoted to Chief Warrant Officer Four on 22 December 1968. He performed duties primarily as a personnel technician throughout his service as a warrant officer and exclusively from 1968 until his retirement.

The applicant's notification of eligibility for retired pay is dated 22 January 1970.

On 9 July 1979, the applicant completed a DD Form 1883 (obtained from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS)). In section II (Marital, Dependency, and Election Status), he elected to participate in the Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) for spouse only coverage, full base amount, option C. The DD Form 1883 states in this section, "IMPORTANT: The decision you make with respect to participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan is a permanent irrevocable decision. Please consider your decision and its effect very carefully."

The applicant was released from the Army National Guard on 29 May 1986 and transferred to the Retired Reserve.

Records at DFAS indicate the applicant informed them on 5 February 1998 that his spouse died. He apparently remarried on 4 November 1998. There is no record at DFAS of a new DD Form 1883 prepared on or about 18 November 1998. DFAS's next entry shows that he informed them in July 2002 that he remarried .

Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. Elections are made by category, not by name. An election, once made, is irrevocable.

Public Law 94-496, enacted 14 October 1976 but effective 1 October 1976, provided that spouse costs would be suspended if marriage ends in death or divorce. It also reduced the waiting period for new spouse eligibility from 2 years to 1 year following post-retirement marriage.

Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. If death does not occur before age 60, the RCSBP costs for options B and C are deducted from the member's retired pay.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The applicant was a senior warrant officer who served in a Reserve Component in active status during the time the SBP and the RCSBP were established. Moreover, the DD Form 1883 he completed in July 1979 clearly indicated that elections were made by category and that, once made, were irrevocable. There was no requirement for him to complete a new DD Form 1883 upon his remarriage and it appears DFAS did not receive this new DD Form 1883.

3. The applicant should have noticed at least on his 2000 and 2001 retiree pay account statements that SBP premiums were not being deducted. He had a responsibility to himself and his new spouse not to wait until after he had life-threatening surgery to inquire about it.


4. Notwithstanding what an unknown person at DFAS may have told the applicant about his spouse not receiving the annuity if he had died, she would have been eligible to receive the annuity. DFAS had the July 1979 DD Form 1883 even if the applicant did not keep his personal copy of it. His spouse had the protection of the SBP after the first anniversary of their marriage; that protection must be paid for.

5. It is regrettable that the applicant did not check the status of his SBP premiums sooner. However, even if he had been informed of the amount of the debt in July 2002 he could not have cancelled the SBP. He had made an irrevocable election.

6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__jhl___ __rvo___ __ecp___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003083512
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20030327
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY Mr. Chun
ISSUES 1. 137.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020679

    Original file (20120020679.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his military records be corrected by canceling his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) participation for spouse coverage. The applicant states: * SBP and Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) deductions should not be withheld from his military retirement * it was his understanding when he divorced Betty and he got confirmation that spousal SBP had stopped that was all he had to do * when he remarried in 2001, he assumed that if they wanted SBP that he had to request it * his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005326

    Original file (20070005326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, as the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that the FSM's records be corrected to show that he completed an RCSBP (Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan) election certificate and that she be granted a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. Public Law 95-397, the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement, but were not yet age 60, to provide an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010144

    Original file (20090010144.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090010144 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant’s DD Form 2656-11 shows that on 8 January 2009 he verified that he had been notified by DFAS of the requirement to have 360 plus months toward Paid-Up SBP. Effective 1 October 2008, no reduction may be made in the retired pay of a participant in the SBP for any month after the later of : (1) the 360th month for which the participant’s retired pay is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009043

    Original file (20140009043.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He completed prior service in the Regular Army and married L____ on 27 March 1987. The applicant provided a Complaint for Absolute Divorce that was filed on 15 July 2003; however, his service record is void of evidence and he has not provided any evidence which shows he was granted a final divorce by the court.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086320C070212

    Original file (2003086320C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was a noncommissioned officer with 20 years of qualifying service for retirement when he completed the DD Form 1883. The evidence of record suggests the applicant was not unfit for duty. DFAS records indicate the applicant disenrolled from the SBP during the second anniversary of his retirement date as provided for by law.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019028

    Original file (20080019028.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 January 2008, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656-5 (RCSBP Election Certificate) in which he elected spouse-only coverage, option C, full retired pay. However, although he divorced and later remarried on 7 May 1993, he still would not have been eligible to change his SBP election to include spouse coverage within 1 year as he contends he was informed because he had already been afforded an opportunity to elect spouse coverage and he and his then spouse elected not to do so. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010875

    Original file (20060010875.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DFAS retired pay statement shows he became eligible for retired pay on 1 June 2006. Option B or C participants do not make a new SBP election at age 60. The evidence of record shows the applicant elected option C on 22 November 1989.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017757

    Original file (20090017757.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant submits a DD Form 1883 completed by the FSM dated 13 January 1992: * showing his status as married * listing the applicant's name as his spouse * indicating he had two dependent children * electing SBP coverage for spouse and children * electing Option C based on full amount of retired pay 11. The applicant also submits a DD Form 2656 completed by the FSM on 24 April 2006: * showing his status as married * listing the applicant's name as his spouse * electing SBP coverage for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007149

    Original file (20090007149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He argues that he clearly elected not to participate in the SBP on the DD Form 2656 and his spouse concurred. If the applicant elects to terminate his SBP participation at that time, he is advised that despite his action, the Reserve Component premium add-on will be deducted from his retired pay for life. He is further advised that in his particular case, he can withdraw from the SBP during a 1-year window beginning in December 2010, the second anniversary of his receipt of retired pay,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015648C070206

    Original file (20050015648C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSM married the applicant on 10 March 1988. Once a member elects either options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. voiding the 7 February 1985 DD Form 1883; b. showing the FSM enrolled in the RCSBP on 11 February 1984 for spouse and children coverage by completing a DD Form 1883 and the DD Form 1883 was accepted and processed by the...