Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013547
Original file (20080013547.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 April 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080013547 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he was awarded the Joint Meritorious Unit Award.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his unit was awarded the Joint Meritorious Unit Award for exceptionally meritorious achievement during his period of assignment.  The applicant continues that due to the fact that he retired prior to the final approval of this unit award, the Joint Meritorious Unit Award is not annotated in his records.

3.  The applicant provides copies of orders to active duty, a Joint Staff memorandum, a Joint Staff permanent order, and a Joint Staff award citation as documentary evidence in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's record shows that he was a member of the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement).  During his most recent period of active duty, he held the rank of sergeant major/pay grade E-9 and military occupational specialty 38A (Civil Affairs Specialist).  The applicant was retired and placed on the Retired List effective 1 February 2007.

2.  United States Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Missouri, Orders A-03-506245, dated 2 March 2005, show he was ordered to active duty in support of Operations Noble Eagle, Enduring Freedom, and Iraqi Freedom effective 7 March 2005.  These orders also show the applicant was attached to the 93d United States Army Element (USAE) of U.S. Pacific Command (USPACOM), located at Camp Smith, Hawaii, with duty at USPACOM.

3.  The applicant's DA Forms 2166-8 (NCO [Noncommissioned Officer] Evaluation Report) rendered for the period March 2005 through January 2007 show that he served with USAE USPACOM, located at Camp Smith, Hawaii.

4.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) rendered for the period 1 October 2006 through 30 January 2007 does not show award of the Joint Meritorious Unit Award.

5.  There are no indications in the applicant's service personnel records which show that he was assigned to a unit that was awarded the Joint Meritorious Unit Award.

6.  The applicant provides a copy of a Joint Staff memorandum, dated 7 March 2007, subject:  Joint Meritorious Unit Award, which informed the Commander of the United States Army Human Resources Command that the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff had awarded the Joint Meritorious Unit Award to Headquarters, USPACOM, and other specific units for exceptionally meritorious achievement from 1 March 2005 to 28 February 2007.  This memorandum specified that only those members of the Armed Forces who were present at the time and directly participated in the service or achievement for 30 days or more were authorized to wear the Joint Meritorious Unit Award ribbon.  The memorandum further specified that in order to be eligible, personnel must have been assigned and/or attached by official orders to the joint unit or task force headquarters receiving the Joint Meritorious Unit Award.  The memorandum concluded by requesting that the Commander of the United States Army Human Resources Command announce the approved unit award within the Army and include it in the Army's unit award records and publications.  A copy of the Joint Staff permanent order and award citation documenting this unit award were provided along with the memorandum.

7.  Department of Defense 1348.33-M (Manual of Military Decorations and Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Joint Meritorious Unit Award is awarded in the name of the Secretary of Defense and is intended to recognize joint units and activities for meritorious achievement or service superior to that which is normally expected.  All joint units and activities are eligible for award of the Joint Meritorious Unit Award in recognition of exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding service.  However, a unit’s or activity’s outstanding accomplishment of its normally assigned and expected mission is not in and of itself sufficient justification for award approval.  Instead, qualifying achievements must be superior to that which is expected under one of the following conditions and should be operational in nature:  (1) during action in combat with an armed enemy of the United States, (2) in a declared national emergency situation, or (3) under extraordinary circumstances that involve national interests.  The Joint Meritorious Unit Award shall not be awarded to any Department of Defense activity that has received any other unit award for the same achievement or period of service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the Joint Meritorious Unit Award was carefully considered and determined to have merit.

2.  Joint Staff permanent orders show the applicant’s unit was awarded the Joint Meritorious Unit Award for exceptionally meritorious achievement during the applicant’s tenure of assignment.  Therefore, he is entitled to have his records corrected to show this unit award.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Depart-ment of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show award of the Joint Meritorious Unit Award.



      ___________x______________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013547



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013547



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005512

    Original file (20130005512.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the Meritorious Unit Commendation (Army) and the Joint Meritorious Unit Award be added to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). His Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) shows he was assigned to the 28th Combat Support Hospital from 9 March 2003 to 14 February 2004. There is no evidence available showing the applicant was assigned to CJTF-7 during the period the unit was awarded JMUA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012646

    Original file (20100012646.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Headquarters, 160th SOAR, Permanent Order Number 221-6, dated 8 August 2008, shows the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (First Oak Leaf Cluster) for meritorious service during the period 25 February 2005 to 18 July 2008. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Iraq Campaign Medal is awarded to members who have served in direct support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (First Oak...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01092

    Original file (BC-2002-01092.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01092 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Brief (OSB) be corrected to include the award of the Air Force Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), the Aerial Achievement Medal (AAM), the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM), his overseas duty history and assignment to Kadena Air Base,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001768C070206

    Original file (20050001768C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Michael J. Flynn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Joint Meritorious Unit Award (JMUA) and the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). The applicant provided a memorandum from the Military Intelligence Battalion dated 15 March 2004, (4 years after his separation from active duty)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001768C070206

    Original file (20050001768C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Joint Meritorious Unit Award (JMUA) and the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). The applicant’s DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) does not show in item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) the JMUA as an authorized award. The applicant provided a memorandum from the Military Intelligence Battalion dated 15 March 2004, (4 years after his separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000986

    Original file (20070000986.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 13 April 2007, that shows Item 27 (Reentry Code) of the applicant’s DD Form 214, with an effective date of 16 November 2006, was corrected to show “RE 3.” As a result, the Reentry Code will not be discussed further in this Record of Proceedings. Army Achievement Medal Certificate issued under the authority of Headquarters, 44th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009689

    Original file (20120009689.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation and the Iraq Campaign Medal. Units based in the continental United States are excluded from this award, as are other units outside the area of operations. The Joint Meritorious Unit Award may not be awarded to any Department of Defense activity which has received any other unit award for the same achievement or period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016197

    Original file (20060016197.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This order shows, in pertinent part, that the applicant was promoted to the grade of rank of CPT, effective and with a DOR of 1 March 2005. The applicant adds, in effect, that the Reserve Support Command should be able to confirm another person was assigned as the MP Platoon Leader and that he was assigned as the Operations Officer (i.e., a captain's position) from 16 July 2001 through 9 February 2003. Chief, Office of Promotions, RC, USA HRC, St. Louis, Missouri, effect necessary action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009287

    Original file (20060009287.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant also requests award of the Combat Medical Badge and any other awards authorized for his unit during his military service in Haiti. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was awarded the Combat Medical Badge during his military service. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his records to show this unit award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012233

    Original file (20120012233.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Superior Unit Award (ASUA) and the Holland Cross for the Four Day Marches. However, there is no evidence that the Holland Four Day Event Cross was awarded to the applicant in recognition of this military activity and by the military department of the host country. However, the evidence of record failed to reveal any evidence that the applicant was awarded...