Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013020
Original file (20080013020.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       12 February 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080013020 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve.  

2.  The applicant states he spent 21 years in the service and was released from active duty instead of being put in the Retired Reserve.  Consequently, he cannot get an identification card and use his benefits.  

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was born on 2 December 1958.  After having active and inactive service in the United States Navy, he enlisted in the Army National Guard on 10 April 1995.  He was promoted to sergeant, E-5 on 9 May 1997 in military occupational specialty 51B2O (carpentry and masonry specialist).  He was discharged from the Army National Guard and as a Reserve of the Army on 24 August 1997.  

2.  On 25 August 1997, the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) for a period of six years.  He was ordered to active duty in an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) status on 17 October 1999.



3.  On 28 October 2003, the applicant reenlisted in the USAR in an AGR status for a period of three years.  

4.  On 7 September 2006, the applicant submitted a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) to be discharged from the AGR program at his expiration of term of service (ETS).  This Personnel Action shows his ETS date as 27 October 2006.

5.  Department of the Army, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO, Orders D-11-690201, dated 2 November 2006, discharged the applicant from the USAR AGR program on 1 December 2006.

6.  His Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter) is dated 3 July 2008.

7.  During the processing of this case, a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO.  The opinion pointed out that the applicant's Personnel Action, dated 7 September 2006, did not indicate he wished to be released from active duty and transferred to the Retired Reserve.  The applicant requested ETS from the AGR program.  At the time of his request for separation and his ETS, he did not have a contractual reserve obligation; therefore, he was discharged from the Army.  The opinion stated that it cannot be determined if the applicant was aware that his request had to be specific; therefore, it was recommended that the Board approve the applicant's petition to be transferred to the Retired Reserve.  

8.  A copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for his information and possible comment.  On 15 January 2009, the applicant concurred with the advisory opinion rendered in his case.  

9.  His Chronological Statement of Retirement Points, dated 29 January 2009, shows he completed 21 years, 3 months, and 14 days of qualifying service for retired pay at age 60.

10.  Army Regulation 140-10 (Assignments, Attachments, Details, and Transfers) covers policy and procedures for assigning and transferring USAR Soldiers.  In pertinent part, it states that assignment to the Retired Reserve is authorized in a number of circumstances but an eligible Soldier must request transfer.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In September 2006, the applicant submitted a written request to be discharged from the USAR AGR at his ETS.  It appears that he did not request transfer to the Retired Reserve at that time.  As a result, orders were published which discharged him from the USAR AGR program on 1 December 2006, two months after his actual ETS date of 27 October 2006.  

2.  Based on the advisory opinion from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO, the applicant may not have known that his request had to be specific in nature (i.e. transfer to the Retired Reserve).

3.  The evidence of record shows the applicant completed 21 years of qualifying service for retired pay at age 60 at the time of his discharge.  

4.  The applicant will not be eligible for retired pay for another 9 years.  Any reasonable doubt concerning his intention to transfer to the Retired Reserve should be resolved in his favor as it would be in the Government's interest to transfer him to the Retired Reserve where he could be a mobilization asset for a reasonable length of time.  Therefore, it would be appropriate as a matter of equity to void the applicant’s discharge of 1 December 2006 and correct his records to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ____x____  ___x_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected:

	a.  by revoking Department of the Army, U.S. Army Human Resources Command-St. Louis, Orders D-11-690201, dated 2 November 2006; and

	b.  by publishing orders assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective 1 December 2006.



      _______ _  xxx _______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013020





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013020



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016747

    Original file (20080016747.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In an exchange of email messages between the applicant, the applicant's commander, and his HRC-St. Louis personnel manager, the personnel manager questions the recommendation to disapprove the applicant's request for reenlistment, to which the commander states that he disapproved the exception to policy to reenlist in the AGR program and, as a commander, he is not required by regulation to state his reasons. The evidence of record shows that the applicant entered the AGR program in May 1999...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008588

    Original file (20080008588.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a 7-page self-authored statement, undated; DD Form 214, with an effective date of 12 September 2004; electronic mail (email) message, dated 22 December 2004, subject: Military Technician Status; email, dated 27 December 2004, subject: Reserve Status; Medical Operational Data Systems (MODS) - Individual Medical Readiness Record, dated 10 January 2007; FEDS HEAL, The Federal Strategic Health Alliance, Memorandum for Command, dated 17 September 2004; subject: Results of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000984

    Original file (20070000984.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Records show the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve and issued a NGB Form 22 (Department of the Army and the Air Force National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service) with an effective date of 16 January 2006. VSI annual payments will be discontinued if the member is separated from the Ready Reserve unless the individual becomes ineligible to continue to serve due to medical or age limitations in which case the soldier will be transferred to the Standby...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004505

    Original file (20080004505.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that after completion of his active duty for the AGR (Active Guarded Reserve) in the rank and pay grade of SFC/E-7, his rank was supposed to be restored to MSG/E-8 for retirement. The applicant was ordered to active duty in the AGR in the rank of SFC with a reporting date of 24 September 2003, for 3 years, as a senior personnel sergeant. An email was provided by the Senior Human Resources Sergeant, 655th RSG, 316th Support Command, who informed this agency...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011680

    Original file (20130011680.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant acknowledged she had been advised of the basis for the contemplated action to separate her and requested consideration of her case by an administrative separation board. Army Regulation 135-18 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve – The AGR Program), chapter 5 (Separations), states enlisted USAR Soldiers released from active duty while serving in the AGR Program under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, are subject to separation under the provisions of Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011946

    Original file (20060011946.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that his date of rank to MAJ should be adjusted to one of the following dates: the date he entered the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), which was 4 March 2005; the date he should have been promoted while serving on active duty, which would have been in the Spring of 2003 or 2004; or the date he was promoted to MAJ in the Army National Guard (ARNG). The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002910

    Original file (20070002910.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    United States Army Human Resources Command (St. Louis) memorandum, dated 22 November 2006, informed the applicant that by the direction of the President, she was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army, effective on her acceptance. A DA Form 1506 authenticated by the Chief of the Essential Service Branch of United States Army Human Resources Command (St. Louis) shows the applicant's active duty service in the United States Army Reserve Active Guard/Reserve from 2 July 2005...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050013253C070206

    Original file (20050013253C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reinstatement in an active Reserve status, promotion to lieutenant colonel, and transfer to the Oregon Army National Guard (ORARNG) to complete his career. The applicant states, in effect, that he was retired from the ORARNG on 31 August 2002. The applicant had completed over 20 years of active Federal service and was released from active duty and transferred to the Retired Reserve on 31 August 2002 based on operation of law for sufficient service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009974

    Original file (20090009974.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected by voiding his 2 February 2005 discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) and showing that he was instead transferred to the Retired Reserve on that same date. The applicant's record shows that previously serving on active duty in the Regular Army and in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), the applicant enlisted in the ARNG on 12 August 1976. However, the evidence of record confirms he was discharged from the USAR in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008198

    Original file (20130008198.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was released from service in 1991 and early retirement was not offered; he was ultimately discharged in 2005 but he was not aware of the 15-year letter * he did not request to be removed from the Active Guard Reserve (AGR) and he has several letters from commanding officers not to remove him from the AGR * he was released from active duty in 1993 due to downsizing and he was placed in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) with 18 years of...