Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009974
Original file (20090009974.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:		  24 November 2009   

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090009974 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected by voiding his 
2 February 2005 discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) and showing that he was instead transferred to the Retired Reserve on that same date.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he should have been placed in the Retired Reserve so he could continue to receive the pay increases he is entitled to.  He claims he never received a National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) or told he would be transferred to the Retired Reserve.  

3.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application:  NGB Form 22, dated 30 April 1998; Army National Guard (ARNG) Discharge Orders, dated 31 March 1998; Revocation of ARNG Discharge Orders, dated      1 April 1998; and ARNG Discharge Orders, dated 1 April 1998.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows that previously serving on active duty in the Regular Army and in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), the applicant enlisted in the ARNG on 12 August 1976.  

3.  On 22 September 1995, the State of Indiana, Military Department, Office of The Adjutant General, published a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20 Year Letter), notifying the applicant he had completed the required years of service necessary to qualify for retired pay at age 60.  

4.  A DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) in the applicant's record shows that on 8 June 1997, the applicant extended his enlistment for an additional 6 years, which established his new expiration of term of service (ETS) as 11 August 2003.  

5.  On 30 April 1998, the applicant was honorably discharged from the ARNG, in the rank of sergeant (SGT), and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).  The NGB Form 22 he was issued at the time shows he completed a total of 25 years, 7 months, and 1 day of service for pay purposes.  

6.  United States Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Missouri
(HRC- St. Louis) electronic records show his ETS expired on 11 August 2003.  It further shows that his honorable discharge was directed in Orders D02503715, dated 2 February 2005, and that this was an involuntary action resulting from the expiration of his ETS.  The orders are not available.  There is no indication that the applicant had any contact or performed any service while in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) between 30 April 1998, the date of his discharge from the ARNG and 2 February 2005, the date of his discharge from the USAR, or that he ever attempted to extend his service obligation beyond his 11 August 2003 ETS. 

7.  HRC-St. Louis Orders P06-907560, dated 23 June 2009, directed the applicant's retirement and placement on the Retired List, in the grade of SGT, effective 9 November 2008.  

8.  Army Regulation 140-10 (Assignments, Attachments, Details, and Transfers) prescribes policies, responsibilities, and procedures to assign, attach, detail, 

remove, or transfer USAR Soldiers.  Chapter 7 contains guidance on removal from active status and paragraph 7-1a indicates that Soldiers removed from active status will be discharged or transferred to the Retired Reserve upon their request if they are eligible.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his record should be corrected to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve instead of being discharged on 2 February 2005, was carefully considered.  However, the evidence of record confirms he was discharged from the USAR in accordance with applicable regulations based on his failure to extend his ETS or request transfer to the Retired Reserve upon his ETS.  There is no evidence to suggest he ever requested or was denied the option of transferring to the Retired Reserve prior to his ETS. 

2.  Further, the applicant is advised that the continuation of pay increases for members serving in the Retired Reserve are not automatic and are based on the continued availability of those members for recall to an active status in emergency situations.  Therefore, given there is no evidence he was unjustly denied the opportunity to request transfer to the Retired Reserve and because has not been available for recall since his discharge, it would not be appropriate to correct his record solely for the purpose of entitling him to benefits he did not earn.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  __X_____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 

are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009974



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009974



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010430

    Original file (20090010430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 December 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090010430 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected by voiding his discharge, dated 19 January 2008, and showing he was transferred to the Retired Reserve on that same date. However, the evidence of record confirms he was discharged from the ARNG and as a Reserve of the Army on 19 January 2008, which was also the date of his ETS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010927

    Original file (20110010927.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no record of a reenlistment or extension subsequent to 17 June 2000 and no record that separation/discharge orders were published to effect his discharge on 17 June 2000. These orders stated that he would remain subject to the Reserve Component unit stop loss policy for 90 days after his release from active duty date. The evidence of record supports the applicant's claim that he was subject to Stop Loss and held on active duty past his ETS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000984

    Original file (20070000984.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Records show the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve and issued a NGB Form 22 (Department of the Army and the Air Force National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service) with an effective date of 16 January 2006. VSI annual payments will be discontinued if the member is separated from the Ready Reserve unless the individual becomes ineligible to continue to serve due to medical or age limitations in which case the soldier will be transferred to the Standby...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014995C070206

    Original file (20050014995C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, transfer to the Retired Reserve prior to his expiration of term of service (ETS) on 30 January 2005, or extension of his enlistment contract until his 60th birthday (11 February 2005). It would now be equitable and just to correct his military records by voiding his 2 February 2005 discharge from the USAR and assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective 29 January 2005. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016104C070206

    Original file (20050016104C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Retirement Credits Report from the Maryland ARNG on file shows that between 1975 and 1987, the applicant completed 12 years of qualifying service for non-regular retirement. On 21 December 1988, the applicant was informed that he had been twice non-selected for promotion, and that he had the options of requesting retention to complete 20 years of qualifying service, requesting discharge from the USAR, or requesting transfer to the Retired Reserve. It further indicates that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016733

    Original file (20090016733.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chapter 11 specifies that upon expiration of the Soldier's term of enlistment, reenlistment, or period of statutorily obligated service, the Soldier will be discharged by the separation authority. Army Regulation 135-180 (ARNG and Army Reserve Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), paragraph 2-1a, indicates that to be eligible for retired pay an individual does not need to have a military status at the time of application for retired pay, but must have: (1) attained age 60,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017679

    Original file (20120017679.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It was his understanding at the time that if he had enough years of service upon reaching ETS, he would automatically be placed in the Retired Reserve. The available evidence does not support correction of the applicant's record to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve instead of being discharged. The evidence of record does not show that he did so.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012521C080407

    Original file (20070012521C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his 31 August 2001 discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that his records be corrected to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve on that same date. This official further states that the applicant was in possession of a 20-Year Letter at the time of his discharge and since there is no proof the applicant actually received an option letter and since it is no longer a requirement for a Soldier to elect transfer to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011413

    Original file (20080011413.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) contained in the applicant's records show that, on 31 July 1992, the applicant enlisted in the USAR for a period of three (3) years. On 25 April 2005, the applicant called HRC-St. Louis regarding his upcoming reenlistment date and he was informed that he needed to schedule a physical examination appointment because his physical had expired. g. The applicant called HRC-St. Louis on 1 August 2006 regarding his VSI again and was informed that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029921

    Original file (20100029921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In effect, he requests to be advanced on the retired list to the highest grade held. Therefore, the applicant’s records should be corrected to show he was placed on the retired list in the rank/grade of SSG/E-6, effective 25 November 2010, the date he turned 60 and became eligible to receive retired pay. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending Orders P10-929149, dated 29 October 2010, to show he was...