Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012935
Original file (20080012935.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  23 September 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080012935 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 3 (Grade, Rate, Rank, and Date of Appointment) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show he was discharged as a corporal (CPL) not as a private (PVT).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was court-martialed on December 1954 and sentenced to serve 5 months in confinement.  However, his colonel disapproved the sentence and, therefore, he was never reduced to a PVT.  He states that he would like to have his DD Form 214 corrected because he is doing business with the Department of Veterans Affairs.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's military records are not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 13 January 1953.  He completed the necessary training and was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

4.  He served continuously on active duty until he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve on 4 March 1955.  He completed 1 year, 11 months, and 29 days of Net Service For Pay Purposes and he accrued 52 days of lost time.

5.  Item 3 of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "PVT-1 (P) 20 Dec 54."

6.  The available evidence does not contain any promotion or reduction orders that show the applicant was advanced to CPL nor does it contain a copy of a court-martial proceeding.

7.  Special Regulation 615-360-1 (Enlisted Personnel), then in effect, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  This regulation states, in pertinent part, that you enter the grade in which serving at the time of separation, indicating whether permanent or temporary and the date of appointment.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214, item 3 should be corrected to show the rank of CPL, instead of PVT.

2.  The available evidence does not show the applicant was promoted beyond the rank and pay grade of PVT/E-1.  However, the applicant’s date of rank to PVT is 20 December 1954, which is well after his induction date; it would appear he was reduced to PVT on this date.  While there is no evidence of a court-martial conviction, he accrued 52 days of lost time.  Therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was separated in the rank of CPL, and he has established no basis for such a correction.

3.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, records should not be changed.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080012935



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080012935



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009716

    Original file (20080009716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his rank on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show he was a “SPEC 5.” 2. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. His...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009876

    Original file (20140009876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade and date of rank of the grade held at the time of separation. _____________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003771

    Original file (20080003771.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to change the applicant's rank from PFC to CPL in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013670

    Original file (20080013670.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations), in effect at the time, established uniform administrative procedures and separation forms to be used in connection with the relief from active duty or complete separation of enlisted and warrant/commissioned officer personnel. If the grade at the time of separation was not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank if different from the date of appointment is entered in item 38. The evidence of record shows that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010407

    Original file (20100010407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states his DD Form 214 and Honorable Discharge Certificate show he was discharged as a PVT, but other records show he was a CPL. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006623

    Original file (20110006623.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. These orders show his grade as CPL. Since there is no evidence that shows he was reduced in rank at any time after 21 January 1954, the orders provided by the applicant which show his rank as CPL are accepted as sufficient evidence in which to correct item 3 of his DD Form 214 to show his rank as CPL.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006584

    Original file (20090006584.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant's reconstructed record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 29 October 1948 and was discharged on 30 May 1951 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment. With respect to the applicant's rank/grade, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was promoted to the permanent rank/grade of PV2/E-2 on 20 August 1953.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005575

    Original file (20140005575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade and date of rank of the grade held at the time of separation. The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty from 4 October 1954 to 24 September 1957.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018335

    Original file (20140018335.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the record of her deceased uncle, a former service member (FSM), to show the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), American Defense Service Medal (ADSM) and the Overseas Service Bar (OSB). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the ADSM is awarded for service within the American theater between 8 September 1939 and 7 December 1941 under orders to active duty for a period of 12 months or longer. An Overseas Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017114

    Original file (20130017114.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his Honorable Discharge Certificate and DD Form 214. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains correcting...