Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071688C070403
Original file (2002071688C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 18 July 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002071688


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor Chairperson
Mr. Stanley Kelley Member
Mr. John P. Infante Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

3. The applicant states that he was in combat and earned the CIB. He provides his Report of Transfer or Discharge, DD Form 214, as supporting evidence. Counsel contends that the record indicates the applicant served as a personnel carrier driver with the 5th Mechanized Infantry while in Vietnam, this being in line with the duties of an infantryman.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 November 1966. He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 36K (Wireman).

5. The applicant arrived in Vietnam and was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Battalion, 5th Infantry on 31 October 1967 as a wireman, personnel carrier driver, and switchboard operator at various times. He departed on 19 October 1968 and received credit for four campaigns.

6. The applicant was released from active duty on 10 December 1969. His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Purple Heart, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Sharpshooter Qualification Badge (rifle M-14) and the Expert Qualification Badge (rifle M-16).

7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. In pertinent part, it states that the CIB was established during World War II to provide special recognition of the unique role of the Army infantryman, the only soldier whose daily mission is to close with and destroy the enemy and to seize and hold terrain. The badge was intended as an inducement for individuals to join the infantry while serving as a morale booster for infantrymen. In developing the CIB, the War Department did not dismiss or ignore the contributions of other branches. Their vital contributions to the overall war effort were noted, but it was decided that other awards and decorations were sufficient to recognize their contributions. From the beginning, Army leadership have taken care to retain the badge for the unique purpose for which it was established. There are basically three requirements for award of the CIB. The soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and must actively participate in such ground combat.


8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states that one bronze service star is worn on the appropriate service medal for each credited campaign.

9. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 shows that the 1st Battalion, 5th Infantry was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation for the period 18 August through 20 September 1968, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period January 1966 through August 1968, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class Unit Citation for the period 1 January 1966 through 21 January 1970.

CONCLUSIONS
:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The Board deeply appreciates the applicant’s service with an infantry unit and notes that, with his performance of duties as a personnel carrier driver for a period of time and his award of the Purple Heart, he most certainly was engaged in combat. However, these factors do not qualify him for award of the CIB. The most basic of the three requirements for award of the CIB is that the soldier be an infantryman. The applicant was not an infantryman.

3. The applicant is authorized to wear four bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal. In addition, he was assigned to a unit during a period of time that unit was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class Unit Citation. He is authorized to wear these unit awards, also.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That the applicant’s DD Form 214 be amended to show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, the Presidential Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class Unit Citation.


2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

__RVO__ __ SK _ _ _JPI __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                                                      ___Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr._
                                                               CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID AR2002071688
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2002/07/18
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION PARTIAL GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.0111
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012979C080213

    Original file (20070012979C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 for the period ending 22 April 1969 shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), the “VN Unit Citation,” two overseas bars, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar M-14. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000334

    Original file (20080000334.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant’s military service records showing he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. This document also shows that at the time of his assignment to the unit, the unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation by Headquarters, Department of the Army, General Orders Number 48 (1971). The applicant contends, in effect, that his discharge document should be corrected to show he held MOS 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman), MOS 91B...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009693

    Original file (20110009693.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 38 (Record of Assignments): * he served in duty MOS 11D and his principal duty was light truck driver while assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Troop (HHT), 1st Squadron, 4th Cavalry in Vietnam from 25 July 1966 through 2 February 1967 * he served in duty MOS 11D and his principal duty was personnel carrier driver while assigned to HHT, 1st Squadron, 4th Cavalry in Vietnam from 3 February 1967 through 28 June 1967 * he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100341C070208

    Original file (2004100341C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was awarded the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 19 September 1966 to 2 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065168C070421

    Original file (2001065168C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show all awards, decorations and badges to which he is entitled. The applicant’s service personnel records contain 25th Infantry Division General Orders Number 5769, dated 8 August 1968, which awarded him the Silver Star for gallantry in action on 1 February 1968. Orders show the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge while a member of the 173rd Airborne...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015631

    Original file (20090015631.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), two awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and in effect, the Vietnam Parachutist Badge. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) lists one award of the ARCOM and the Vietnam Parachutist Badge. The Military Awards regulation governing award of the CIB states...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001068

    Original file (20100001068.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records show he is entitled to additional awards and decorations which he did not request and are not shown on his DD Form 214. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 the Vietnam Service Medal; and b. adding the Combat Infantryman Badge, Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, Presidential Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000410C070206

    Original file (20050000410C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). There is no evidence that the applicant was awarded an infantry MOS or served in ground combat as an infantryman. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068189C070402

    Original file (2002068189C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel record, which show that he was awarded the CIB. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant participated in eight campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the applicant’s DD Form 214 to show the award of the Expert Badge with Rifle Bar, four Overseas Service Bars, the Vietnam Service Medal with one silver service star and three...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011714

    Original file (20100011714.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records do not contain any orders awarding him the CIB. This document shows that the 1st Battalion, 8th Calvary Regiment, to which the applicant was assigned, was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 59, dated 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24...