Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012370
Original file (20080012370.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  2 October 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080012370


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his rank be changed from a S/Sgt to a T/Sgt.

2.  The applicant states that platoon sergeants were promoted to T/Sgt.  However, he was not available to receive his promotion because he was wounded and hospitalized in Italy at that time.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his WD AGO Form 53-55, his Soldier’s Discharge Record, and excerpts from the history of the Third Infantry Division in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant’s records 
were lost or destroyed in that fire.  This case is being considered using reconstructed records that primarily consist of the applicant’s separation document.

3.  The applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55 shows that he was inducted into the Army and entered active duty on 13 February 1941.  It further shows that he served in the European-African-Middle Eastern Theater of Operations from 8 November 1942 through 30 March 1945.  

4.  The applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55 further shows that he was honorably separated from active duty on 3 June 1945.  Item 3 (Grade) shows he held the rank of S/Sgt (Staff Sergeant) on the date of his separation and Item 38 (Highest Grade Held) confirms that Staff Sergeant was the highest rank he held while serving on active duty.  

5.  Item 30, Military Occupational Specialty and No., has Platoon Sergeant entered.

6.  Item 34, Wounds Received In Action, has Wounded in Action in Italy 18 Sept 43 entered.

7.  The grade structure during the applicant’s tenure on active duty was as follows:  

   Grade 1 	Master Sergeant and First Sergeant
		Grade 2 	Technical Sergeant 
		Grade 3  	Staff Sergeant and Technician 3rd Class
		Grade 4 	Sergeant and Technician 4th Class
		Grade 5	Corporal & Technician 5th Class
		Grade 6 	Private First Class
		Grade 7	Private

8.  The few reconstructed records all show the applicant’s last grade, rank, or rating was Staff Sergeant.  






DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his record should be corrected to show the rank of Technical Sergeant was carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim.  

2.  The applicant’s properly constituted separation document confirms he held the rank of Staff Sergeant on the date of his separation, and that this was the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty.  

3.  There is no available evidence to show the applicant was recommended for promotion to Technical Sergeant, or that he was ever selected for or promoted to this rank by a proper promotion authority.  

4.  The applicant’s contention that he was wounded in Italy is supported by the entry in Item 34 of his separation document.  However, the applicant was wounded on 18 September 1943 and did not leave the EAME Theater of Operations until 30 March 1945.  While the duration of the applicant’s hospitalization is not a matter of record, the applicant remained in the theater almost a year and a half after he was wounded before departing.

5.  While Item 30, Military Occupational Specialty and No., of the applicant’s separation document shows he was serving as a Platoon Sergeant, it was not unusual during World War II for Soldiers to serve in higher ranking positions due to casualties during a battle or battles.  However, a Soldier required promotion orders in order to hold the higher grade in which he was performing duties.

6.  In view of the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence in which to grant the applicant’s request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X______  ___X___  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION




BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080012370



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007578

    Original file (20100007578.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army medical records from 1941 show the date he was wounded in action as 14 October 1943 and not 18 September 1943 as shown on his WD AGO Form 53-55. There are no general orders in the available records that show award of the Silver Star. The applicant contends that her father's WD AGO Form 53-55 should be corrected to show the Silver Star, his rank as a S/Sgt, and the date wounded as 14 October 1943.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017339

    Original file (20130017339.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Service) to show the rank of corporal (CPL) instead of the rank of private first class (PFC). The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he held the rank of PFC at the time of separation and the highest rank he held while on active duty was CPL.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018390

    Original file (20120018390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of her original request that the WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Records and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show his grade as that of a sergeant (Sgt) or staff sergeant (S/Sgt) instead of Technician Third Class (T/3). His WD AGO Form 100 (Separation Qualification Record) shows he held the grade of private first class for 7 months and the grade of T/3 for 10 months. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011335

    Original file (20120011335.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the son of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable) to show his grade as Technical Sergeant (T/Sgt) instead of "PFC" (Private First Class). All enlisted and noncommissioned ranks were reduced from 128 different insignias and several pay grades to only seven rank insignias and seven pay grades, which were numbered in seniority from 1st Grade (highest) to 7th Grade (lowest). ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120004185

    Original file (20120004185.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) to show his rank as a Technician Fourth Grade (T-4) instead of corporal (Cpl). The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. The Enlisted Grade Structure in the Army has changed several times since 1942.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021730

    Original file (20120021730.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) to show: * his rank as sergeant (SGT) vice private first class (PFC) * award of the Bronze Star Medal 2. The applicant's complete military records are not available for review. Unfortunately, there are no orders in his reconstructed record that show he was promoted or appointed to SGT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020023

    Original file (20110020023.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests the FSM's grade be changed from "T/3" [Technician Third Grade] to "Sergeant." There is no evidence in the available records which shows the FSM held the rank of "Sergeant" prior to his discharge on 29 August 1946. All enlisted and noncommissioned ranks were reduced from 128 different insignias and several pay grades to only 7 rank insignias and 7 pay grades, which were numbered in seniority from 1st Grade...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007159

    Original file (20140007159.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. The FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation) shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 3 February 1943 and entered active duty on 10 February 1943. Nonetheless, in the absence of official orders or other documentary evidence confirming appointment or promotion and/or promotion to SGT there is insufficient evidence to correct his records to show this rank.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017297C070206

    Original file (20050017297C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was promoted to sergeant prior to his discharge on 30 November 1945. The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he was a private first class at the time of his discharge on 30 November 1945. Although item 38 on the applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55 shows his highest grade held was sergeant, there is no evidence of record which shows he was promoted to sergeant prior to his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003316

    Original file (20090003316.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) with the period ending 22 June 1945 by showing his rank as staff sergeant (S/Sgt, Grade 3). The applicant states that his Army Separation Qualification Record shows that he was “upgraded” to the rank of S/Sgt and that he supervised a squad of riflemen in combat, an assignment which a sergeant (Sgt, Grade 4) would not have been given. The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55...