Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003316
Original file (20090003316.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  13 August 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090003316 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) with the period ending 22 June 1945 by showing his rank as staff sergeant (S/Sgt, Grade 3).

2.  The applicant states that his Army Separation Qualification Record shows that he was “upgraded” to the rank of S/Sgt and that he supervised a squad of riflemen in combat, an assignment which a sergeant (Sgt, Grade 4) would not have been given.  He further states that he actually wore the rank of technical sergeant (T/Sgt, Grade 2) and first lieutenant (1st Lt, or O-2) on the battlefield.  The applicant states that he earned the rank and was paid as a S/Sgt when he returned to the United States.

3.  The applicant indicates that he enclosed an Army Separation Qualification Record; however, the document is not available.

4.  The applicant provides his WD AGO Form 53-55; numerous medical treatment records, with dates from November 1944 through June 1945; a Purple Heart Certificate; a Bronze Star Medal Certificate; a Certificate of Military Service, with the period ending 22 June 1945; a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 7 November 2008; and a Veterans Affairs Form 21-4138 (Statement of Support), dated 5 January 2009. 


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, this case is being considered using reconstructed records which primarily consist of his WD AGO Form 53-55, with the period ending 22 June 1945, his medical treatment records, and a WD AGO Form 371 (Final Payment Roll), dated 23 June 1945.

3.  The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he was inducted on 5 March 1943 and entered active duty on 12 March 1943.  The applicant arrived in the European Theater of Operations and was assigned to A Company, 137th Infantry on 29 June 1944.  On 12 November 1944, he was wounded in combat and entered the Army medical system.  The applicant departed the European Theater of Operations on 13 December 1945. He was eventually assigned to the Detachment of Patients, U.S. Army Hospital, Camp Pickett, Virginia.

4.  The applicant provided numerous medical treatment records, with dates from November 1944 through June 1945; that show his rank as S/Sgt.

5.  The applicant was honorably discharged with a certificate of disability on 22 June 1945.  Item 3 (Grade) of his WD AGO Form 53-55, with the period ending 22 June 1945 shows the entry "Sgt."  Item 38 (Highest Grade Held) shows the highest grade held by the applicant was Sgt.

6.  The applicant's Certificate of Military Service, created on 30 June 2005 for the period ending 22 June 1945, shows his rank as Sgt.


7.  A WD Form 371 (Final Payment Roll), dated 23 June 1945, shows the following:

SERGEANT

Trfd [Transferred] in gr[ade] fr[om] DOP [Detachment of Patients] Oliver GH [General Hospital] Augusta Ga to Pats [Patients] Det[achment] 1318th SCU [Service Command Unit] Conv[alesence] Hosp[ital] Cp [Camp] Pickett Va 10 Mar 45. . . .Due US [United States Government] Diff[erence] in pay of Sgt w/FSP [Foreign Service Pay] and pay as S/Sgt w/FSP fr 1 Oct 44 to 22 Dec 44 incl[usive] & diff in pay of Sgt w/o FSP & pay of S/Sgt w/o FSP fr 23 Dec 44 to 28 Feb 45 incl.  Sol[dier] erron[eously] pd [paid] as S/Sgt for mos [months] of Oct 44; Nov 44; Dec 44; Jan 45; & Feb 45.

In effect, the US Government collected back the difference between his pay as a S/Sgt and the pay of a Sgt with and without Foreign Service Pay because he was not entitled to the higher pay rate as he was actually a Sgt, not a S/Sgt.  The higher pay was an error.

8.  There are no orders available that show the applicant was ever promoted to the rank of S/Sgt.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant contends that his rank on his WD AGO Form 53-55 should be corrected to show the rank of S/Sgt.  The medical treatment records he provided show his rank as S/Sgt.  The Board does not dispute that the applicant wore the rank and performed the duties as a S/Sgt in combat.  However, there are no orders that show he was actually promoted to the rank of S/Sgt.  Many times the exigencies of war dictated that Soldiers had to fill in and perform the duties of the next high rank or position.  For example, a squad leader may have had to perform the duties of a platoon sergeant.  Commanders would often authorize the wearing of a higher rank insignia without actually promoting the Soldier to the higher rank.  Such Soldiers were commonly known as “Acting” Corporals, Sergeants, Staff Sergeants, etc.

2.  The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 and his Certificate of Military Service both show that he was discharged at the rank of Sgt.  Furthermore, his 
WD AGO Form 371 indicates he owed the U.S. Government the difference in pay between Sgt and S/Sgt when he received his final pay because he had been 

erroneously paid as a S/Sgt for the several months from October 1944 through February 1945.  Pay records, in the absence of personnel records, are often the best available source of information concerning a Soldier’s rank.

3.  It appears that the Army found the applicant was not officially promoted to S/Sgt and made the adjustment to his pay before his discharge.  Regrettably, lacking evidence confirming that the applicant was promoted to S/Sgt, there is insufficient evidence to correct his WD AGO Form 53-55 to show his rank as S/Sgt.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.  He is a combat infantryman; he holds the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star Medal, and the Combat Infantryman Badge.  The applicant served his country honorably and well; he is a true American hero.



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003316





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003316



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004527

    Original file (20130004527.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests, in effect, correction of the applicant's discharge documents to reflect: * Addition of the "Central Europe Campaign Award" (European-African-Middle Eastern Theater Campaign Ribbon with five bronze service stars) * battlefield promotion to second lieutenant 2. Counsel requests correction of the applicant's record to show he received a battlefield promotion to second lieutenant and was awarded the European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal with five bronze service stars....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008459

    Original file (20090008459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 for the period ending 14 March 1945 shows: a. that on 9 February 1941, he entered active duty in a PS unit; b. that his rank on the document shows private first class (PFC); c. he was authorized to wear the American Defense Service Medal with one bronze service star, Asiatic-Pacific Theater Campaign Medal with one bronze service star, Distinguished Unit Award with two Oak Leaf Clusters, Philippine Liberation Ribbon with one bronze service star, Philippine...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024052

    Original file (20100024052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel states the applicant was promoted to SGT according to records from the Provost Marshal General's Office and other documentation that are included with his application. Evidence shows the applicant's discharge document does not contain this entry. The Board requests that the ARBA, CMD – Promulgation provide administrative relief by adding to Item 55 (Remarks) of the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 "PRISONER OF WAR, Company E, 12th Infantry, 20 December 1944 to June 1945" and providing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017339

    Original file (20130017339.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Service) to show the rank of corporal (CPL) instead of the rank of private first class (PFC). The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he held the rank of PFC at the time of separation and the highest rank he held while on active duty was CPL.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063753C070421

    Original file (2001063753C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM’s Separation Qualification Record, WD AGO Form 100, shows he held the grade of Staff Sergeant. The FSM’s Certificate of Disability for Discharge, WD AGO Form 40, shows his rank as Private First Class. His WD AGO Form 53-55, item 3 shows his grade as Private First Class, item 31 indicates “not available” for his military qualifications, item 33 lists the Asiatic-Pacific Theater Medal as his only decoration, and item 38 lists his highest grade...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008367

    Original file (20100008367.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is insufficient evidence in the form of an official order, a recommendation for promotion or appointment, or other documentary evidence that shows he served in a higher grade. His reconstructed records show he held the rank of Pvt for a period of 4 months during basic training as well as during the remainder of his military service. The Board found that the additional supporting statement provided by the applicant was sufficient to show that he was, at the least, recommended for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014180C071029

    Original file (20060014180C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her applications, the applicant submitted, in three submissions, addendums to the DD Form 149s, Application for Correction of Military Record; a copy of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55; a copy of the FSM's birth certificate; a copy of an application for pension or compensation, which was submitted to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), on 4 March 1946; a copy of a page extracted from the FSM's WD AGO Form 24, Service Record; a copy of a page she identified as having been...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017218

    Original file (20120017218.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) to show he was awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge effective 26 August 1944; b. awarding him the Bronze Star Medal based on award of the Combat Infantryman Badge; and c. adding to his WD AGO Form 53-55 the: * Bronze...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005660

    Original file (20090005660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the records of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The WD AGO Form 53-55 also shows that at the time of his separation the FSM was assigned to Company D, 309th Infantry. The applicant's contention that the records of his deceased father should be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and the evidence he provided was carefully considered; however, there is insufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006974

    Original file (20140006974.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her late father's grade shown on his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge). The FSM's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. The Purple Heart orders and the letter from the Ashford General Hospital provided by the applicant showing the FSM's grade as SGT are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to base amending the...