Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012232
Original file (20080012232.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  2 December 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080012232 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his rank of sergeant be restored.

2.  The applicant states that he was ordered to leave his radio equipment aboard ship because a backpack radio would be used instead.  He was then reduced in rank from sergeant to private first class for losing his equipment.  The officer who demoted him had an intense dislike for Jewish Soldiers.

3.  The applicant does not provide any additional documents in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records could not be located, and are presumed to have been destroyed at the fire at the records repository at St. Louis, Missouri, in 1973.  The information contained herein was derived from alternative sources, primarily from the applicant's health records.

3.  The applicant was inducted on 27 June 1942 and entered active duty on 11 July 1942.  He was awarded the military occupational specialty of high speed radio operator.

4.  The applicant served in Luzon, New Guinea and the Southern Philippines and was promoted from private to private first class to technician 5 (corporal) and finally to technician 4 (sergeant).

5.  The applicant's records do not contain any information concerning his reduction in rank.

6.  On 25 December 1945, the applicant was honorably discharged for the convenience of the Government (demobilization).  His separation document shows that he was separated in the rank of private first class.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Since the applicant's records are not available to review, the reason for his reduction in rank is not a matter of record.

2.  As such, a presumption of regularity must be applied, that what the Army did was correct.  The burden for proving otherwise lies with the applicant.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is insufficient basis to grant the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080012232



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080012232



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014209

    Original file (20110014209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) to show his rank as technician fourth grade. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in an active duty status from 21 November 1942 to 14 July 1945.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011335

    Original file (20120011335.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the son of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable) to show his grade as Technical Sergeant (T/Sgt) instead of "PFC" (Private First Class). All enlisted and noncommissioned ranks were reduced from 128 different insignias and several pay grades to only seven rank insignias and seven pay grades, which were numbered in seniority from 1st Grade (highest) to 7th Grade (lowest). ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106871C070208

    Original file (2004106871C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Both the citation narrative and the orders supplied by the applicant for the Bronze Star Medal indicate that his grade was "Technician Grade 4." Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show the award of the Bronze Star Medal on his Report of Separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009465

    Original file (20070009465.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show that he reenlisted on 13 January 1950 in the grade of Technician 5th Grade instead of private first class (PFC)/pay grade E-3, as reflected in his personnel record. The applicant contends that he is entitled to correction of his records to show that he reenlisted on 13 January 1950 in the grade of Technician 5th Grade instead of private first class (PFC)/pay grade E-3, as reflected on his personnel record. Evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016523

    Original file (20070016523.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation) be corrected in item 3 (Grade) to show his grade as Technician 4th Grade (T/4). The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016523

    Original file (20070016523.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant provided evidence to show that he held the grade of Technician 4th Grade, but there is no evidence to show that Technician 4th Grade was his permanent grade. However, it would be the Army’s position that the applicant held the rank of Technician 4th Grade, albeit only as a temporary appointment, at the time of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020023

    Original file (20110020023.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests the FSM's grade be changed from "T/3" [Technician Third Grade] to "Sergeant." There is no evidence in the available records which shows the FSM held the rank of "Sergeant" prior to his discharge on 29 August 1946. All enlisted and noncommissioned ranks were reduced from 128 different insignias and several pay grades to only 7 rank insignias and 7 pay grades, which were numbered in seniority from 1st Grade...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014974

    Original file (20100014974.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her husband's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) to show his rank as a Sergeant First Class (SFC) instead of a Technical Sergeant (T/Sgt). The evidence of record shows the FSM served on active duty from 20 January 1944 through 5 June 1946. The rank "SFC" did not exist during his military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005575

    Original file (20140005575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade and date of rank of the grade held at the time of separation. The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty from 4 October 1954 to 24 September 1957.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018390

    Original file (20120018390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of her original request that the WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Records and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show his grade as that of a sergeant (Sgt) or staff sergeant (S/Sgt) instead of Technician Third Class (T/3). His WD AGO Form 100 (Separation Qualification Record) shows he held the grade of private first class for 7 months and the grade of T/3 for 10 months. The...