Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012192
Original file (20080012192.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        02 OCTOBER 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080012192 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his date of birth (DOB) and the date he entered active duty on his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect the correct dates. 

2.  The applicant states that his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects his DOB as 15 June 1948, when his DOB is actually 15 January 1948.  His DD Form 214 also reflects that he entered active duty on 28 January 1971, when it was actually 28 June 1971.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his birth certificate and DD Form 214. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in Houston, Texas on 28 January 1971 for a period of 3 years.  At the time of his enlistment, all enlistment documents indicate that his DOB is 15 January 1948.

3.  He was transferred to Fort Polk, Louisiana to undergo his basic combat training (BCT).  He successfully completed his BCT and was transferred to Fort Sill, Oklahoma on 2 April 1971 to undergo training as a supply clerk with the 17th Ordnance Company.  He remained at Fort Sill until 25 September 1972 when he was transferred to Korea.

4.  On 26 March 1973, he was discharged under honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13, for unsatisfactory performance.  He had served 2 years, 1 month and 29 days of total active service and had 10 days of lost time due to AWOL.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his discharge indicates that his DOB (block 9) was 15 June 1948 and his date of entry (block 17c) was 28 January 1971.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his DOB is incorrectly reflected on his DD Form 214 has been noted and found to have merit.  The applicant’s records clearly show that his DOB is 15 January 1948 and not 15 June 1948, as indicated.  Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to correct his DOB at this time.  

2.  However, the applicant’s contention that his date of entry in block 17c of his DD Form 214 should be 28 June 1971 instead of 28 January 1971 appears to lack merit.  The applicant’s enlistment contract shows very clearly that he entered active duty on 28 January 1971 and by June 1971, he was serving at Fort Sill.  Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to change that entry.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

__XXX __  __XXX__  __XXX__   GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing in block 9 of his DD Form 214 that his DOB is 15 January 1948. 

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to changing his date of entry to 28 June 1971.  




      ___        XXX                ___
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080012192



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080012192



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012510

    Original file (20080012510.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 be corrected to show that he entered active duty at Fort Ord, California on 24 June 1971 and not on 31 August 1977, which was his second enlistment. This regulation further states that for the entry in Block 12a (Date Entered AD [Active Duty] This Period, enter the beginning date of the continuous period of AD for issuance of this DD Form 214, for which a DD Form 214 was not previously issued. Inasmuch as the applicant had received DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011702

    Original file (20100011702.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests his records be corrected to reflect his date of birth (DOB) as 11 October 1948 and to reflect his period of service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) as 5 January 1970 through 8 January 1971. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards and Decorations), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006206

    Original file (20080006206.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Good Conduct Medal, and correction of his DD Form 214 to show the Good Conduct Medal, a Letter of Commendation, and completion of the Explosives and Demolitions Course. The applicant's records contain orders awarding him marksmanship badges which either do not appear, or incorrectly appear on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Good...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008852

    Original file (20090008852.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded an award higher than the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with “V” Device; that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 11 March 1975, be corrected to show his correct period of service, his correct date of rank (DOR), his correct date of birth (DOB), the date of his injury/wounds; and that he be provided new certificates for all of his awards and decorations. He goes on to state that his DD Form 214, dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003831

    Original file (20120003831.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 17 March 1971 he was discharged under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 due to conviction by civil authorities. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The applicant's overall record of service has been considered.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000862

    Original file (20080000862.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He goes on to state that he was lead to believe that he would be sent to Fort Gordon, Georgia for the training he had reenlisted for; however, he was instead sent to Fort Knox, Kentucky to undergo advanced individual training (AIT) as an armor crewman. On 22 November 1971, the applicant was honorably discharged from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) in the rank of SP4 and was issued an Honorable Discharge Certificate to that effect. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019762

    Original file (20100019762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 February 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100019762 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On an unknown date, the applicant's chain of command recommended the applicant be discharged by reason of unfitness under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 (Personnel Separations - Discharge - Unfitness and Unsuitability), then in effect. On 10 March 1976, the applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010034

    Original file (20080010034.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 dated 26 March 1971 incorrectly reflects that he entered active duty on 30 June 1968, when in fact he entered active duty on 27 September 1967. He was issued a DD Form 214 covering his service from 27 September 1967 to 29 June 1968. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020321

    Original file (20140020321.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract - Armed Forces of the United States), dated 28 June 1967, shows his DOB as 28 April 1948. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), created upon his entry on active duty, shows his DOB as 28 April 1948. However, as his record contains several documents that show his DOB as 26 April 1948, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Form 214 accordingly.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013247

    Original file (20100013247.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending on 21 June 1974 be corrected to show his date of birth (DOB) is 23 September 1951. The evidence of record shows upon his initial enlistment and entry on active duty the applicant listed his DOB as 23 September 1951. The evidence of record also shows upon his second period of enlistment, he listed his DOB as 23 September 1948.