Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011198
Original file (20080011198.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	 19 August 2008 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080011198 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his record of trial by summary court-martial be removed from his military records.

2.  The applicant states that the guilty verdict along with the sentence of the court-martial has been disapproved and is no longer valid.

3.  The applicant provides a memorandum from his commanding general, a Record of Trial by Summary Court-Martial (DD Form 2329), an e-mail from a lieutenant, and the document showing the removal of his suspension of favorable personnel actions.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 June 1994.  

2.  On 14 December 2007 the applicant, then serving as a staff sergeant, was convicted by a summary court-martial for two specifications of violation or Article 93, Uniform Code of Military Justice, for maltreatment of a private first class, contrary to his pleas.  His sentence consisted of a reduction to the rank of sergeant and a forfeiture of $1,753.00.




3.  On 20 December 2007, the sentence was approved and ordered to be executed.

4.  On 29 March 2008, the applicant’s commanding general disapproved the findings and sentence of the applicant’s summary court-martial.  The commanding general added that the charges will be forwarded to the applicant’s current chain of command and a rehearing on the charge for which he was convicted will be conducted, if practicable.  If the Summary Court-Martial Convening Authority determines that such a rehearing is impractical, the charge and its specifications will be dismissed.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 describes what forms and documents are to be filed in the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) and where they are to be filed.  This regulation states that if all charges and specifications contained on a DD Form 458 (Charge Sheet) are later dismissed or if all findings of guilty have been reversed in a supplemental action, all related documents from the Performance (P) Section are transferred to the Restricted (R) Section.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicable Army regulation specifies that if all charges and specifications are later dismissed or if all findings of guilty have been reversed in a supplemental action, all related documents are removed from the P Section and transferred to the R Section.

2.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  The information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.

3.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, those records should not be changed.

4.  Since the removal of his record of summary court-martial would be in contravention of Army regulation, to remove those documents would be providing him with a benefit not afforded to other soldiers in like situations.  The applicant has not provided any evidence or argument which would warrant granting him such a benefit. 

5.  While the transfer of the record of summary court-martial from the P Section to the R Section of his OMPF is administrative, it would be expedient for the Board to direct that transfer to insure the applicant’s military career is not adversely affected by that document.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by transferring the record of summary court-martial from the P Section to the R Section of his OMPF.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to removing the record of summary court-martial from his records.




      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080011198





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080011198



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019512

    Original file (20090019512.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There are no provisions provided under Army Regulation 27-10 (Military Justice) or Army Regulation 600-37 (Unfavorable Information) for the removal or transfer of a DD Form 2329 to the R section of the OMPF. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014154

    Original file (20090014154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Special Court-Martial Order Number 141, dated 15 August 2005, and Special Court-Martial Order Number 94, dated 1 May 2006, be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Special Court-Martial Order Number 141, dated 15 August 2005, shows the applicant was convicted of two specifications of maltreatment and one specification of obstructing justice and the sentence was set aside on 2 August 2005. Special Court-Martial Order Number 141,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011732C070206

    Original file (20050011732C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Linda D. Simmons | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. This supervisor supports transferring the GCM order in question to the R-Fiche of the applicant’s OMPF to allow for the applicant’s advancement in the Army. The GCM order in question is filed in the P-Fiche of his OMPF in accordance with the applicable regulation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019591

    Original file (20080019591.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, removal of his General Court-Martial from the performance section of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) and from his Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) and that it be filed in the restricted section of his OMPF. He wants the court-martial removed to the restricted section of his OMPF so that it does not negatively prejudice his consideration for promotion. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006741

    Original file (20120006741.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of his summary court-martial from his official military personnel file (OMPF) or transfer to the restricted section of his OMPF. The applicant provides two statements of support. In this regard, the OMPF serves to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, duty performance, evaluation periods, and any corrections to other parts of the OMPF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011864

    Original file (20120011864.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests his court-martial record: * be removed from his Official Military Personnel Record (OMPF), or * be transferred from his performance (P) fiche to his Restricted (R) fiche 2. The applicant has done that.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00850

    Original file (BC 2014 00850.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 August 2013, the CAAF set-aside the United States Court of Criminal Appeals (AFCCA) decision to affirm the guilty finding with respect to the Charge and Specification 2, committing indecent acts upon the body of female under the age of 16, because the specification failed to state an offense and the government failed to provide notice of the missing element during its case- in-chief. Specifically, AF Form 4363, which states the reasons for the Promotion Propriety Action lists both...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007196

    Original file (20090007196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that Headquarters, 1st Infantry Division General Court-Martial (GCM) Orders Number 38, dated 29 November 2002, be removed from his Official Personnel Military File (OMPF). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005914

    Original file (20120005914.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of a summary court-martial that he received in 1967 from his Army records. The available records do not contain a DD Form 2329 (Record of Trial by Summary Court-Martial). ________X_______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013467

    Original file (20070013467.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided a self-authored letter, dated 15 September 2007; a copy of General Court-Martial Order Number 2, dated 5 January 2001; and two letters of recommendation from his battalion commander and battalion command sergeant major (CSM), in support of his application. Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) of this Army regulation shows that General Court-Martial Orders are filed on the P fiche when there is an approved finding of guilty on at least one specification. As a result,...