Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010388
Original file (20080010388.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        17 September 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080010388


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that reentry (RE) code of “4” be changed to at least RE-3.

2.  The applicant states he wants to join the National Guard and his RE-4 code prevents it.  He wants to serve his country again and he regrets his past mistakes.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) and his General Discharge Certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 6 years on 28 August 2001.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman).  he was assigned to Company A, 3rd Battalion, 21st Infantry Regiment (Gimlets), Fort Lewis, WA.

3.  A random unit urinalysis test revealed that, between 4 November and
4 December 2002, the applicant used marijuana.  He was offered and accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, on 4 January 2003.  As punishment for wrongfully using marijuana he was reduced from private (PVT/E-2) to private (PVT/E-1), made to forfeit $575.00 pay per month for 2 months (suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before 15 April 2003), restricted for 45 days, and made to perform extra duty for 45 days.

4.  On 10 April 2003, the applicant's company commander initiated action to discharge him with a General Discharge for misconduct under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14.  He acknowledged receipt of notification on the same date.

5.  On 14 April 2003, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and acknowledged that he understood the basis for the contemplated administrative separation, the effects of such an action, and the rights available to him.  He also acknowledged the possible effects of a general discharge.  He declined to submit a statement in his own behalf.

6.  On an unknown date, the applicant's company commander forwarded his recommendation for discharge through the chain of command to the approving authority.  On 22 April 2003, the approving authority approved the request and directed the applicant be issued a General Discharge Certificate.

7.  The applicant was discharged on 7 May 2003.  He had 1 year, 8 months, and 10 days of creditable service on his 6-year enlistment.  His DD Form 214 shows the separation authority as "AR 635-200, PARA[GRAPH] 14-12C(2)."  The narrative reason is shown as "MISCONDUCT" and the Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code is shown as "JKK."  The RE code is shown as "4" which means ineligible to reenlist.

8.  Pertinent Army Regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Army.  Chapter 3 
prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment, and includes a list of armed forces RE codes.  RE-4 applies to individuals who are ineligible to reenter the Army.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  Table 2-3 (SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table), Army Regulation 635-5-1, establishes RE Codes to be assigned for each SPD code.  SPD "JKK" is used for RA Soldiers discharged under the provisions of chapter 14, AR 635-200.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that an RE code of RE-4 is the correct code.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant would like his RE code changed to one that would permit him to join the National Guard.

2.  The applicant was discharged from the Regular Army for misconduct because he violated Army rules, regulations, and policies by abusing illegal drugs.  Use of illegal drugs is completely counter to Army values and the expected behavior of Soldiers and renders the applicant unfit for future service.

3.  The applicant’s discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time, and the character of his discharge is appropriate to his misconduct and commensurate with his overall record of military service.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__XXX __  __XXX__  __XXX__   DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___        XXX                ___
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010388



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010388



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021517

    Original file (20100021517.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests correction of the applicant's records as indicated on his application. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged on 11 May 2005. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the service at the time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010390

    Original file (20080010390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 February 2006, the applicant was formally charged with being AWOL. Pertinent Army Regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant's voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009902

    Original file (20080009902.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Table 2-3 (SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table), Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect, at the time, established RE code 3 as the proper reentry code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14 for misconduct. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005165

    Original file (20090005165.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003146

    Original file (20090003146.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander advised the applicant of his right to consult with counsel, submit statements in his own behalf, obtain copies of documents that would be sent to the separation authority supporting the proposed separation, to waive any of these rights, and to withdraw any waiver of rights at any time prior to the date the discharge authority directs or approves his separation. On 27 January 2005, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007100

    Original file (20090007100.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 July 2002, the applicant’s immediate commander notified the applicant of his intent to initiate separation action against him in accordance with paragraph 14-12(c) of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) for misconduct citing his wrongful use of cocaine. On 13 October 2006, the ADRB granted the applicant relief in the form of an upgrade of his discharge to fully honorable. The "JKK" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under chapter 14-12(c) of Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001257

    Original file (20080001257.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states his discharge was upgraded but his RE code was not changed. The applicant's military personnel record shows he enlisted, at the age of 21, in the Regular Army on 2 August 2000 for a period of 4 years. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes), then in effect, prescribed the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007220

    Original file (20100007220.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities, the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD code to be used for these stated reasons. The regulation shows that the SPD of JKK as shown on the applicant's original DD Form 214 is appropriate for voluntary discharge when the narrative reason for discharge is Misconduct (Drug Abuse) and the authority for discharge is Army Regulation 635–200,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005168

    Original file (20090005168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 4 years on 3 April 2001. Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The SPD code of "JKK" is the correct code for Soldiers separated under the provisions of chapter 14-12(c) of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of misconduct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012820

    Original file (20130012820.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction to the narrative reason for his Reentry (RE) Code from an RE-4 to a more favorable code so he can reenter military service. On 15 September 2005, the applicant’s immediate commander initiated separation action against him in accordance with paragraph 14-12(c) of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) for misconduct, commission of a serious offense. The separation authority ultimately approved the separation action in accordance with chapter 14 of...