Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009919
Original file (20080009919.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        14 AUGUST 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080009919 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states that he served as an infantryman in Vietnam and earned the CIB; however, it is not listed on his DD Form 214. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army at Fort Jackson, South Carolina on 3 June 1964 for a period of 3 years.  He completed his training at Fort Gordon, Georgia and was awarded the military occupational specialty of a light weapons infantryman.  He was transferred to Fort Hood, Texas for his first duty assignment.

3.  He remained at Fort Hood as a rifleman until he was transferred to Vietnam on 29 May 1965 for assignment to the United States Army Military Assistance Command – Vietnam (MACV) for duty as a security guard.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 23 September 1965.  

4.  He departed Vietnam on 25 May 1966 and was transferred to Fort Gordon.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 21 October 1966 and he was transferred to Fort Benning, Georgia on 13 January 1967 for duty as a squad leader.

5.  On 2 June 1967, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) due to the expiration of his term of service.  He had served 3 years of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD indicates that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.  

6.  A review of the applicant’s records fails to show that the applicant was ever awarded the CIB or that he was assigned to an infantry unit in Vietnam.  

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and procedures concerning awards.  Paragraph 8-6 provides for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.  That paragraph states that there are basically three requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.  Specific requirements state, in effect, that an Army enlisted Soldier must have an infantry specialty, satisfactorily performed duty while assigned or attached as a member of an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during any period such unit was engaged in active ground combat.  A recipient must be personally present and under hostile fire while serving in an assigned infantry primary duty, in a unit actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy.

8.  The United States Military Assistance Command, Vietnam (MACV) was the United States’ unified command structure for all of its military forces in South Vietnam during the Vietnam War.  Because of the many headquarters units in its locale, Tan Son Nhut Air Base, near Saigon, MACV was called Pentagon East. 



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2.  While the sincerity of the applicant’s contention that he earned the CIB is not in doubt, there simply is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was ever awarded the CIB or that he was assigned to an infantry unit that engaged the unit in actual combat in Vietnam.    

3.  Therefore, in the absence of such evidence, there appears to be no basis to award him the CIB at this time.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__XXX __  __XXX__  __XXX__   DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___        XXX                ___
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080009919





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080009919



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001237

    Original file (20080001237.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his awards of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and any other awards to which he is entitled and were not listed on his DD Form 214. However, after carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it was determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 21 June 1965 through 12 June 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040006687C070208

    Original file (040006687C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and must actively participate in such ground combat. One of the applicant’s efficiency reports indicate that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, although there is no evidence to show that award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009571

    Original file (20140009571 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. The regulation authorized award of the Combat Infantryman Badge to radio/telephone operators provided their primary duty was to accompany infantry or infantry-type units on tactical operations. A review of the available evidence failed to show that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010265

    Original file (20110010265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he should have been awarded the CIB because he was an infantryman serving in an infantry unit that engaged the enemy in ground combat. Therefore, in the absence of substantiating evidence to show that he engaged the enemy in ground combat in Vietnam, there appears to be no basis to grant his request for award of the CIB. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009334

    Original file (20110009334.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Accordingly, the CIB should be added to his records at this time. The evidence of record also shows the applicant was awarded three awards of the BSM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006015

    Original file (20080006015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his father, a deceased former service member (FSM) be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). He was transferred to Germany on 9 March 1956 and despite being reclassified to a maintenance warrant officer MOS, he was assigned to an armored cavalry regiment for duty as a personnel officer. There is also no evidence to show that he received combat infantry pay or that he was ever recommended for award of the BSM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006120

    Original file (20080006120.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect his assignment to a Pathfinder Unit in Vietnam, his pathfinder training, his award of the Pathfinder Badge, and that he be awarded the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), and the Republic of Vietnam Cross of Gallantry. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was awarded the Pathfinder...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022843

    Original file (20110022843.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). There is no evidence of record and he did not provide any evidence that he served in ground combat and was awarded the CIB while serving in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010054

    Original file (20080010054.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his rifle qualification badges. There are no orders in the applicant's record to show he was recommended for or awarded the CIB. Paragraph 8-6 of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010081

    Original file (20080010081.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He had served 3 years of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. The applicant has not provided and the records do not contain orders awarding the applicant the CIB for his service in Vietnam. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the...