Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008691
Original file (20080008691.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        31 July 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080008691 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the reentry eligibility (RE) code 4 on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with the ending period 1 February 2006 be changed to an RE code that would allow him to be eligible to reenlist.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that due to the injustice he performed on himself that the authorities with the power to do so should give him the opportunity to serve in the U.S. Army once again.  He states that he made mistakes in his conduct as an infantryman and hopes he can serve his country again.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant had prior service in the Army National Guard.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 September 2003.  

2.  On 7 October 2004, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for wrongful use of cocaine.

3.  On 9 May 2005, the applicant accepted NJP under Article 15, UCMJ for wrongful use of marijuana.


4.  On 25 August 2005, the applicant was convicted, by a summary court-martial, of wrongful use of marijuana.  His sentence consisted of a forfeiture of two thirds of his pay for 1 month and confinement for 30 days.

5.  On 2 October 2005, the applicant’s commander initiated elimination action on the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14 for misconduct.  The reason cited by the commander was the applicant's testing positive for cocaine and being disrespectful and insubordinate towards his first sergeant.

6.  On 2 October 2005, the applicant was advised by consulting counsel of the basis for the contemplated separation action.  The applicant was advised of the impact of the discharge action.  The applicant signed a statement indicating that he was advised he was being recommended for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200.  With advice from counsel the applicant requested a waiver of his right to an administrative board conditioned on receiving a general under honorable conditions discharge.

7.  On 12 December 2005, the appropriate authority disapproved the conditional waiver.  

8.  On 20 December 2005, with advice from counsel the applicant submitted an unconditional waiver of his right to an administrative separation board with the understanding that he could receive an under other than honorable discharge.  He waived his right to have a separation board, representation by military counsel, and elected not to submit a statement on his own behalf.

9.  On 5 January 2006, the appropriate authority approved the recommendation and directed the applicant receive an under other honorable conditions discharge. On 1 February 2006, he was discharged after completing 2 years, 
3 months, and 17 days of creditable active service during that enlistment with 
30 days of lost time due to being in confinement.

10.  The applicant's DD Form 214 with the period ending 1 February 2006 shows he was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c(2), Army Regulation 635-200, for "MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE)"; item 27 (Reentry Code) shows the entry "4"; and item 26 (Separation Code) shows a separation code of JKK.

11.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Paragraph 14-12c(2) states that Soldiers are subject to separation for commission of a serious offense (abuse of illegal drugs) and that abuse of illegal drugs is serious misconduct.  

12.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  The SPD code of JKK was the appropriate code for the applicant based on the guidance provided in this regulation for Soldiers separating under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c(2), Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of misconduct - drug abuse.  Additionally, the SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table establishes RE code 4 as the proper reentry code to assign to Soldiers with an SPD of JKK.  

13.  An RE code 4 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service and the disqualification is non-waivable.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he needs his RE code changed on his DD Form 214 in order to reenter military service.  However, the ABCMR does not change RE codes solely to allow former Soldiers to reenter military service.  

2.  Evidence of record shows that the applicant was separated from the service for misconduct (four instances of drug abuse) under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14-12c(2).  By regulation, this mandated that he be assigned an RE code 4 upon his separation from the Army.

3.  The evidence of record confirms that the applicant’s separation processing was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulations, to include the RE code 4 code assignment.  Lacking independent evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  Therefore, the assigned RE code 4 was appropriate.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___xx___  __xx____  __xx____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______xxxx _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008691



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008691



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022453

    Original file (20100022453.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    e. On 20 April 2007, a telephone conference with his commander and supervisor revealed that in addition to using illegal drugs, he had also continued to drink to intoxication while enrolled in ASAP. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general discharge under honorable conditions. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010243C080407

    Original file (20070010243C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Stone | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The DD Form 214 further confirms that at the time of his discharge, he held the rank of PV1 and he had completed a total of 11 months and 8 days of active military service. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was separated under the provisions of Paragraph 14-12c, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense (drug abuse)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007125

    Original file (20080007125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the record of his Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) hearing and associated documents in support of his application. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was separated under the provisions of Paragraph 14-12c, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense (abuse of illegal drugs) based on his multiple incidents of illegal use of marijuana and cocaine. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014080

    Original file (20070014080.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 March 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070014080 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned reentry codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The regulation shows that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016553

    Original file (20070016553.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribed the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD codes to be used for these stated reasons. Pertinent Army regulations provide that, prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001974

    Original file (20080001974.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 September 2006, the applicant was informed that he was being processed for separation under the provisions of chapter 14, Army Regulation (AR) 635-200 for misconduct (drug abuse). Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. A separation code of "JKK" applies to persons who are separated under the provisions of chapter 14, Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018880

    Original file (20080018880.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 4 June 2008, the applicant's commanding officer informed him that he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 14 (Separation for misconduct), paragraph 14-12c (Commission of a serious offense). The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that an RE code of "4" is the applicable RE code assigned for individuals separated for this reason. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023575

    Original file (20100023575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code JKK is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), by reason of misconduct (drug abuse). His record shows he accepted nonjudicial punishment for wrongfully using cocaine and his reason for separation was misconduct (drug abuse). As such, evidence shows he was properly discharged and his separation code was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023097

    Original file (20100023097.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An honorable or a general discharge may be awarded by the separation authority if warranted by the member's overall record of service; however, an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate for members separated under these provisions. Table 3-1 included a list of the RA RE codes: a. RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army. Although his mental status evaluation indicated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011054

    Original file (20090011054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 August 2006, a mental status evaluation was conducted on the applicant who was being considered for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 14, because of misconduct. The DD Form 214 also shows that his character of service was general, under honorable conditions; the separation authority was Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c (2); the separation code was "JKK"; his RE code was...