Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008668
Original file (20080008668.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  17 July 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080008668 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was issued the CIB based on Special Orders Number 261, dated 23 September 1968.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of Headquarters, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment, Special Orders Number 261, dated 23 September 1968; and three discharge documents.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  After having had prior enlisted service, the applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer on 1 November 1966 in the Armor Branch.  He was concurrently called to active duty.  His appointment letter shows his primary specialty number as 1203 (Tank Unit Commander).

3.  The applicant was assigned to Vietnam on 20 April 1968 with Headquarters, 3rd Squadron, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment.

4.  The applicant provided a copy of Headquarters, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment, Special Orders Number 261, dated 23 September 1968, which show he was awarded the CIB.  These orders show his primary specialty as “1203.”

5.  Item 21 (Awards and Decorations) on his DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record), authenticated on 7 July 1969, lists award of the CIB.  The CIB entry was lined through and shows a handwritten entry of “Rescinded.”  

6.  His DA Form 66 shows he performed duties in specialty number 1204 (armored reconnaissance unit commander) as a Platoon Leader and 59301 as an Assistant S-2 during his tour in Vietnam.  

7.  The applicant was released from active duty on 6 September 1973 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) on the following date.  

8.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 6 September 1973 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Good Conduct Medal, the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device (First Oak Leaf Cluster), the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), the Purple Heart, and the Bronze Star Medal.  

9.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation Number 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) specifically governed award of the CIB to Army forces operating in South Vietnam.  This regulation specifically stated that criteria for award of the CIB identified the man who trained, lived, and fought as an infantryman and the CIB is the unique award established to recognize the infantryman and only the infantryman for his service.  This regulation also stated the CIB was authorized for award to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS) and required that they must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was appointed in the Armor Branch as a Tank Unit Commander in primary specialty 1203.

2.  The applicant’s Officer Qualification Record shows he performed duties as a Platoon Leader and Assistant S-2 with an armored cavalry unit during his tour in Vietnam.  There is no evidence of record which shows he held or performed infantry duties in active ground combat in Vietnam or that he was an infantryman. Therefore, he has not met the requirements for award of the CIB.  

3.  Although the applicant has provided special orders for award of the CIB, it appears that these orders were revoked.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_xx_____  ___xx___  ___xx___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



	__________xxxx_________
      	CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008668



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008668



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030114

    Original file (20100030114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations), in effect at the time, did not authorize Armor/Air Cavalry officers award of the CIB although they may have served as Aero Medical Rifle Platoon Commander. The commanding officer then assigns appropriate duties. Absent any evidence of record showing that the applicant held and served in an infantry specialty in ground combat with a qualifying infantry unit during his RVN tour, or that he was awarded the CIB by proper...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022176

    Original file (20100022176.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states, in effect, that he was assigned to Company D, 5th Battalion, 7th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division and he served as a combat platoon leader while assigned to Vietnam. There are no orders in his service personnel records awarding him the CIB. The applicant's contention that his military records should be corrected to show award of the CIB was carefully considered and determined to have merit.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076044C070215

    Original file (2002076044C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show the Combat Infantryman Badge as an authorized award. His DA Form 66 also shows he served as Senior Advisor with the Military Advisory Team II-19 of the United States Military Assistance Command from April 1968 to October 1968. Evidence of record shows the applicant served as a Senior Advisor of the Mobile Advisory Team II-19 during his tour in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004019

    Original file (20090004019.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 June 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090004019 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Combat service alone did not support award of the CIB. The evidence of record in this case confirms that although the applicant served in a qualifying unit while serving in the RVN, he did not hold and serve in an infantry MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006538

    Original file (20110006538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The fellow Soldier attests: * he served with the applicant in the Army at Fort Hood, TX, and in Vietnam * he and the applicant served in Troop C, 1st Squadron, 1st Cavalry, 1st Armored Division, at Fort Hood, TX, from approximately January 1967 until their deployment to Vietnam in August 1967 * the applicant functioned and served in the capacity of an armored intelligence specialist in MOS 11D * cavalry troopers assigned to armored cavalry assault vehicles (ACAV's) carried MOS 11B (Light...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060017047C071029

    Original file (AR20060017047C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 July 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060017047 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant goes on to state that the retired colonel believes that he should be awarded the CIB for his action in the fire fights that he participated in while he was a member of the LRRP serving as an infantryman. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003926

    Original file (20090003926.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS). There is no evidence to show what subordinate unit of the 11th ACR the applicant was assigned to. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002029

    Original file (20140002029.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows his unit was awarded the PUC; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this unit award. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the CIB and correct his DD Form 214 to show this badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 19 May 1969 through 14 October 1970 * deleting award of the VSM from his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003390

    Original file (20110003390.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show: * award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) * his blood type (also known as blood group) "O-" 2. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting: * the VSM from item 214 of his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002047

    Original file (20140002047.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of: * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) * Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) * All other awards he is authorized 2. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that...