IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 31 July 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080008570
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his uncharacterized characterization of service be changed to honorable.
2. The applicant states that he never received his honorable discharge papers. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) does not say what kind of discharge he received.
3. The applicant provides copies 1 and 4 of his DD Form 214; his discharge orders; and a DA Form 4707 (Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) Proceedings).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 July 1992.
3. On 26 January 1993, an EPSBD found the applicant to be fit for retention but unfit for enlistment due to an EPTS (existed prior to service) condition. The board recommended he be expeditiously separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11.
4. On 5 February 1993, the applicant concurred with the EPSBD proceedings and requested to be discharged from the Army without delay.
5. On 23 February 1993, the applicant was discharged, with an uncharacterized characterization of service, after completing 6 months and 23 days of creditable active service.
6. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-11 sets the policy and prescribes procedures for separating members who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty. Medical proceedings, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate military medical authority within 6 months of the Soldiers initial entrance of active duty that would have permanently or temporarily disqualified him or her for entry into the military service or entry on active duty had it been detected at that time and does not disqualify him or her for retention. Unless the reason for separation requires a specific characterization, a Soldier will be awarded an uncharacterized description of service if in an entry-level status. (For Regular Army Soldiers, entry-level status is the first 180 days of continuous active duty.)
7. Department of Defense Directive 1332.14, Subject: Enlisted Administrative Separations, states that, for the purposes of characterization of service or description of separation, the member's status is determined by the date of notification as to the initiation of separation proceedings.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
The applicant's administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would tend to jeopardize his rights. Because his separation proceedings were initiated on 26 January 1993, he was still in an entry-level status. Therefore, he was properly given a characterization of service of uncharacterized.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___xx___ ___xx___ ___xx___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
________xxxx___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080008570
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080008570
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003056
He also requests award of the Army Service Medal (correctly known as the Army Service Ribbon) and the "A.O.S.M." On 31 July 1991, the applicant concurred with the EPSBD Proceedings in Item 21 (Action by Service Member) of the DA Form 4707 and requested to be discharged from the Army without delay. Army Regulation 635-200 states that unless the reason for separation requires a specific characterization, a Soldier will be awarded an uncharacterized description of service if in an entry-level...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007707
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldiers initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006643
The applicant was discharged on 13 June 1989 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11 by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards with an entry level status uncharacterized discharge. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldiers initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018312
The applicant provides copies of the following: * Standard Form (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination) * SF 93 (Report of Medical History) * SF 513 (Medical Record Consultation Sheet) * Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) Information memorandum * Medical 200 Board summary * DA Form 4707 (EPSBD Proceedings) * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The regulation stated in: a. Paragraph 5-11 - Soldiers who were not medically...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019024
The EPSBD found that the applicant had an unstable left knee and accordingly recommended her separation from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Separations), paragraph 5-11, separation of personnel who did not meet procurement medical fitness standards. A medical proceeding conducted by an EPSBD, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within 6 months of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011268
The applicant requests an upgrade of his uncharacterized discharge to an honorable discharge. The DD Form 214 issued upon his discharge shows he was separated under the provisions Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Separations), paragraph 5-11, by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards and he received an "uncharacterized" description of service. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010381
The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Release from Active Duty (REFRAD) Order * DA Form 4707 (Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) Proceedings) * DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The EPSBD found the applicant medically unfit for enlistment and as a result, recommended his separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018837
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon his discharge shows he was discharged under the provisions Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Separations), paragraph 5-11, by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards, and he received an "Uncharacterized" description of service. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090018837 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004508
The EPSBD found that the applicant failed to meet medical procurement standards and accordingly recommended his separation from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-11, separation of personnel who did not meet procurement medical fitness standards. A medical proceeding conducted by an EPSBD, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000578
The applicant requests to upgrade his uncharacterized discharge to an honorable discharge. Paragraph 5-11 specifically provided that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entrance on active duty, active duty for training, or initial entry training would be separated. Army Regulation 635-200 also stated a medical proceeding, regardless of the date...