Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008559
Original file (20080008559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  11 September 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080008559 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that military occupational specialty (MOS) 
91A (Medical Equipment Repairer) and MOS 91E (Dental Hygienist) should be  added to Item 23a of his separation document (DD Form 214).  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that MOS 91A and MOS 91E should be added to his DD Form 214. 

3.  The applicant provides his Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) and DD Form 214 in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant's record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 21 August 1961, and completed advanced individual training (AIT) in MOS 91A on 23 November 1961.

3.  Item 23 (Military Occupational Specialties) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he was awarded MOS 42D (Dental Lab Specialist) on 24 March 1962, MOS 91E on 20 April 1967, and MOS 42F (Dental Fixed Prosthetic Specialist) on 16 October 1967.  This item further shows that MOS 42F was his primary MOS (PMOS) and MOS 91E was his secondary MOS (SMOS) at the time of his discharge.  

4.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows that the applicant was assigned to an MOS 42F position on 5 January 1967, and that he continued to work in that MOS through his release from active duty on 29 June 1969.  Item 38 contains no entries indicating the applicant was ever assigned to an MOS 91A or 91E position during his active duty tenure.  

5.  On 29 June 1969, the applicant was honorably discharged, in the rank of specialist six (SP6), after completing a total of 7 years, 10 months, and 9 days of active military service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at that time contains the entry 42F20 in Item 23a, and the applicant authenticated the separation document with his signature in Item 32 (Signature of Person Being Transferred or Discharged) on the date of his discharge.  

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The version of the regulation in effect at the time of the applicant's discharge stated to enter the primary MOS held on the date of separation in Item 23a.  There were no provisions for entering secondary or additional MOSs.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that MOS 91A and MOS 91E should be included in Item 23a of his DD Form 214 was carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim.  

2.  The regulation in effect at the time provided for entering only the PMOS held on the date of separation in Item 23a of the DD Form 214.  There were no regulatory provisions for entering secondary or additional MOSs in effect at the time of the applicant's discharge.  

3.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant completed AIT in MOS 91A and that he was awarded MOS 91E as a SMOS on 20 April 1967.  However, his record of assignments fails to show he was ever assigned to a position authorized either of the MOSs in question.  As a result, given the regulation in effect at the time of his discharge provided no provisions for entering secondary or additional MOSs in Item 23a of the DD Form 214, and since it appears he never actually worked in position authorized either of the MOSs in question, there appears to be no error or injustice related to the MOS entry on his DD Form 214. Therefore, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief. 

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ x_   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008559



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008559



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007704

    Original file (20140007704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 23 (Specialty Number and Title) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United Report of Separation or Discharge). The applicant provides: * Separation Order * Amendment Order * DD Form 214 * EA Form 7 (Individual Training Record) * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant was initially trained in and awarded PMOS 11B1O on 1 December 1967 and for most of his military service this was the only MOS...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023627

    Original file (20100023627.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It also contains separation orders issued by the United States Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, Washington on 30 June 1971 that lists his MOS as 71F in the standard name line. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he held MOS 71F on the date of separation. Given the applicant was properly awarded and held PMOS 71F on the date of his REFRAD it would not be appropriate to revoke this MOS or delete all references to it from the record and DD Form 214 as requested by the applicant.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002441

    Original file (20130002441.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows he held MOS 05B45 as his PMOS; however, the evidence of record shows he held MOS 05B4S as his PMOS. Special orders awarded him MOS 05B2S based on his successful completion of the Special Forces Qualification Course. The evidence of record shows he completed the infantry MOS course during AIT; therefore, it would be appropriate to amend item 25 of his DD Form 214 to show this completed course.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002162

    Original file (20120002162.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 shows his specialty number and title as 67H (Cargo Handler). Item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was awarded secondary MOS (SMOS) 61C on 1 June 1967 and primary MOS (PMOS) 57H (Cargo Handler) on 5 December 1967. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting from item 23a of his DD Form 214 the entry "67H2O...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012793

    Original file (20060012793.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the entries at Item 11 (Primary Specialty) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) be corrected. The records show the applicant entered active duty on 16 February 1973, completed training, and was awarded the MOS 11B. Item 11, on the 28 February 1995 DD Form 214, shows service in MOS 11B5O of 0 years and 0 months and in MOS 63B5O of 17 years and 2 months.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002200

    Original file (20140002200 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his correct military occupational specialty (MOS) and that he was promoted to pay grade E-5. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded PMOS 16C2O while on active duty, and promoted to pay grade E-5 and awarded PMOS 13B4O while in the USAR. However, there are no orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded MOS 16C2O as his PMOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010851

    Original file (20090010851.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that the Bronze Star Medal does not appear on his DD Form 214, that his PMOS was 97B4O, and that his secondary MOS (SMOS) was 96B4O. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 23a of his DD Form 214 the entry "96B4O Intelligence Analyst" and replacing it with the entry "97B4O Intelligence Specialist"; b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | AR20080000750

    Original file (AR20080000750.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 23a, of his DD Form 214, shows the entry, "91Q2O (Pharmacist)." Item 38 (Record of Assignment), of his DA Form 20 shows he served as a pharmacist, in MOS 91Q2O. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted in MOS 11B, Light Weapons Infantryman, with a BS Degree in Pharmacy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003676

    Original file (20130003676.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Special Orders Number 92, issued by Headquarters, 210th Combat Aviation Battalion, dated 27 July 1967, withdrew his Primary MOS (PMOS) of 11C and awarded him PMOS 76U and Secondary MOS (SMOS) 11C, under the provisions of Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management), effective 17 May 1967. It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214, which provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018476

    Original file (20080018476.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's DA Form 20 shows he served in the RVN from 4 August 1970 through 15 March 1972. The applicant's record contains no orders awarding him either the BSM or the PH, and neither of these awards is included in the list of earned awards contained in Item 41 of his DA Form 20 or Item 24 of his DD Form 214.