Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007459
Original file (20080007459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        29 JULY 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080007459 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that item 16 (High School Graduate or Equivalent) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed to show that he was a high school graduate or equivalent. 

2.  The applicant essentially states that it was his understanding that he received the equivalency of a high school education while he was in the Army because of the training and schooling he received.  He also states, in effect, that he has since completed a trade school and now has an associate degree in electronics.

3.  The applicant provides a diploma, dated 30 October 1987, from the Golden State Schools showing that he satisfactorily completed the course requirements in advanced electronic technology and received a certificate, which expired on 
29 February 1992, from the International Society of Certified Electronics Technicians in support of this application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 March 1979.  His enlistment contract shows, in pertinent part, that he only attended high school from March 1978 to February 1979 at the Mountain Alternative High School in Ontario, California, and that he did not graduate.  He completed basic and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 36C (Wire Systems Installer/Operator).  He departed for a tour in Germany on 27 July 1979; however, on 24 September 1980, he was discharged due to failure to maintain acceptable standards for retention under the Expeditious Discharge Program of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel), and was issued a general discharge.

3.  Item 16 of the applicant's DD Form 214 has an "X" in the "No" block.  

4.  The applicant essentially stated that it was his understanding that he received the equivalency of a high school education while he was in the Army because of the training and schooling he received.  He also stated, in effect, that he has since completed a trade school and now has an associate degree in electronics.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, provided guidance on the preparation of entries on the DD Form 214.  It essentially provided that if a Soldier has a General Equivalency Diploma (GED), check the "Yes" block.  

6.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  This regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that item 16 of his DD Form 214 should be changed to show that he is a high school graduate or equivalent. 

2.  While the applicant contends that his Army training was the equivalent of a high school education, it in fact was not.  As it appears the applicant only completed 1 year of high school prior to entering the Army.  He did not complete high school or receive a GED while on active duty.  Therefore, item 16 of his DD Form 214 accurately represents that he was not a high school graduate or equivalent at the time of his discharge on 24 September 1980.  The fact that he subsequently completed some education is noteworthy; however, that education does not entitle him to retroactive correction of item 16 of his DD Form 214.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting relief to the applicant in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__XXX __  __XXX__  __XXX__   DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___        XXX                ___
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007459



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007459



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000822

    Original file (20110000822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States), DA Form 3286 (Statements for Reenlistment), and AE Form 1385-R (Statement), show the applicant reenlisted in the RA for a period of 4 years on 10 October 1979. a. A Standard Form 180 (Request Pertaining to Military Records) and letter from the applicant show the applicant requested correction of his DD Form 214 to show his GED high school equivalency. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019149

    Original file (20140019149 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he obtained his General Educational Development (GED) while serving on active duty and item 16 of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect "yes" instead of "no." The applicant's military record includes a DD Form 1966/2 (Record of Military Processing – Armed Forces of the United States) prepared during his enlistment processing. The DD Form 1966/2 prepared during the applicant's enlistment processing and the DA Form 2-1 completed upon his entry on active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004306

    Original file (20090004306.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that item 12f (Foreign Service) and item 16 (High School Graduate or Equivalent) on his 1980 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show he served 6 months in Germany and that he completed his General Education Diploma (GED). According to item 5 (Oversea Service) on his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II), the applicant, while assigned to Fort Hood, was sent to Germany with his unit in a temporary duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013457

    Original file (20080013457.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no indication in the applicant’s records that he was advanced beyond the rank/grade of PV2/E-2 during his active military service. Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicant’s DA Form 2-1 shows the applicant’s ranks and dates of rank as follows: PVT/E-1, 9 May 1977; PV2/E-2, 10 November 1977; PVT/E-1, 7 March 1978; PV2/E-2, 1 March 1979; PVT/E-1, 28 September 1979; and PV2/E-2, 17 March 1980. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show he completed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019329

    Original file (20130019329.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    For item 28e (Education) the recruiter indicated he reviewed the applicant's GED (general education development) and a high school letter. The entry in item 18i and the recruiter's verification of the applicant's education on his DD Form 1966 indicate that it was known at the time of his enlistment he had his GED. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the "X" in the NO block of item 15b of his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013357

    Original file (20090013357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, corrections of Item 5 (Date of Birth) and Item 16 (High School Graduate or Equivalent) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). He was issued a DD Form 214 that shows in Item 5, his year of birth as 1956. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001260

    Original file (20130001260.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * her DD Form 214 * a State of Louisiana Department of Education Official Results of GED Test, dated 19 June 1980 * Louisiana High School Equivalency Diploma, dated 27 June 1980 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct her DD Form 214 to show she completed her GED during her military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011012

    Original file (20120011012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he received his GED certification in June 1981 at Fort Bliss, TX; however, it was not indicated on his DD Form 214. His military record does not contain any evidence to show he received his GED certification. _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020398

    Original file (20130020398.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 15b (High School Graduate or Equivalent) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he obtained a high school diploma. The applicant states that he is a high school graduate and item 15b of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect "yes" instead of "no." The DD Form 1966/2 prepared during the applicant's enlistment processing and the DA Form 2-1 completed upon his entry on active duty both confirm he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015868

    Original file (20110015868.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 11 of his DD Form 214 shows his MOS as "76Y1O." Army Regulation 611-1 (Military Occupational Classification Structure Development and Implementation) states the first three characters of an MOS identify the MOS and the fourth and fifth characters denote the skill and grade level of the MOS. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged in the rank of PVT/E-1 and his MOS was 76Y1O.