Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007407
Original file (20080007407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        21 AUGUST 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080007407 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states that he was to supposed to receive the Purple Heart; however, it was not recorded on his Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214).  He states that he never really accepted the Purple Heart because he believed some day he would be a helicopter pilot and remain in the Army.  He states that after 2 years and 3 months of serving his country he failed what was his biggest disappointment ever, which was his hearing test for flight school.  He states that he was discharged shortly thereafter and that when he was being discharged, he was asked again to accept the Purple Heart.  He states that he was very proud to be a Soldier and that he was not going to accept defeat.  He states that now, years later, he is rated 100 percent disabled due to a combat related injury.  He states that he suffers from hearing loss, post traumatic stress disorder or ringing of the ears that he hears every day so bad that it just screams at you.  He states that he also has shrapnel wounds.  He goes on to state that he was told to swallow his pride and to put in for his Purple Hearts.  He states that two of his injuries were treated by field medics and that he was medically evacuated for his back injury.

3.  The applicant provides in support of his application a statement regarding his injuries; a copy of General Orders Number 2490 awarding him the Army Commendation Medal; a copy of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating 



Decision Continuation Sheet; a copy of Clinical Record notes; a copy of a Reenlistment Data Card (DA Form 1315); a copy of a VA Report of Medical Examination for Disability Evaluation; and a copy of his VA Rating Decision.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 12 February 1968, the applicant enlisted in the Army in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for 3 years, in the pay grade of E-1.  He successfully completed his training as a combat engineer.  He was transferred to Vietnam on 20 June 1968. 

3.  A review of the available records does not show that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action while he was in Vietnam.

4.  The applicant returned to the Continental United States on 20 September 1970.  

5.  After completing 2 years, 7 months and 12 days of total active service, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 23 September 1970, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5, due to early separation of overseas returnee.  He was transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group to complete his Reserve obligation.

6.  The DD Form 214 that the applicant was furnished at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign w/five Oak Leaf Clusters, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross w/Palm Unit Citation, the Good Conduct Medal, the Bronze Star Medal and the Air Medal.



7.  A review of the Vietnam Casualty Listing does not show that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action while he was in the Army.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2.  The applicant's contentions and the documentation that he submitted have been noted.  However, although his documents show that he currently has injuries, there is no evidence in the available records, nor has the applicant submitted any evidence to show that he was wounded as a result of hostile action while he was in the Army.

3.  The applicant's contention regarding his VA disability rating has also been noted.  However, a service connected disability rating by the VA does not constitute award of the Purple Heart.

4.  Additionally, a review of the Vietnam Casualty Listing does not show that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action while he was in the Army and, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that what the Army did in his case was correct.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__XXX __  __XXX__  __XXX__   DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___        XXX                ___
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007407



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007407



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000406

    Original file (20080000406.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 September 1967, the applicant returned to dispensary and his sutures were removed. This regulation also provides that there are no time limitations for requests for award of the Purple Heart. Although the record does show that the applicant was injured while he was in Vietnam, there is no evidence in the available record, nor has the applicant submitted any evidence to show that any of his injuries were the result of hostile action by enemy forces.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009470

    Original file (20080009470.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. In accordance with the criteria for award of the Purple Heart his accidental injury, while tragic, does not qualify for award of the Purple Heart. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006380

    Original file (20080006380.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the Purple Heart, but it does not show that he was awarded the Purple Heart with First Oak Leaf Cluster to signify a second award of the Purple Heart. While the sincerity of the applicant's claim to entitlement to a second award of the Purple Heart is not in question, there is no evidence in his military records, and the applicant failed to provide any evidence which shows that he was wounded or injured a second time as a result of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005960

    Original file (20080005960.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. As a result, there is no evidence in the applicant's military records, and the applicant failed to provide evidence which conclusively shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009390

    Original file (20080009390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The available record does not contain any general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart. His DA Form 20 does not show any entries for wounds sustained in hostile action. In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008614

    Original file (20080008614.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show the award of the Purple Heart. The applicant's military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 19 June 1969. While the sincerity of the applicant's claim to entitlement to award of the Purple Heart is not questioned, there is no evidence in the applicant's military records, and the applicant failed to provide any evidence which shows that he was wounded or injured as a result...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005265

    Original file (20080005265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant essentially requested that he be awarded the Purple Heart with First Oak Leaf Cluster, and provided a Clinical Record Cover Sheet which essentially shows that he was treated for a dislocated shoulder on 1 June 1971 which he sustained when he jumped from a helicopter while closing in on a landing zone. A check of the Vietnam Casualty Roster shows that there is only one entry showing that the applicant was wounded in action, that being on 3 July...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006908

    Original file (20080006908.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states, in effect, that being a medic at that time, he did not wish to accept award of the Purple Heart. Further, there is no evidence in his military personnel records which shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action. While the sincerity of the applicant's claim to entitlement to award of the Purple Heart is not questioned, there is no evidence in the applicant's military records, and the applicant failed to provide any evidence which shows that he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005755

    Original file (20080005755.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20070005273, on 14 August 2007. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. However, notwithstanding the fact that the DVA awarded the applicant compensation for a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010255

    Original file (20080010255.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was already awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) on 1 December 1967. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to show the applicant is entitled to award of the Purple Heart and to have his record corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the Purple Heart for wounds sustained in the...