IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  22 JULY 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080006908 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant essentially states that he was wounded by fragments of a rocket-propelled grenade (RPG), as was another Soldier who lost his leg as a result.  He also states that being a medic, he was the first to attend to the other Soldier's wounds while still under fire without realizing that he was injured.  He further states, in effect, that being a medic at that time, he did not wish to accept award of the Purple Heart.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 6 March 1969.  He completed basic and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 91A (Medical Corpsman), and was later awarded MOS 91B (Medical Specialist).  After initially serving a permanent duty assignment at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, he departed for the Republic of Vietnam on 12 April 1970.  He returned to the continental United States in February 1971, and was honorably released from active duty on 15 February 1971.  The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) that he was issued at the time of his release from active duty shows that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with M-14 Rifle Bar and M-16 Rifle Bar.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show that he was awarded the Purple Heart.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not contain any entries that indicate he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this same document also does not show that he was awarded the Purple Heart.  There are no orders in his military records awarding him the Purple Heart, and a search of the United States Army Human Resources Command Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, a web-based index containing roughly 611,000 general orders issued between 1965 and 1973 for the Vietnam era, also failed to produce any orders awarding him the Purple Heart.  Additionally, the applicant’s name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.   Further, there is no evidence in his military personnel records which shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action.

4.  The applicant essentially stated that he was wounded by fragments of an RPG, as was another Soldier who lost his leg as a result.  He also stated that being a medic, he was the first to attend to the other Soldier's wounds while still under fire without realizing that he was injured.  He further stated, in effect, that being a medic at that time, he did not wish to accept award of the Purple Heart, but is now seeking its award.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have been treated by military medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official records.  Each approved award of the Purple Heart must exhibit all of the 

following factors: wound, injury or death must have been the result of enemy or hostile act; international terrorist attack; or friendly fire; the wound or injury must have required treatment by military medical personnel; and the record of medical treatment must have been made a matter of official Army records.  

6.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  This regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he should be awarded the Purple Heart.

2.  While the sincerity of the applicant's claim to entitlement to award of the Purple Heart is not questioned, there is no evidence in the applicant's military records, and the applicant failed to provide any evidence which shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for wounds or injuries sustained as a result of hostile action, and that this medical treatment was made a matter of official record.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for awarding him the Purple Heart in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__XXX __  __XXX__  __XXX__   DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




      ___        XXX                ___
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006908



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006908



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1