Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007382
Original file (20080007382.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  24 July 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080007382 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart (PH).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), he was wounded after being hit from friendly fire in the vicinity of firebase Ripcord.  He also states that he is unsure of why he was never awarded the PH for the injuries he sustained; however, he believes that at the time every one was to busy with body count and trying to find dog tags to concern themselves with him being awarded the PH.  

3.  The applicant provides his separation document (DD Form 214) in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows he enlisted into the Regular Army and entered active duty on 19 March 1968.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 36K (Field Wireman), and specialist four (SP4) is the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty. 

3.  The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows he served in the RVN from 9 November 1969 through 16 July 1970.  During his RVN tour, he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Brigade, 101st Airborne Division, performing duties in MOS 36K as a field wireman.  Item 40 (Wounds) is blank and the PH is not included in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations).   

4.  The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) contains a Clinical Record Narrative Summary (SF 502), dated 9 December 1970.  This document states that while serving in the RVN on 4 July 1970, the applicant was injured by a falling flare canister which struck the lateral aspect of the right femur.  

5.  On 26 March 1971, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) after completing 3 years and 8 days of active military service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure:  National Defense Service Medal; Vietnam Service Medal, RVN Campaign Medal, and Parachutist Badge.  The PH is not included in the list of awards contained on the DD Form 214, and the applicant authenticated the separation document with his signature on the date of his REFRAD.  

6.  During the processing of this case, a member of the Board staff reviewed the Department of the Army (DA) Vietnam Casualty Roster.  The applicant's name was not included on this casualty list.  The staff member also reviewed the 
DA Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), which contains award orders issued during the Vietnam Era.  There were no orders pertaining to the applicant on file.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards.  Paragraph 2-8 contains the regulatory guidance pertaining to awarding the PH.  It states, in pertinent part, that in order to award a PH there must be evidence that a member was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action, that the wound required treatment by a medical officer and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  The regulation states that award of the PH for friendly fire is authorized when the member is wounded by weapon fire while directly engaged in armed conflict, and was the result of an act by the enemy.  It further provides examples of wounds or injuries that clearly do not support award of the PH, which includes accidental wounding not related to or caused by enemy action.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he should have been awarded the PH for being wounded by friendly fire while serving in the RVN was carefully considered. However, by regulation, in order to award a PH, it is necessary to establish that a member was wounded in action that the wound required treatment by a medical officer, and this treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  Further, the regulation stipulates that PH for friendly fire is authorized when the member is wounded by weapon fire while directly engaged in armed conflict, which was the result of an act by the enemy.  It further provides examples of wounds or injuries that clearly do not support award of the PH, which includes accidental wounding not related to or caused by enemy action.

2.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant was injured on 4 July 1970, by a falling flare canister.  However, there is no indication that at the time of this accident, the applicant was directly engaged in action with the enemy, or that it was the result of enemy action.  Although the accident that resulted in his injuries was unfortunate, absent any evidence that the accident occurred while the applicant was engaged in action against the enemy, the friendly fire criteria necessary to support award of the PH has not been met.  

3.  Further, the applicant's record is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority. The PH is not included on his DA Form 20 or on his DD Form 214, and his name is not included on the Vietnam Casualty Roster, the official DA list of RVN battle casualties.  Absent any evidence that he was ever treated for a combat related wound or injury while serving on active duty, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the PH has not been satisfied in this case.  Thus, it would not be appropriate or in the interest of all those who served in the RVN and who faced similar circumstances to grant the requested relief in this case.  

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.   

5.  The applicant and all others concerned should know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.  


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x ____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




 _   _____x__   ______________
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007382



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007382


2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008044

    Original file (20110008044.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. Based on a preponderance of the evidence, the applicant meets the criteria for the award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 23 January 1970; and c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000333

    Original file (20080000333.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 April 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080000333 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. It states, in pertinent part, that in order to award a PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that the wound required medical treatment by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014459

    Original file (20140014459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was told by those in command that he was not authorized a PH because he was wounded as a result of friendly fire * he meets the regulations for the PH under friendly fire pursuant to Title 10 U.S. Code (USC), Section 1129 (Purple Heart: members killed or wounded in action by friendly fire) * when he left Vietnam, his local command informed him they had lost his medical records and he also has post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) * he also tried to find reports or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018243

    Original file (20110018243.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He had completed 2 years of active duty service. There is insufficient evidence to substantiate a shrapnel injury to his neck caused by enemy or friendly fire. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075404C070403

    Original file (2002075404C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. APPLICANT STATES : He was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019618

    Original file (20080019618.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of her application: Self-Authored Statement; Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA) Letter, dated 25 August 2008; Certificate of Death; Certificate of Marriage; United States Army Human Resources Command (HRC) Letter, dated 31 January 2008; Certificates of Release or Discharge From Active Duty (DD Forms 214); Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decisions, dated 25 May 2006 and 17 December 2007; Bronze Star Medal (BSM) Citation;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085193C070212

    Original file (2003085193C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was wounded in action by friendly fire on 12 August 1969, while serving on green line duty (inside perimeter) in the RVN during an enemy penetration. Therefore, the Board concludes that the applicant is entitled to the PH and that it would be appropriate to award it to him and add it to his record at this time. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013829

    Original file (20080013829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) includes an entry in Item 31 (Foreign Service) that shows he served in the RVN from 12 October 1969 through 16 February 1970. The PH guidance contained in the awards regulation further states that accidents, to include accidental wounding, not related to or caused by enemy action clearly do not qualify for award of the PH. Item 40 of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank, which indicates he was never wounded in action, and the PH is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012736

    Original file (20060012736.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060012736 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. His Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005166

    Original file (20130005166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 40 (Wounds) of this form would have listed any combat injuries and the date. These are: a. DA Form 8-275-3, dated 22 April 1966, shows he was admitted to the 106th General Hospital on 19 March 1966 after being transferred from the 85th Evacuation Hospital due to vertigo, caused by a blast and deafness in both ears. Therefore, regrettably, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those...