Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075404C070403
Original file (2002075404C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 26 September 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002075404

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Mr. Raymond J. Wagner Member
Ms. Karen Y. Fletcher Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be awarded the Purple Heart (PH).

APPLICANT STATES: He was told that he was not awarded a PH because his wounds were a result of friendly fire. He contends his wounds were not the result of friendly fire. He was wounded as a result of a Vietcong booby trap. Notwithstanding his contention that he was not wounded as a result of friendly fire, he questions why he did not receive a PH for friendly fire when other soldiers have received the PH for obvious friendly fire wounds, citing a recent incident in which soldiers serving in Afghanistan who were wounded by an errant U.S. bomb were awarded the PH.

In support of his application he submits a copy of a picture which he describes as him being awarded the PH. He also submits a statement from his unit's medic, who states that the applicant was wounded when an ammo dump they were in the process of destroying exploded. The medic states that the explosion was the result of a booby trap. Finally, the applicant submits a telegram to his parents informing them that he was hospitalized due to shrapnel wounds to his left shoulder with resultant fracture of his left upper arm.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

That he was inducted and entered on active duty on 15 May 1968, was awarded the military occupational specialty of light weapons infantryman, and was promoted to pay grade E-4. He served in Vietnam from 9 December 1968 to 2 May 1969.

While in Vietnam, a Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status was completed on the applicant's "Fragment wound, left shoulder; fracture, left shoulder." In item 30 of the form, Details of Accident – Remarks, the applicant's commander stated that the applicant " . . . was part of a detail stacking ammo to be destroyed, when a fire started from an unknown cause, possibly a trip flare. The resulting explosion inflicted wounds on the members of the detail."

The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 25 May 1970 at the expiration of his term of service. His separation document shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars, the Vietnam Campaign Medal with 1960 Device, the Combat Infantryman Badge, and marksmanship qualification badges.






Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

Included as part of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for fiscal year 1994 was an amendment to the rules governing award of the PH. While the original rules established that the PH would be awarded to individual's killed or wounded as a result of hostile action the amendment enabled the Secretaries of each department to award the PH to members of the armed forces who were killed or wounded in action by weapon fire, while directly engaged in armed conflict, other than as the result of an act of an enemy of the United States. This ruling, in effect, granted the service Secretaries the authority to award the PH to individual directly engaged in armed conflict who were killed or wounded as a result of "friendly fire."

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant was wounded as a result of an explosion at an ammo dump. The explosion was caused by a fire of unknown origin. Without evidence showing that the fire and resulting explosion was the result of enemy action, there is no basis to award the applicant the PH.

2. Since there is no evidence which shows that the explosion was anything but accidental, the friendly fire aspect of the applicant's contentions is not germane to his request. However, the Board has opted to reference the legislation which changed the criteria for the PH to include friendly fire incidents to show the history of the decoration.

3. The Board has carefully considered the picture of the applicant being awarded the PH, the statement from the applicant's unit's medic, and the telegram to his parents informing them that the applicant was hospitalized due to shrapnel wounds. However, there is insufficient evidence to show that the picture is of the applicant being awarded the PH. The assessment by the unit's medic of what occurred on the day the applicant was injured does not carry as much weight as the commander's official determination, as reflected by his comments on the applicant's Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status. The telegram only verifies that the applicant was injured and hospitalized for his injury.




4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

___rjw___ ___kyf__ ___rvo___ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002075404
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20020923
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02716

    Original file (BC 2014 02716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02716 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The casualty report of his father’s death be corrected to reflect “battle-related” and his father be awarded the Purple Heart Medal (PH). By his heroic actions and unselfish dedication to duty in the service of his country, Sergeant has reflected great credit on himself and the United States Air Force.” The PH...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000485

    Original file (20130000485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. An artillery round jungle pack exploded. The letters of support and other evidence provided by the applicant has been reviewed; however, there was no investigation conducted at the time of the incident to show the explosion was the direct result of enemy action (a booby-trapped artillery round).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000092C070205

    Original file (20060000092C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, dated 29 January 1988, which lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam, shows that the unit the applicant was assigned to, 1st Battalion, 22d Infantry Regiment, 4th Infantry Division, was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross, with Palm, Unit Citation, for the period 1 August 1965 through 16 April 1971, by Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) Number 54, dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013121C080407

    Original file (20070013121C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    During its original review of the case, the Board found no evidence that the applicant's wounds were the result of hostile action, and that the evidence showed the applicant accidentally detonated a friendly mechanical ambush device, which caused his injury. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was wounded in action in the RVN on 25 August 1970, when a mechanical ambush devise was accidentally detonated. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012770

    Original file (20080012770.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he sustained shrapnel wounds during a mortar and rocket attack on the evening of 26 March 1969 while stationed at Dong Tam base camp in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The applicant contends, in effect, that his request for award of the Purple Heart should be reconsidered based on new evidence he presents concerning shrapnel wounds he sustained during a mortar and rocket attack on the evening of 26 March 1969 while stationed at Dong Tam base camp in the RVN. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003230

    Original file (20120003230.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and Army Good Conduct Medal. He would like to be awarded a Purple Heart for wounds received in combat in Vietnam on 9 June 1970. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017773

    Original file (20140017773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Personnel wounded as a result of non-hostile action who are not placed on hospital's very seriously injured lists are not reported as casualties in accordance with current regulations. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. There is no available evidence and he did not provide sufficient evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071915C070403

    Original file (2002071915C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant provides a statement from Colonel (retired) C___, who was the applicant’s unit’s senior advisor in February 1967. He confirmed that the applicant was wounded about the hands and wrists as a result of a grenade booby trap and had ordered the applicant to return with the medical evacuation helicopter.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02089

    Original file (BC-2002-02089.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should be awarded the PH based on wounds he received in 1944, when a booby trap exploded. There is no evidence in the applicant’s medical or personnel records which proves he was injured as a direct result of enemy action. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, we are not persuaded that his injuries were the direct result of enemy action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000163

    Original file (20150000163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. In this case, the evidence of record shows the applicant was involved in an accidental discharge of a weapon by another Soldier and he later received treatment for this injury.