Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006625
Original file (20080006625.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        21 OCTOBER 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080006625


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states that on or about 17 January 1968, while assigned to 2d Battalion, 11th Artillery Regiment in Bien Hoa, he was assigned to guard duty during the week of the TET Offensive.  He goes on to state that during that week they received mortar and rocket attacks by the enemy and on one night an ammunition depot was hit and numerous pieces of shrapnel and debris were spread over the compound.  He continues by stating that the next morning they were instructed to pick up debris around their bunkers and one of the pieces he picked up looked like the end of an exploded artillery shell and detonated in his hand when he picked it up.  He further states that his hand was treated by an Army Corpsman and with follow-up treatment for 6 to 8 weeks thereafter for removal of packing and small pieces of debris; however, he was not awarded the Purple Heart.

3.  The applicant provides four pictures, one which appears to be an artillery projectile and three showing a Soldier (presumably the applicant) with a bandaged left hand.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was born on 29 July 1947 and enlisted in Louisville, Kentucky, on 10 August 1967 for a period of 3 years and training in the automotive repair career management field.

3.  He completed his basic combat training at Fort Knox, Kentucky, and was transferred to Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, to undergo his advanced individual training (AIT) as a wheel vehicle mechanic.

4.  He completed his AIT and was transferred to Vietnam on 12 January 1968 for assignment to the 11th Artillery Regiment.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 16 April 1968.

5.  He departed Vietnam on 10 January 1969 and was transferred to Fort Campbell, Kentucky.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 26 June 1969.

6.  On 29 January 1970, he was transferred to Germany.  However, he only remained there until 7 April 1970, when he was transferred to Fort Knox.  He remained at Fort Knox until 7 August 1970, when he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) due to the expiration of his term of service (ETS).  He had served 2 years, 11 months and 28 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD reflects that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.

7.  A review of the available records, to include the Vietnam Casualty Listing, fails to show any evidence that the applicant was wounded as a result of enemy action, that he was treated by medical personnel and that the treatment was made a matter of record, or that he was reported as a casualty.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim that he was injured as a result of enemy action and that he was treated for those injuries is not in doubt, there simply is no evidence in the available records to support his claim and the photos submitted by the applicant are not sufficient in themselves to establish his claim.

2.  Therefore, in the absence of medical evidence to establish that he was injured as a result of enemy action and was treated for such injuries, there is no basis to award him the Purple Heart at this time.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting relief to the applicant in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________XXX_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006625



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006625



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086688C070212

    Original file (2003086688C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, his records do show that he was awarded a temporary physical profile for temporary duty restrictions due to multiple fragment wounds – (L) Hand and Wrist: contusion of left median nerve. Although the applicant's medical records are not available for the Board to review, the Board finds it reasonable to presume that he was in fact wounded in action against the enemy on 19 June 1970, the date he was evacuated. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040006349C070208

    Original file (040006349C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A 13 November 1944 medical report prepared by a doctor of Company C, 109th Medical Battalion, indicates that the applicant had a lacerated wound to the third finger of his right hand accidentally incurred when he fell on broken glass on 31 October 1944 near Crosetto, Italy. While the Board has no reason to doubt the statement of events he has provided regarding his wound, the medical evidence clearly shows that his wound was accidental, and not as a result of hostile action. The evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022411

    Original file (20110022411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states after caring for the seriously injured point-man the applicant was treated by the field medic for what seemed to be cuts, abrasions, and minor shrapnel wounds. The applicant was injured but he would not go and get checked out by the medic. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that conclusively shows he was injured as a result of hostile action and treated for that injury.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007614

    Original file (20100007614.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He states his DD Form 214 does not show the Purple Heart being awarded to him due to actions during an attack on Fire Base Bastogne. There are no orders in his military personnel records awarding him the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007173

    Original file (20080007173.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He successfully completed his AIT and was transferred to Vietnam on 11 October 1969 for assignment to Battery B, 2nd Battalion, 77th Artillery Regiment, 25th Infantry Division. The applicant clearly was awarded the three ARCOMs and is entitled to have his records corrected to reflect his award of the ARCOM with “V” Device and 2OLC. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that the applicant was awarded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000402C070205

    Original file (20060000402C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 August 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060000402 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. John Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075371C070403

    Original file (2002075371C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records to show he was wounded in action. There is no evidence of record to show the applicant met the eligibility criteria for award of the Purple Heart. A review of the historical files of the unit's Daily Staff Journal for the two dates mentioned by the applicant failed to show the unit came under artillery or mortar attack on those dates.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014580

    Original file (20130014580.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for shrapnel wounds he received in Vietnam on 6 April 1971. While the sincerity of the applicant's claim that he was wounded in action in Vietnam is not in doubt, he failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record that he was treated for his injuries and that the treatment was made a matter of record. ____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059332C070421

    Original file (2001059332C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his deceased brother, a former service member (FSM) be awarded the Purple Heart. Each approved award of the Purple Heart must exhibit substantiating evidence to verify that the death was a result of hostile action and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016788

    Original file (20070016788.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 also shows that, at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 2d Battalion, 320th Artillery, it was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 18 March 1968 through 2 May 1970 by DAGO Number 48, dated 1971. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 also shows that, at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 1st Battalion, 321st Artillery, it was cited for award of the Republic of...