IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 14 AUGUST 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080006182
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states that the Purple Heart should have been awarded to him for his head injury received in Vietnam during a rocket attack on 10 May 1968 as indicated on the Standard Form 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care) contained in his records.
3. The applicant provides no additional documents with his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant was inducted at Fort Hamilton, New York on 25 September 1967 and was transferred to Fort Jackson, South Carolina to undergo his basic combat training (BCT). He completed his BCT and was transferred to Fort Polk, Louisiana to undergo his advanced individual training (AIT) as a light weapons infantryman.
3. He completed his AIT and was transferred to Vietnam on 3 March 1968 for assignment as cadre at the Screaming Eagle Replacement Training School (SERTS). He was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 8 March 1968 and to the pay grade of E-4 on 11 November 1968.
4. On 11 February 1969, the applicant submitted a request to extend his tour in Vietnam for a period of 56 days so as to qualify for a 150-day early release from active duty. His request was approved on 13 February 1969.
5. He departed Vietnam on 28 April 1969 and was transferred to Fort Dix, New Jersey, where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 30 April 1969. He had served 1 year, 7 months and 6 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Army Commendation Medal (meritorious service) and the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service.
6. A review of the applicants Enlisted Qualification Record fails to show that the applicant received any wounds. Additionally, his name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Listing and his separation physical makes no mention of any wounds or injuries received in Vietnam.
7. A review of the medical records contained in the applicants Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) shows two separate SF Form 600s dated 10 May 1968 which indicate that the applicant received a head injury. One of the forms shows that it was from enemy action and the other indicates that it occurred during a rocket attack. The two forms are not consistent with other SF Form 600s contained in his records which are chronologically annotated and they are not authenticated by a medical officer.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. While the sincerity of the applicants claim that he was wounded/injured in Vietnam as a result of enemy action is not in doubt, there is insufficient evidence to corroborate his claim.
2. The documents cited by the applicant are not consistent with other medical documents contained in his records and there are not the usual corroborating entries in his records that normally serve to substantiate a Soldiers wounds/injuries.
3. Additionally, it is noted that the applicant worked in a replacement depot environment, that he remained in the same environment for almost a year after the incident in question and no mention was made on his separation medical and physical examination. Additionally, he was not reported as a casualty, no annotation of wounds received in action against the enemy was made on his records and no indication that a medical officer verified his treatment.
4. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to establish the validity of the two documents in question, there appears to be insufficient evidence to award him the Purple Heart at this time.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__XXX __ __XXX__ __XXX__ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
2. The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War. The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.
___ XXX ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080006182
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080006182
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022453
Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110014555, on 12 January 2012. It also states in order to award the Purple Heart there must be evidence of the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020142
Counsel states: a. the applicant's medical records show he was treated for wounds received during a rocket attack during the night of 13 and/or 14 April 1969; b. that Army Regulation 600-8-2 states in: (1) paragraph 2-8f, "when contemplating an award of this decoration, the key issue that commanders must take into consideration is the degree to which the enemy caused the injury. The applicant submitted: a. a letter to HRC, dated 18 January 2013, requesting retroactive award of the Purple...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017284
His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his discharge indicates that he was awarded the Purple Heart. A review of the available records fails to show any evidence, other than the handwritten entry on his DA Form 20, that the applicant was wounded on 13 August 1969. Evidence shows that the applicants records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004255
The applicant requests correction of his military records by awarding him the Purple Heart and showing it on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). A SF Form 93 (second page only), dated 1 August 1976 and provided by the applicant, shows that the applicant had reported receiving shrapnel wounds while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. The evidence provided by the applicant reports that he had received shrapnel wounds during an enemy rocket and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003528
His record contains a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) that shows in: a. item 38 (Record of Assignments) he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service; b. item 40 (Wounds) contains no entry (blank); c. item 41 (Awards and Decorations) the entry: * National Defense Service Medal * Air Crewman Badge * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Air...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008124
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's DD Form 214 with the period ending 16 June 1968 covers his service in Vietnam. There also is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows that he was treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014914
This form also states that no evidence the Purple Heart was awarded at this hospital. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 22 May 1970 in the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006625
He further states that his hand was treated by an Army Corpsman and with follow-up treatment for 6 to 8 weeks thereafter for removal of packing and small pieces of debris; however, he was not awarded the Purple Heart. However, he only remained there until 7 April 1970, when he was transferred to Fort Knox. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017162
Counsel requests the applicant be awarded the Purple Heart. He contends the previous decision by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) is in error because it identified an entry on the SF 600 with a date of 15 July 1968, when it was actually 15 June 1968. In support of this application, the applicant's counsel provided an SF 502, a DA Form 8-274, and a letter addressed to the applicant's Representative in Congress as new evidence which was not previously considered by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020521
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Although his separation physical examination document notes shrapnel wound to his left forearm, there is no corroborating evidence that shows he met the criteria for award of the Purple Heart. __________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army...