Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006146
Original file (20080006146.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        3 September 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080006146 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was on active duty during the Vietnam conflict and award of the Army Service Ribbon.

2.  The applicant states that the error precludes him from receiving benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA).

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 14 December 1966; and a flyer from the San Juan, Puerto Rico DVA Regional Office, describing the requirements to request a pension.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he enlisted in the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) on or around 1 May 1965.  He completed 1 year,
3 months, and 9 days of prior service in the PRARNG when he was called to and entered active duty for training (ACDUTRA) on 15 August 1966.  He completed
4 months of ACDUTRA and was honorably released from active duty on
14 December 1966 and returned to the State control as a member of the PRARNG to complete his remaining military service obligation. 

4.  The applicant's reconstructed records do not reveal the applicant completed any other periods of active duty.

5.  Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal.  Item 26 does not show award of the Army Service Ribbon.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) shows that the Army Service Ribbon was established by the Secretary of the Army on 10 April 1981.  This regulation states, in pertinent part, that effective 1 August 1981, all members of the Active Army, Army National Guard, and Army Reserve in an active Reserve status are eligible for the award upon successful completion of initial entry training.  The award may be awarded retroactively to those personnel who completed the required training before 1 August 1981 provided they had an Active Army status on or after 1 August 1981.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted in the PRARNG in or around May 1965.  He entered active duty for training on 15 August 1966, completed 4 months of active duty for training, and was honorably released from active duty on 14 December 1966 to the control of the PRARNG.  There is no evidence in the applicant's records and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows he completed any other period of active duty.  Therefore, there is no correction required.

2.  With respect to award of the Army Service Ribbon, this award was established on 10 April 1981.  Effective 1 August 1981, all members of the Active Army, ARNG, and Army Reserve in an active Reserve status are eligible for the award upon successful completion of initial entry training.  The award may be awarded retroactively to those personnel who completed the required training before 1 August 1981 provided they had an Active Army status on or after 1 August 1981.  However, there is no evidence that the applicant served on active duty after 1 August 1981.  Therefore, he does not meet the requirements for award of the Army service Ribbon.

3.  The Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) does not correct records solely for the purpose of establishing eligibility for other programs or benefits.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant did not submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.  Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to relief. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__xxx___  __xxx___  __xxx___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


															XXX
      ______________________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006146



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006146



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20080016245

    Original file (AR20080016245.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military personnel records show he enlisted in the ARNGUS and PRARNG for a period of 6 years on 12 January 1972 and was ordered to active duty for training (ACDUTRA) on 25 May 1972. The evidence of record shows that, on 13 July 2007, orders were issued that discharged the applicant from the ARNGUS and PRARNG on 13 May 2007 and transferred him to the USAR Control Group (Retired Reserve) effective 14 May 2007. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018866

    Original file (20070018866.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her service in Southwest Asia as “1990 11 29 to 1991 06 25” instead of "1991 10 01 to 1992 06 25.” 2. She was subsequently ordered to initial active duty for training on 15 November 1974. In view of the foregoing evidence, it appears that the applicant served in Southwest Asia from 2 January 1991 to 25 June 1991 and is therefore entitled to correction of her record to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017328

    Original file (20130017328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 April 2006, he signed Annex E to DD Form 4, Enlistment Bonus Addendum, Army National Guard of the United States. He signed a DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States) on 14 January 2008, applying for enlistment in the PRARNG. A DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, Armed Forces of the United States) shows he enlisted in the PRARNG for a period of 7 years, 7 months, and 18 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000715

    Original file (20080000715.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant's first name is Jose. He initially enlisted in and was separated from the PRARNG under the first name Jose; his (second) DD Form 214, dated 29 November 1957, shows his first name Jose; his birth certificate shows his first name as Jose; and he used the first name Jose throughout his entire military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007050

    Original file (20080007050.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests adjustment of his initial appointment date to warrant officer one (WO1) in the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG), from 4 February 2008 to 21 March 2006; promotion to chief warrant officer two (CW2); and restoration of back pay and allowances as a result of this adjustment. National Guard Regulation 600-101 (Warrant Officer - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) provides procedures for processing applications for Federal recognition. The evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010605

    Original file (20080010605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be paid the $15,000.00 Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (PSEB) for which he enlisted under the Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP). d. A copy of his NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) showing that, with no prior service, he served in the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) from 26 August 1986 through 1 September 2001, a total of 15 years and 6 days. The G-1 advisory opinion recommends paying the applicant a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022535

    Original file (20110022535.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he was commissioned through the State Officer Candidate School (OCS) on 25 August 2009 * his NGB Form 0122E (Special Orders Number 255 AR), dated 19 October 2011, shows his initial appointment effective date as 4 March 2011 * his Federal Recognition packet was never submitted to the National Guard Bureau (NGB); therefore he was not given his Federal Recognition * 16 months after asking about his promotion to first lieutenant (1LT), he discovered he had never received...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067802C070402

    Original file (2002067802C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) be revoked and that the record not show that he was absent without leave (AWOL) on 26-27 September, 3-4 October, and 10-12 October 1998. Paragraph 1-4 states that, "All involuntary administrative discharges require commanders to notify soldiers concerning intent to initiate discharge procedures. Insofar as records of the Puerto Rico Army National Guard are concerned, the ABCMR recommends...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017878

    Original file (20070017878.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) as follows: 1. show an additional 40 days served on active duty in 1969; and 2. add his awards and decorations. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not provide any substantiating evidence that shows he was called to or served on active duty. With respect to the applicant's awards and decorations, there is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not provide...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014465

    Original file (20090014465.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) and transfer to the Retired Reserve be voided and that he be processed through the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES). While it cannot be determined based on the available evidence the extent of the applicant's disabilities at the time of his REFRAD and discharge, there is sufficient evidence to show he was being treated for depression while on active duty and prior to his...