Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007050
Original file (20080007050.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  29 May 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080007050 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests adjustment of his initial appointment date to warrant officer one (WO1) in the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG), from 4 February 2008 to 21 March 2006; promotion to chief warrant officer two (CW2); and restoration of back pay and allowances as a result of this adjustment.

2.  The applicant states that he was appointed in the PRARNG on 21 March 2006 and subsequently attended the Aviation Warrant Officer Basic Course; however, due to an administrative error, he was not extended permanent Federal recognition for his initial appointment until 4 February 2008.

3.  The applicant provided the following additional documentary evidence in support of his application: 

	a.  National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognitions Examining Board), dated 21 December 2005 and 4 February 2008.

	b.  DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 14 June 2007.

	c.  Orders 42-78, dated 7 March 2006, appointing him in the Army National Guard.

	d.  Applicant's Oaths of Office, dated 21 March 2006 and 4 February 2008.

	e.  Orders 060-510, dated 29 February 2008, appointing him in the Army National Guard.

	f.  National Guard Bureau (NGB) Federal Recognition Special Orders Number 70 AR, dated 14 March 2008, initial appointment.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 21 December 2005, a Federal Recognition Board was held by the PRARNG to determine if the applicant was qualified to be awarded Federal Recognition.  The proceedings indicated that the applicant was satisfactory in his physical qualifications, moral character, and general qualifications.  

2.  On 7 March 2006, the Joint Forces Headquarters of the PRARNG, San Juan PR, issued order number 42-78, for appointment of the applicant as a WO1 effective 7 March 2006; however, these orders were subsequently amended to show the effective date of appointment 21 March 2006.  

3.  The applicant accepted an appointment as a WO1 in the PRARNG and executed an oath of office on 21 March 2006, and was granted temporary Federal recognition.

4.  There is no evidence that the applicant received permanent Federal recognition as a WO1 from the National Guard Bureau within the six month period required by National Guard/Army regulations.  As a result his temporary Federal recognition expired.

5.  On 14 June 2007, the applicant completed the Aviation Warrant Officer Basic Course.

6.  On 4 February 2008, a second Federal Recognition Board was held by the PRARNG to determine if the applicant was qualified to be awarded Federal recognition.  The proceedings indicated that the applicant was satisfactory in his physical qualifications, moral character, and general qualifications.  

7.  On 4 February 2008, the applicant executed a second Oath of Office as a WO1 in the PRARNG and was granted temporary Federal recognition.

8.  On 14 March 2008, National Guard Bureau Federal Recognition Orders Number 70 AR, awarded the applicant permanent Federal recognition for initial appointment to the grade of WO1, effective 4 February 2008.

9.  An advisory opinion was obtained in the processing of this case on 6 May 2008.  The Chief of Personnel Division, National Guard Bureau, recommended approval of the applicant's request to adjust his initial appointment date from 4 February 2008 to 21 March 2006.  Furthermore, the chief recommended the applicant be promoted to CW2 effective 21 March 2008 and that he receives all back pay and allowances as a result of this adjustment. 

10.  A copy of the advisory opinion was furnished to the applicant on 6 May 2008. He concurred on 14 May 2008. 

11.  National Guard Regulation 600-101 (Warrant Officer - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) provides procedures for processing applications for Federal recognition.  Paragraph 2-1 states that warrant officers of the ARNG are appointed by the several States under Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution.  These appointments may be federally recognized by the Chief, NGB, under such regulations as the Secretary of the Army may prescribe and under the provisions of this regulation.  Warrant officers who are federally recognized in a particular grade and branch shall be tendered an appointment in the same grade as Reserve warrant officers of the Army with assignment to the Army National Guard of the United States, if they have not already accepted such appointment.

12.  National Guard Regulation 600-101, paragraph 2-3, states that temporary Federal recognition may be extended to an officer who has been appointed in the ARNG of a State and found to be qualified by a Federal recognition examining board pending final determination of eligibility and appointment as a warrant officer of the Army.  If not sooner withdrawn or replaced by the granting of permanent Federal recognition, temporary Federal recognition will automatically terminate 6 months after the effective date of State appointment.  However, should the initial period of temporary Federal recognition expire, due to administrative processing delays, through no fault of the member, a subsequent Federal recognition examining board should be convened to consider the request again and grant another new period of temporary Federal recognition, if warranted.  Paragraph 2-4b states that the effective date of Federal recognition is the date on which the officer executes the Oath of Office.

13.  National Guard Regulation 600-101, paragraph 9-15b, states that temporary Federal recognition may be granted by a Federal Recognition Board to those eligible when the board finds that the member has successfully passed the examination prescribed herein, has subscribed to the oath of office, and has been appointed by a State order for assignment to a position vacancy in a federally recognized unit of the ARNG.  The Federal Recognition Board will forward the NGB Form 89 and allied documents to The Adjutant General.  When the member is favorably recommended, The Adjutant General will endorse the packet to the NGB.  If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal recognition, the Chief, NGB, extends permanent Federal recognition to the member in the grade and branch in which the member is qualified.

14.  Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers, Other Than General Officers), paragraph 2-1, states, in pertinent part, that an officer in the grade of warrant officer one will be considered for promotion without review by a selection board.  The officer's records will be screened to determine eligibility for promotion to the next higher grade far enough in advance to permit promotion on the date the promotion service is completed in compliance with table 2-1 or table 2-3 of this regulation.

15.  Table 2-3 (Warrant Officer Time in Grade and Military Education Requirements) of Army Regulation 135-155 shows that the minimum time in grade as a warrant officer one for promotion to chief warrant officer two is
2 years.  Table 2-3 also shows, in pertinent part, that warrant officers must complete a warrant officer basic course to be eligible for promotion to chief warrant officer two.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant was granted temporary Federal Recognition effective 21 March 2006 upon his initial appointment in the PRARNG as a WO1.  At that time, his Federal recognition packet and allied documents should have been forwarded to the Adjutant General of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico for endorsement to the National Guard Bureau for extension of permanent Federal recognition.  Through no fault of the applicant, this action was not accomplished.

2.  Subsequently, the applicant's Federal recognition packet was considered by a second PRARNG Federal Recognition Board on 4 February 2008.  Based on the recommendations of the second PRARNG Federal Recognition Board, the National Guard Bureau issued orders awarding the applicant permanent Federal recognition effective 4 February 2008.

3.  From the foregoing, it is clear that an administrative error denied the applicant Federal recognition effective 21 March 2006.   Therefore, based on applicable law and regulation, the applicant is entitled to have Federal Recognition Order Number 70 AR amended to show the effective date of permanent Federal recognition in the grade of WO1 as 21 March 2006 and to receive back pay and allowances as a result of this correction.

4.  In view of the foregoing and based on the 21 March 2006 effective date for WO1, the applicant was eligible for promotion to CW2 on 21 March 2008.  He met the military educational requirement (i.e., completion of the Aviation Warrant Officer Basic Course) for promotion to CW2 prior to 21 March 2008.  Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show he was promoted to CW2 and awarded permanent Federal recognition for promotion to CW2, effective 21 March 2008.

BOARD VOTE:

__xxx___  __xxx___  __xxx___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  amending Federal Recognition Order Number 70 AR dated 14 March 2008 to show that he was extended Federal Recognition effective 21 March 2006 in the grade of WO1; 

	b.  issuing the applicant a new Federal Recognition Order that shows he was promoted to CW2 with an effective date of rank of 21 March 2008; and

	c.  restoration of back pay and allowances as a result of this correction.



							XXX
       _   _______   ___
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007050





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007050



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002588

    Original file (20080002588.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    National Guard Regulation 600-101 (Warrant Officer - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) provides procedures for processing applications for Federal recognition. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was granted temporary Federal Recognition effective 16 May 2006 upon his initial appointment in the VTARNG as a WO1. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending Federal Recognition...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000791

    Original file (20080000791.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the date of his initial appointment and date of rank to warrant officer one (WO1) from 31 July 2007 to 8 August 2006. National Guard Regulation 600-101 (Warrant Officer - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) provides procedures for processing applications for Federal recognition. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was granted temporary Federal recognition effective 8 August 2006 upon his initial appointment in the MTARNG as a WO1.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018199

    Original file (20080018199.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was granted temporary Federal recognition effective 7 March 2007 upon his completion of WOCS and execution of an oath of office. Subsequently, the applicant's Federal recognition packet was considered by a second GAARNG Federal Recognition Board on 13 December 2007 and the applicant executed a second oath of office on that date. Based on the recommendations of the second GAARNG Federal Recognition Board, the NGB issued orders awarding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015871

    Original file (20060015871.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his National Guard Federal recognition order (initial appointment) in the grade of warrant office one (WO1) be corrected to show an effective date of 9 April 2004, his promotion to the grade of chief warrant officer two (CW2) be corrected to show an effective date of 9 April 2006, and all pay and allowances due him based on these corrections. Based on the recommendations of the second VAARNG Federal Recognition Board, the National Guard Bureau issued...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016495

    Original file (20080016495.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board, dated 19 September 2007, shows the board found the applicant to be physically, morally, generally, and professionally qualified for the appointment and again recommended he be granted Federal Recognition. Records show that the applicant was granted temporary Federal Recognition effective 29 November 2006 upon his initial appointment in the GAARNG as WO1. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016499

    Original file (20080016499.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of both of his oaths of office to WO1, Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board, Federal Recognition orders, promotion orders, and seven additional pages from his military personnel record. There is no evidence of record that shows why a Federal Recognition Board was not convened until almost 2 years after the applicant was appointed. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013766

    Original file (20080013766.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence the applicant received permanent Federal Recognition for initial appointment as a WO1 from the National Guard Bureau within the six-month period required by National Guard/Army Regulations. However, should the initial period of temporary Federal Recognition expire due to administrative processing delays, through no fault of the member, a subsequent Federal Recognition Board should be convened to consider the request again and grant another new period of temporary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018493

    Original file (20080018493.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant further states that he filed an Inspector General complaint in theater, that the Puerto Rico Army National Guard was pressured by the National Guard Bureau to submit his Federal recognition and promotion package as soon as possible, and that due to the fact that they were not sent in a timely manner by the Officer Section his effective date for Federal recognition, warrant officer appointment, and promotion date is 15 November 2006. The recommendation to adjust the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006536

    Original file (20080006536.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his DOR to Warrant Officer One (WO1) was 18 February 2005, and that by regulation he should have been promoted to CW2 after 2 years of time in grade (TIG) as a WO1. National Guard Bureau Special Orders Number 82 AR, dated 15 March 2005, extended the applicant permanent Federal Recognition for initial appointment to the grade of warrant officer one, effective 18 February 2005. Paragraph 2-3a of National Guard Regulation 600-101 states that temporary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016386

    Original file (20080016386.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her initial appointment date to warrant officer one (WO1) be changed from 21 August 2008 to 1 May 2007 and that she be promoted to the rank of chief warrant officer two (CW2) on 1 May 2009. The applicant states, in effect, that she initially took her oath of office as a WO1 on 1 May 2007; however, her Temporary Federal Recognition expired before permanent Federal Recognition was obtained and she had to be re-appointed by a Federal Recognition Board on 21 August...