Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005778
Original file (20080005778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        02 December 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080005778 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that he was promoted from specialist (SPC)/E-4 to sergeant (SGT)/E-5. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was qualified for promotion to SGT/ E-5 because he had time in grade.  He also states that promotion from SPC/E-4 to SGT/E-5 is at 12 months time in grade, and that he had been a SPC/E-4 for 18 months.  He further states that he served in combat and was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. 

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) that was issued at the time of his discharge on 17 December 2005 which will simply be referred to as his DD Form 214 throughout the remainder of these proceedings, and a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 6 June 2006, which promoted him to SPC/E-4 effective 6 June 2004 in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's military records show that he served on active duty in the United States Naval Reserve from 3 October 1984 to 25 August 1987.  He was honorably released from active duty and was transferred to the Naval Reserve Personnel Center, New Orleans, Louisiana to complete his military service obligation, which ended on 2 August 1992.  On 31 October 2002, he again enlisted in the United States Naval Reserve for a period of 3 years.  However, on 21 May 2003, he enlisted in the New York Army National Guard for a period of 
3 years.  On 15 May 2004, he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.  He was promoted from private first class/E-3 to SPC/E-4 effective 6 June 2004.  He served in Iraq from 28 October 2004 to 30 July 2005, and he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.  On 17 December 2005, he was honorably discharged.  

2.  The applicant requested that his military records be corrected to show he was promoted from SPC/E-4 to SGT/E-5.  However, there is no evidence in the applicant's military records which show he was recommended for promotion to SGT, that he appeared before a promotion board, that promotion board proceedings were approved by the promotion authority, and that he was placed on a promotion standing list for promotion to SGT and met a promotion point cutoff score.

3.  The applicant stated that he was qualified for promotion to SGT/E-5 because he had the time in grade.  He also stated that promotion from SPC/E-4 to SGT/
E-5 is 12 months time in grade, and that he had been a SPC/E-4 for 18 months.  He further stated that he also served in combat, and was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

4.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  This regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show that he was promoted from SPC/E-4 to SGT/E-5.

2.  While the applicant contends that promotion from SPC/E-4 to SGT/E-5 is at 12 months time in grade, there is no provision for automatically promoting a Soldier from SPC/E-4 to SGT/E-5 at 12 months time in grade, or after attaining any amount of time in grade or service.  Additionally, the fact that the applicant served in combat is commendable; however, combat service does not convey entitlement to promotion.

3.  While the sincerity of the applicant's claim that he should have been promoted from SPC/E-4 to SGT/E-5 is not questioned, there is no evidence in the applicant's military records, and that applicant failed to provide any evidence which shows that he was recommended for promotion to SGT, that he appeared before a promotion board, that promotion board proceedings were approved by the promotion authority, and that he was placed on a promotion standing list for promotion to SGT and met a promotion point cutoff score.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for correcting his military records to show that he was promoted from SPC/E-4 to SGT/E-5.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  __X______  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during Operation Iraqi Freedom.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




      _______ _ XXX  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080005778



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080005778



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019751

    Original file (20120019751.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * a memorandum from her previous unit commander, recommending she receive 150 duty performance points for her battalion's June 2010 semi-centralized promotion board * the supporting documentation that substantiates her promotion board administrative points * a memorandum from the President of the Board, Headquarters, Special Troops Battalion, I Corps, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA, dated 2 June 2010, subject: Promotion Board Proceedings for Promotion to SGT and Staff...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017537

    Original file (20110017537.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was promoted to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 prior to placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). The applicant's record is void of any evidence and he did not provide any evidence which shows he appeared before a board for consideration of promotion to the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 at any time during his service following his reduction in rank or that he was in a promotable status at the time he was retired and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001621

    Original file (20140001621.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) as follows: * Item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist (SPC)/E-4 * Item 11 (Primary Specialty) to add the skill qualification identifier (SQI) of "V" (Ranger) and the additional skill identifier (ASI) of B4 (Sniper) * Item 12f (Foreign Service) to add an additional 14 months of foreign service for a total of 21 months of foreign...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012279

    Original file (20130012279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provided a memorandum from the 191st CSSB, dated 27 December 2012, subject: Promotion Board Proceedings for Promotion to SGT and SSG, recommending the applicant for promotion to SGT. HRC memorandum for U.S. Army Promotion Work Centers, dated 22 February 2013, subject: Department of the Army Promotion Point Cutoff Scores for 1 March 2013 and Junior Enlisted Issues, announcing promotion point cutoff scores for 1 March 2013. a. He provided a copy of his email to HRC, dated 3 June 2013,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016292

    Original file (20090016292.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Permanent orders show the applicant was awarded two Army Achievement Medals for service or achievement, which are not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these awards. The evidence of record shows he was issued permanent orders on 28 April 2009 promoting him to SGT/E-5 on 1 May 2009. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from items 4a, 4b,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009579

    Original file (20090009579.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 November 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090009579 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show that he was released from active duty (REFRAD) in the rank of sergeant (SGT) with a military occupational specialty (MOS) of 11B2O and that he was awarded the Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004456C070205

    Original file (20060004456C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Roland Venable | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank as sergeant (SGT), E-5 with a date of rank (DOR) of 9 January 2004. His DD Form 214 for the period ending 3 February 2005 does not show the Army Good Conduct Medal as an authorized award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010210

    Original file (20110010210.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, this form is not complete as it does not contain any points awarded by a promotion board and the form has not been verified or signed by the commander, board recorder, or promotion authority. With respect to the two awards of the Army Commendation Medal, the evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded two awards of the Army Commendation Medal and both are correctly shown on his DD Form 214. However, there is no evidence in his records and he did not provide any conclusive...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016992

    Original file (20130016992.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states at the time of his application he was in the medical evaluation board (MEB) process. The applicant provides: * U.S. Army Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), Fort Sam Houston, TX Memorandum for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), dated 17 April 2013 * Human Resources Command (HRC) Memorandum for U.S. Army, Promotion Work Centers, dated 18 April 2013, subject: Department of the Army Promotion Point Cutoff Scores for 1 May 2013 and Junior Enlisted Issues for the Active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029890

    Original file (20100029890.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 July 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100029890 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 18 November 2008, Headquarters, Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command, Fort Bragg, NC, published Orders 08-323-00010 ordering his honorable discharge from the USAR in the rank/grade of SPC/E-4 effective 19 November 2008. Regardless, there is no evidence in his records, and the applicant provides insufficient evidence, to show that he was promoted back to SGT...