Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005746
Original file (20080005746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080005746 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge.

2.  The applicant states he went absent without leave (AWOL) due to immaturity and a lack of education (3rd grade education).

3.  The applicant does not provide any additional documentation in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  The applicant’s records only contain his separation document (DD Form 214), General Court-Martial Order Number 463 dated 14 July 1955, and General Court-Martial Order Number 505 dated 8 August 1955.  It is presumed that the remainder of his records were destroyed in the fire at the records repository at St. Louis, Missouri, in 1973.  

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 August 1953.  He was 
20 years old at the time of his enlistment.

4.  On 27 June 1955, the applicant pled and was found guilty by a general court-martial of being AWOL from 9 December 1954 to 2 May 1955.  His sentence was a BCD, a forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 6 months (two previous convictions considered). 

5.  On 14 July 1955, the sentence was approved.

6.  On 8 August 1955, the findings and sentence of the general court-martial having been affirmed pursuant to Article 66, the sentence was executed.

7.  Accordingly, on 22 August 1955 the applicant was issued a BCD.  He had completed 4 months and 8 days of creditable service, and he had 600 days of lost time prior to the expiration of his term of service (ETS), and 11 days lost time subsequent to his ETS.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was 20 years old at the time of his enlistment.  As such, his contention that he was immature is not accepted.

2.  Because the applicant’s records could not be located, his level of education cannot be ascertained.  However, even if it could be determined that the applicant only had a 3rd grade education, it would not, in and of itself, be grounds to upgrade a properly issued discharge.  

3.  Also noted is the applicant’s lengthy period of AWOL was his third offense.  As such, the misconduct which formed the basis for his BCD was not an isolated incident or an aberration of his normal conduct.






BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X_____  ___X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080005746



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080005746



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013413

    Original file (20060013413.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 30 June 1954, the applicant, at a general court-martial (GCM) pled not guilty to the charge of desertion and guilty to the lesser included offense of AWOL for the period from 21 February to 8 June 1954. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was wounded in action against a hostile force on 1 December 1952; received medical treatment, and is "entitled" to the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021178

    Original file (20130021178.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 July 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130021178 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and his discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016236

    Original file (20080016236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant's two primary contentions are that he was young and immature when he enlisted, and that he continued to go AWOL because he was the object of unwanted sexual attention in the stockade. Also, while the applicant may have been 17...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072845C070403

    Original file (2002072845C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. There is nothing in the available records to support the applicant’s contention that he was eligible for a hardship discharge and was not provided assistance.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015241

    Original file (20080015241.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant’s available military personnel records contain a DD Form 214 that shows he entered active duty this period on 19 May 1950 and was discharged on 16 January 1958 under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208. The evidence of record shows that the applicant initially entered active duty on 19 May 1950, was honorably discharged for the purpose of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018212

    Original file (20080018212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general or an honorable discharge. On 23 April 1969, the United States Army Judiciary assumed prejudice in that the court assessed the sentence to meet the needs of local conditions rather than affording the applicant individualized consideration on punishment and only affirmed a BCD, a forfeiture of $75.00 a month for 12 months, and confinement for 1 year. There is no evidence of record and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003153

    Original file (20110003153.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 August 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110003153 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. However, the available evidence shows he was discharged on 10 January 1968 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unfitness due to an established pattern of shirking with an undesirable discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006506

    Original file (20120006506.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records are not available for review. On 7 December 1954, he was convicted by a general court-martial of being AWOL from 16 June to 28 October 1954 and he was sentenced to be discharged with a BCD. Accordingly, his sentence was not disproportionate to the offenses for which he was convicted and he has failed to show sufficient evidence or reasons to warrant an upgrade of his discharge based on clemency.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03596

    Original file (BC-2002-03596.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 23 June 1957, he was honorably discharged and on 24 June 1957, reenlisted in the RegAF for a period of four years. In an application, dated 13 August 1972, he requested his discharge be upgraded to one under honorable conditions. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that at the time of his discharge on 13 August 1959, he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013800

    Original file (20140013800 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests an upgrade of his dishonorable discharge (DD) to an honorable discharge (HD). The FSM's military records are not available for review. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.