Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005270
Original file (20080005270.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  22 JULY 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080005270 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his reentry (RE) code and separation code shown on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed.

2.  The applicant essentially states that he should be given an RE code of 1 due to his current medical condition.  He also states that he was given an RE code of 3 and feels this is an injustice and would like it upgraded so he might be able to get back into the military.  He further states that he feels that his condition was well enough to stay in the military if he had been given a chance to apply his medical and mental conditions as a productive Soldier.  Additionally, he states he was also asked if he wanted to stay or get out of the military, and that he changed his mind to get back in if at all possible. 

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); DA Form 4707 (Entrance Physical Standards Board [EPSBD] Proceedings); and orders, dated 20 October 2004, which discharged him on 
28 October 2004 in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of 
Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 
3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 
8 September 2004.  However, the applicant went before an EPSBD on 30 September 2004.  Although his complete service medical records are not available, the proceedings of the EPSB essentially show that the applicant was diagnosed with chronic low back pain and mild arthritis of the lumbar spine which existed prior to service and was not service-aggravated.  It should be noted that the applicant had the option of disagreeing with the EPSBD proceedings if he believed his condition did not exist prior to service and request that his case be returned to the medical approving authority for reconsideration.

3.  On 28 October 2004, the applicant was discharged accordingly.  The 
DD Form 214 that he was issued at the time of his discharge shows that he had completed only 1 month and 21 days of active Federal service.  Item 24 (Character of Service) of this document has an entry of “Uncharacterized,” and Item 25 (Separation Authority) of this document shows that the authority for his discharge was Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel), Paragraph 5-11.  Item 26 (Separation Code) of this document has an entry of "JFW," and item 27 (Reentry Code) has an entry of "3."  Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of this document has an entry of "Failure to Meet Procurement Medical Fitness Standards."  
 
4.  The applicant essentially stated that he should be given an RE code of 1 due to his current medical condition.  He also stated that he was given an RE code of 3 and feels this is an injustice and would like it upgraded so he might be able to get back into the military.  He further stated that he feels that his condition was well enough to stay in the military if he had been given a chance to apply his medical and mental conditions as a productive Soldier.  Additionally, he stated he was also asked if he wanted to stay or get out of the military, and that he changed his mind to get back in if at all possible. 

5.  Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, provided the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entrance on active duty or active duty training or initial entry training will be separated.  A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldier’s initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at that time, and the medical condition does not disqualify the Soldier from retention in the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501, chapter 3. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the Soldier is in an entry level status.  Entry level status is defined as the first 180 days of continuous active duty.

6.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the United States Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including Regular Army RE codes.  RE codes 1 and 2 permit immediate reenlistment if all other criteria are met.  An RE code of 3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable.  An RE code of 4 indicates separation from the last period of service with a disqualification which cannot be waived and ineligibility for reenlistment.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. Additionally, Table 2-3 (SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table), AR 635-5-1 (Separation Documents) establishes RE Codes to be assigned for each SPD.  

8.  An SPD code of "JFW" applies to persons discharged for failure to meet medical/physical procurement standards.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that an RE code of 3 is the applicable RE code assigned for individuals discharged for this reason.  The applicant’s RE code of 3 indicates that the he was separated from his last period of service with a disqualification which is waivable.

9.  Paragraph 4-5 of Army Regulation 601-210 provides, in pertinent part, that any applicant who was last separated or discharged from any Component of the U.S. Armed Forces for medical reasons with or without disability for enlistment into the Regular Army, United States Army Reserve, or Army National Guard will require a waiver.  This paragraph also provides the documents required for waiver consideration.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his RE code and separation code shown on his 
DD Form 214 should be changed.
2.  The applicant's desire to return to military service is commendable; however, in order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

3.  The applicant's RE and separation codes are based on his reason for discharge and cannot be changed unless the applicant's narrative reason for separation is changed.  His narrative reason for separation was based on his failure to meet medical procurement fitness standards, and there is no basis upon which to change this reason.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting relief to the applicant in this case.

4.  However, the applicant is advised that he may be eligible for enlistment into the Armed Forces with a waiver.  Recruiting personnel have the responsibility for initially determining whether an individual meets current enlistment criteria.  They are required to process a request for waiver under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 601-210.  Therefore, it is recommended that the applicant contact his local recruiter.  The applicant is cautioned though that Army enlistment standards depend upon the needs of the Army at the time of application for enlistment, and that there is no inherent right by a former service member to be enlisted in the Army.  The Army chooses its enlistees from among those best qualified to meet the Army's requirements.  Therefore, if he is not at first successful, it is suggested that he periodically visit his local recruiting station so as to keep abreast of the changing recruiting needs of the Army.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__XXX __  __XXX__  __XXX__   DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants to thank the applicant for his interest in reentering the Armed Forces, and wishes him the best in his efforts to do so.




      ___        XXX                ___
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080005270



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080005270



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020330

    Original file (20090020330.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 August 2007, the discharge authority approved the applicant's separation from the Army. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows the following: * in item 24 (Character of Service), uncharacterized * in item 25 (Separation Authority), Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-11 * in item 26 (Separation Code), JFW * in item 27 (Reentry Code), 3 * in item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation), failed medical/physical/ procurement standards 6. A...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002399

    Original file (20140002399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a: * 4 February 2010 letter from a doctor in the Boston Medical Center stating the applicant did not have any kidney stones that day * 28 December 2011 Boston University Urology Department letter stating the applicant was seen on 4 February 2010 and had no kidney stones * page 10 of enlistment documents showing his enlistment included an enlistment bonus, SLRP, and the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) * 5 January 2012 Clinical Record showing a medical waiver had been...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015302

    Original file (20090015302.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entrance on active duty or active duty training or initial entry training will be separated. The regulation states the reason for discharge based on separation code JFW is failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards and the regulatory authority is Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021548

    Original file (20130021548.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A medical proceeding conducted by an EPSBD, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldier's initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at the time of enlistment, and the medical condition does not disqualify the Soldier from retention in the service under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011424

    Original file (20130011424.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 4707 (Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) Proceedings), dated 18 December 1996, shows in item 8 (after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examination, the board found that he was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the condition existed prior to service. Accordingly, he was discharged from active duty on 31 January 1997, under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017233

    Original file (20110017233.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 September 2009, during a meeting with his company commander he was asked a series of questions and it was determined that he needed to be separated from the Army because of a history of depression as shown in his medical records. On 11 September 2009, the applicant's commander initiated an administrative separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations), paragraph 5-11, due to failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011855

    Original file (20140011855.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his reentry eligibility (RE) code on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) from RE-3 to a more favorable code so that he may reenter the military. On 2 May 2013, the medical approving authority approved the findings of the EPSBD and recommended that the applicant be separated from the service under the provisions of paragraph 5-11 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations-Active Duty Enlisted Administrative...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080018966

    Original file (AR20080018966.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The record contains a document, subject: Counseling Reference EPSBD Proceedings, in which the Applicant stated he had been counseled about his rights in connection with processing of an Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) and had been informed he did not meet procurement medical fitness standards at the time of his enlistment. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the Applicant’s record and his service did not warrant an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000639

    Original file (20150000639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entrance on active duty, active duty training, or initial entry training, will be separated. A medical proceeding conducted by an EPSBD, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within 6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005166

    Original file (20080005166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides his separation document (DD Form 214) and a partial Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) Proceedings packet in support of his application. The evidence of record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 that shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 5-11, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness...