Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005268
Original file (20080005268.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  22 May 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080005268 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her effective date of pay grade to sergeant (SGT)/E-5 from 1 June 1982 to 1 June 1987.

2.  The applicant states that she was promoted to SGT/E-5 on 1 June 1987 and that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) reflects the incorrect date.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214, dated 24 July 1992, and a copy of her promotion orders, in support of her application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show that she enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 1 September 1982.  She completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 71L (Administrative Specialist).  Her records also show she executed 
three 3-year reenlistments in the Regular Army on 5 April 1985, 11 February 1988, and 11 October 1990.

3.  Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows the applicant was promoted to private first class (PFC) on 1 July 1983, to specialist four (SP4) on 1 June 1984, and to SGT on 4 May 1987.

4.  Section II (Qualification data) of the applicant's DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record) shows the applicant's date of rank (DOR) to SGT as 2 May 1987.

5.  Headquarters, 573rd Personnel Service Company, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, Orders Number 97-14, dated 28 May 1987, show the applicant was promoted to SGT/E-5 with date of rank (DOR) of 2 May 1987 and an effective date of promotion as 1 June 1987.

6.  On 2 June 1992, the applicant requested separation from the Regular Army under the Voluntary Early Transition Program.  Accordingly, she was honorably discharged and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Individual Ready Reserve) on 24 July 1992.  

7.  Items 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) of the applicant's DD Form 214 reflect the entries SGT and E-5 respectively.  Item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) shows the entry "82 06 01." 

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The regulation directs, in pertinent part, that the purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of their military service.  It is important that information entered on the form should be complete and accurate.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty to include attendance at basic and advanced training.  It also states, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 will be prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty.  The active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of the Soldier's separation, were entered in Item 4 and the effective date of pay grade was entered in Item 12h. 


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant was promoted to SGT/E-5 with 2 May 1987 as her DOR and 1 June 1987 as her effective date of promotion. It is unclear why her effective date of promotion to E-5 shown on her DD Form 214 reflects 1 June 1982.  She could not have been promoted to E-5 on 1 June 1982 since she did not have prior service and did not enter the Regular Army until 1 September 1982.

2.  It appears that the incorrect entry on her DD Form 214 is the result of an administrative error that should be corrected.  Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of her records to show the effective date of promotion to SGT/E-5 as 1 June 1987.

BOARD VOTE:

__xxx___  __xxx___  __xxx___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the entry "82 06 01" from Item 12h of the applicant's DD Form 214, dated 24 July 1992 and replacing it with the entry "87 06 01."



							XXX
       _    _______   ___
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080005268



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080005268



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003910

    Original file (20090003910.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214 for the period ending 29 February 1984, a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), National Archives (NA) Form 13038 (Certificate of Military Service), DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), three DD Forms 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Contracts), two military pay vouchers, one Leave and Earnings Statement, and a letter from the Board directing a change to her date of rank. This DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008324

    Original file (20080008324.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his date of rank (DOR) to master sergeant (MSG)/E-8 as 1 October 1999 instead of 1 June 2000. The active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation is entered in Item 4 and the effective date of promotion to the current pay grade (from the most recent promotion or reduction order) is entered in Item 12h. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080008324 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009113

    Original file (20060009113.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be amended to show her correct rank in item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank). Headquarters, 81st Regional Support Command, Birmingham, Alabama Orders 03-132-00015, dated 12 May 2003, promoted the applicant from SGT to SSG with an effective date and date of rank (DOR) of 9 May 2003.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006785C070205

    Original file (20060006785C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that she was never in the U.S. Army Reserve and that her reserve obligation date in item 12i, of her DD Form 214, should be removed and that she was serving in pay grade E-3 prior to her release from active duty. The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 6 August 1982, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5, paragraph 5-31, EPD, in pay grade E-2, with transfer to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021501

    Original file (20140021501.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank as master sergeant (MSG), his pay grade as E-8, and his date of rank (DOR) as 11 March 1985. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 3961, provides the legal authority for the retired grade of Army personnel on the Retired List. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he retired from active duty in the grade of E-8 because he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029882

    Original file (20100029882.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His discharge orders show his pay grade as E-5. It further states that a grade determination is an administrative decision to determine appropriate retirement grade, retirement pay, or other separation pay and each case will be considered on its own merits. It states that each retired enlisted member of the Army who is retired with less than 30 years of active service is entitled, when his/her active service plus his/her service on the Retired List totals 30 years, to be advanced on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000353

    Original file (20140000353.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of items 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank), 4b (Pay Grade), and 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 9 September 1992. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010570

    Original file (20100010570.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), in pertinent part, shows in: a. item 5 (Oversea Service) that he served for 3 months in Korea from 24 July 1978 through 1 November 1978; b. item 6 (Military Occupational Specialties) that he was awarded primary MOS 12B1O on 12 May 1977; c. item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) that he was: * promoted to SP4/E-4 with a date of rank (DOR) of 5 October 1978 * promoted to SGT/E-5 with a DOR of 12 April 1980 * reduced to SP4/E-4 with a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015142

    Original file (20080015142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was promoted effective 21 June 1985. Therefore, notwithstanding the opinion provided by HRC-STL, the applicant's correct effective date of promotion to staff sergeant was 1 June 1985 and it is appropriate to correct item 12h of his DD Form 214 to read 1985 06 01 instead of 1985 06 21. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. changing his effective date of promotion to staff sergeant/pay grade E-6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008502

    Original file (20110008502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * his service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * his rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 * completion of military occupational specialty (MOS) 16S Stinger Crewman Transition Training Course * 6 months of training overseas 2. Chapter 2 of Army Regulation 635-5 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states: * items 4a and 4b show the active duty rank and...