Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004207
Original file (20080004207.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	IN THE CASE OF:	

	BOARD DATE:	  17 July 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080004207 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he was promoted to Chief Warrant Officer Three (CW3), W-3, in 2006 instead of in 2007.

2.  The applicant states that he called the U. S. Army Human Resources Command (St. Louis) (USAHRC – STL) in 2005 to get his promotion packet ready.  He was told he was not able to send in his packet until 2006.  In 2006, he asked to send in his packet.  Again, he was told he was not able to send in his packet.  In early 2007, he was notified he had two weeks to get his promotion packet together.  He was told he was being given so little time because he was activated at the time and must have fallen through the cracks.  He was promoted to CW3 on 13 June 2007 with a back date of 19 March 2007, but he is a year behind all of his classmates and peers.

3.  The applicant provides his DA Form 71 (Oath of Office – Military Personnel), dated 19 March 1999; his Chief Warrant Officer Two (CW2) promotion memorandum; and his CW3 promotion orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  After having had prior enlisted service, the applicant was appointed a Warrant Officer One in the U. S. Army Reserve on 19 March 1999.  He was promoted to CW2 on 19 March 2001.  He was promoted to CW3 effective 13 July 2007 with a date of rank of 19 March 2007.

2.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from Special Actions, Department of the Army (DA) Promotions, USAHRC – STL.  The advisory opinion stated that the date of rank for consideration by the 2006 CW3 DA Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB) was 31 December 2006 and earlier.  The applicant was erroneously omitted from the 2006 board and has a basis for a special board under the 2006 CW3 DA RCSB criteria.

3.  A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment or rebuttal.  He did not respond within the given time frame.

4.  Army Regulation 135-155 prescribes the policies and procedures for promotion of Reserve officers.  Paragraph 3-5 states that promotion advisory boards/special selection boards will be convened to reconsider officers who were either improperly omitted from consideration due to administrative error or who were non-selected from mandatory promotion as a result of material error.  Paragraph 3-19 states that promotion advisory boards are nonstatutory boards and are convened to reconsider all warrant officers, to include commissioned warrant officers.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Special Actions, USAHRC – STL, acknowledged that the applicant was erroneously omitted from promotion consideration by the 2006 CW3 DA RCSB.

2.  While it would not be equitable to arbitrarily correct the applicant’s CW3 date of rank to show he was selected for promotion by the 2006 RCSB, his records should be considered by a promotion advisory board/special selection board for promotion reconsideration under the 2006 CW3 DA RCSB criteria.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

__xx____  __xx____  ___xx___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

     a.   submitting his records to a duly constituted promotion advisory board/special selection board for promotion reconsideration under the 2006 CW3 DA RCSB criteria; and

     b.  if he is selected for promotion that his records be further corrected by promoting him to CW3 and assigning the appropriate effective date and date of rank; or

     c.  if he is not selected for promotion that he be notified accordingly.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to showing he was promoted to CW3 in 2006 without having to be reconsidered by a promotion advisory board/special selection board.




 _   ______xxxx______________
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080004207





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080004207



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007903

    Original file (20080007903.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states “My eligibility for promotion to CW4 was not considered by the April 18-23, 2008 promotion Board. The applicant should have been considered for promotion to CW4 by the 2008 promotion selection board. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by submitting his records to a duly constituted Special Selection Board for consideration for Reserve promotion to Chief Warrant Officer Four under the 2008...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003854

    Original file (20080003854.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    By letter dated 26 August 2003, the applicant was notified by the U.S. Army Total Army Personnel Command – St. Louis that he was not selected a second time for promotion. It stated, "A review of the applicant's records revealed that he was considered, but non-selected by the 2002 and 2003 Chief Warrant Officer Four Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board as a member of the Individual Ready Reserve. Evidence shows that he was well aware of the 2002 and 2003 DA RCSBs and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015787

    Original file (20070015787.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 1 August 2006, HRC-Alexandria, Virginia, published Orders A-09-409086A01, amending Orders A-09-409086, dated 7 September 2004, to read the additional instruction “effective 28 October 2004, all Reserve Component warrant officers ordered to active duty for operational support will remain in the Reserve component promotion system.” 5. In an advisory opinion obtained in the processing of this case on 27 December 2007, the Chief, Special Actions Branch, Reserve Promotions, HRC-St Louis,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021224

    Original file (20090021224.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. retroactive promotion to chief warrant officer four (CW4) on 6 November 2007; b. amendment of active duty orders for the period 6 November 2007 to 11 March 2008 to recover retroactive pay and allowances; and c. correction of item 12c (Net Active Service This Period), item 12d (Total Prior Active Service), and item 12e (Total Prior Inactive Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period ending dated 11 March 2008,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017287

    Original file (20070017287.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 April 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070017287 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, promotion reconsideration for chief warrant officer three (CW3) by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2007 year criteria. The applicant was considered and not selected for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006142

    Original file (20070006142.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that while on active duty he was selected for promotion by the Active Duty List (ADL) CW3 promotion board with a promotion date of 1 March 2006. He was not promoted to CW3 because he did not have 2 years of active duty remaining to complete the required ADSO. He was then selected for promotion to CW3 by the first Reserve Component CW3 promotion board for which he was eligible for consideration after he came off active duty in September 2006.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006142

    Original file (20070006142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Powers Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states that while on active duty he was selected for promotion by the Active Duty List (ADL) CW3 promotion board with a promotion date of 1 March 2006. He was not promoted to CW3 because he did not have 2 years of active duty remaining to complete the required ADSO.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019264

    Original file (20080019264.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that she be reconsidered for promotion to Chief Warrant Officer Five (CW5) by a Special Selection Board (SSB). Therefore, it would be appropriate to have the applicant's record placed before an SSB for consideration for promotion under the criteria of the FY2008 CW5 RCSB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. submitting her records to a duly constituted SSB for promotion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012083

    Original file (20090012083.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of the following documents: * Two U.S. Army Aviation Center, Fort Rucker, AL course completion certificates dated in October/December 2005 * a U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO (USAHRC-STL) memorandum, subject: Notification of Promotion Status, dated 30 June 2006, notifying him of his non-selection for promotion to MAJ * his memorandum request for an SSB, dated 15 August 2006 * Headquarters Military Department, State of Washington, Camp Murray,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018138

    Original file (20080018138.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the DA Form 1059-2 (Senior Service College Academic Evaluation Report (AER)) for the period of 1 July 2001 through 16 December 2003 [herein referred to as the contested AER] and all related documents be removed from his official military personnel file (OMPF). The applicant also requests that any documents referring to his non-selection for promotion to colonel, O-6, be removed from his OMPF and that he be referred to a special promotion board in accordance with...