IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 22 July 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080003854
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his non-selection by two Department of the Army Mandatory Promotion Boards be annulled or a waiver be granted so that he may be removed from forced retirement and be allowed to return to his unit in the Army National Guard (ARNG).
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he was unjustly forced into retirement and passed over for promotion to CW4 while temporarily in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Individual Ready Reserve (IRR). He was not notified of errors and omissions in his personnel file, nor was he given the opportunity to correct them until after the promotion board had non-selected him. The applicant states that the reason for his non-selection was lack of required military education.
3. The applicant states he had completed the Senior Warrant Officer Course which was the requirement for promotion at that time. He continues that there is confusion as to whether or not he should have ever been before the promotion board at that time. He states he was previously promoted to CW4 while a member of the ARNG.
4. The applicant provides a Certificate of Completion for Reserve Component Aviation Senior Warrant Officer Training, dated 17 January 1996; a DA Form
67-8 (U.S. Army Officer Evaluation Report (OER)) with the period ending 9 April 1998; a memorandum from the Nevada Army National Guard (NVARNG)
Recruiting and Retention Command, dated 30 January 2008; a Letter of Recommendation from the NVARNG, dated 31 January 2008; and an Armed Forces of the United States Identification Card, with the expiration date of
13 March 2006.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant had prior service in the U.S. Naval Reserve (USNR) and the ARNG. On 25 November 1980, he was appointed as a Second Lieutenant (2LT)/O-1 in the California Army National Guard (CAARNG). On 29 December 1986, he was promoted to Captain (CPT)/O-3.
3. CAARNG Orders 126-23, dated 20 June 1980, show that the applicant was honorably separated from the CAARNG on 26 April 1989 at the rank of CPT.
4. National Guard Bureau (NGB) Special Orders Number 156 AR, dated
15 August 1989, show that the applicant's Federal Recognition was withdrawn for the purpose of reappointment as a Chief Warrant Officer Two (CW2)/W-2 in the CAARNG effective 26 April 1989. On 27 March 1996, the applicant was promoted to CW3.
5. CAARNG Orders 77-168, dated 17 March 2000, show that the applicant was honorably separated from the CAARNG on 14 March 1999 and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) in the rank of CW3. There are no promotion orders in the applicant's records that show he was promoted to the rank of CW4 prior to his transfer to the USAR.
6. The U.S. Army Human Recourses Command-St. Louis (USAHRC-STL) Soldier Management System (SMS), Transaction History, indicates in entries dated 21 February 2001 and 17 April 2001 that the applicant updated his address, phone number and/or email.
7. ARPC Form 3725-E (Army Reserve Status and Address Verification) dated
20 August 2001, shows the applicant's current home address. The document further indicates that he changed his email address. He further indicated interest in assignment to an individual mobilization augmentee (IMA) position and training as an individual ready reservist. The document is verified by his signature on the same date.
8. The applicant's records were considered by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 Department of the Army Reserve Component Selection Board (DA RCSB) for promotion to the grade of CW4.
9. By letter dated 6 August 2002, the applicant was notified by the U.S. Army Total Army Personnel Command - St. Louis that he was not recommended for promotion.
10. The applicant's records were considered by the FY 2003 DA RCSB for promotion to the grade of CW4.
11. By letter dated 26 August 2003, the applicant was notified by the U.S. Army Total Army Personnel Command St. Louis that he was not selected a second time for promotion. The memorandum further stated, "As a result of this second nonselection, you must be discharged in accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code 14513 or Army Regulation 140-10, your established removal date is not later than 10 November 2003, unless you are eligible for and request transfer to the Retired Reserve." This letter did not state the reason for the applicant's second nonselection.
12. On 10 November 2003, the applicant was released from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) and was assigned to the Retired Reserve by reason of "NON-SELECTION FOR PROMOTION."
13. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Special Actions Branch, USAHRC-STL. The advisory opinion recommended denial. It stated, "A review of the applicant's records revealed that he was considered, but non-selected by the 2002 and 2003 Chief Warrant Officer Four Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board as a member of the Individual Ready Reserve. The reason for the non-selection is unknown because board deliberations are not a matter of record. However, in his case, his Certificate for Senior Warrant Officer Training and his officer
evaluation report ending April 9, 1998 were seen by both selection boards. Zone
of consideration messages are electronically transmitted world wide announcing
selection boards; applicant was mailed notification memos and given the opportunity to provide documentation to the selection board."
14. In his rebuttal to the advisory opinion, the applicant stated in part that he was a career guardsman with a long history, actively volunteering for extra duties as well as missions in support of his unit, flight facility, state, and nation. His spouse was diagnosed with an aggressive form of breast cancer. With support from his guard unit, he was to temporarily transfer to the IRR so that he would not have to worry about drill or annual training and would return to his unit when his spouse's health improved. He did not expect to be placed before a promotion board. It was not until his spouse's recovery and his attempt to return to the ARNG did he find out what happened.
15. The applicant further states that the advisory opinion stated that the promotion board zone of consideration messages are transmitted electronically worldwide announcing selection boards and memos were mailed to him. At that time he did not have an active account, so he could not have received any messages sent in that manner. Though it is certainly not the Army's fault, at that time he had moved to be closer to the hospital where his spouse was undergoing her care. Notifying the IRR of his move and change of address was not a priority during this time. Finally, promotion board deliberations are not a matter of record so it is unknown what the board based its decision on, though they did have one OER and one school diploma. However, the board did not have available to review the various positions he held in his unit, his civilian employment as an instructor pilot for the Sacramento Metro Fire Department, and that each year he coordinated and conducted training for the National Guard pilots in wild land fire fighting. He was the National Guard pilot that teamed with the U.S. Forest Service to develop the techniques and procedures to integrate UH-60 Blackhawks into a fire fighting role. He was presented the Medal of Valor by the Governor, and he was responsible for various other projects that have saved many lives during earthquakes, floods, or fires for the last 20 years.
16. On 7 July 2008, the Special Actions Branch, USAHRC-STL informed a Board analyst that in 2002 the applicant submitted a certificate to the FY 2002 DA RCSB, and for the FY 2003 DA RCSB he submitted a letter to the president of the board.
17. Army Regulation 135-155 governs the promotion of Reserve officers. Paragraph 2-7 specifies to be eligible for selection, an USAR officer who meets the eligibility requirements must be properly in an active status and participating satisfactorily in Reserve training. For promotion purposes, an officer is deemed
to be a satisfactory participant and in full compliance with the commanders instructions if, within the 12 months before the convene date of the board. USAR warrant officers in grades CW2 and CW3 who twice fail to be selected for
mandatory promotion to CW3 or CW4 will not again be considered for promotion. Twice non-selected warrant officers will be transferred to the Retired Reserve or discharged.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends that his non-selection by two Department of the Army Mandatory Promotion Boards to the grade of CW4 should be annulled or a waiver be granted so that he may be removed from forced retirement and be allowed to return to his unit in the ARNG.
2. On 14 March 1999, the applicant was honorably separated from the CAARNG and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) in the rank of CW3. He was twice non-selected by the DA RCSB for promotion to the grade of CW4. By regulation, as long as the applicant was in an active status (and his service in the IRR was an active Reserve status) his records would be considered by a mandatory promotion board. Based on his two non-selections to CW4 and based on the regulatory guidance, he was required to be discharged from the USAR after his second non-selection. He was discharged for that reason on
10 November 2003.
3. The applicant further contends that he was not notified of errors and omissions in his personnel file, nor was he given the opportunity to correct them until after the promotion board had non-selected him. However, evidence of record shows that his Certificate for Senior Warrant Officer Training and his officer evaluation report ending April 9, 1998 were seen by both selection boards. He was mailed notification memos and given the opportunity to submit documents to the selection board. Evidence shows that he was well aware of the 2002 and 2003 DA RCSBs and had ample time to review his records for promotion consideration, even providing documents to the respective promotion boards.
4. The applicants discharge for being twice non-selected for promotion was proper and equitable and there is no basis to grant the relief requested.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___xx __ ___xx _ ___xx __ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
___xxxxx _
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080003854
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080003854
6
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007903
The applicant states My eligibility for promotion to CW4 was not considered by the April 18-23, 2008 promotion Board. The applicant should have been considered for promotion to CW4 by the 2008 promotion selection board. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by submitting his records to a duly constituted Special Selection Board for consideration for Reserve promotion to Chief Warrant Officer Four under the 2008...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019264
The applicant requests, in effect, that she be reconsidered for promotion to Chief Warrant Officer Five (CW5) by a Special Selection Board (SSB). Therefore, it would be appropriate to have the applicant's record placed before an SSB for consideration for promotion under the criteria of the FY2008 CW5 RCSB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. submitting her records to a duly constituted SSB for promotion...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021224
The applicant requests: a. retroactive promotion to chief warrant officer four (CW4) on 6 November 2007; b. amendment of active duty orders for the period 6 November 2007 to 11 March 2008 to recover retroactive pay and allowances; and c. correction of item 12c (Net Active Service This Period), item 12d (Total Prior Active Service), and item 12e (Total Prior Inactive Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period ending dated 11 March 2008,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012463C071029
James R. Hastie | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He states that he was released from active duty and transferred to the IRR on 31 May 2006, and he was promoted effective that date and was assigned a date of rank of 15 January 2006. He states that based on six years time in grade, the applicant's PED was 15 January 2006, and he was assigned this date as his date of rank with a 31 May 2006 effective date,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009527C070208
The Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Army Human Resource Command (AHRC) – St. Louis reviewed the applicant’s record and determined he was erroneously not considered for promotion to CW4 by the 2001 and 2002 RCSBs, and that he was eligible for consideration for promotion to CW4 by a Special Selection Board (SSB) under the 2001 and 2002 CW4 RCSB selection criteria. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. If selected for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021458
She was then transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) but was not promoted to 1LT until 30 May 1997, nearly 3 years after her appointment. If she can provide documentation to verify she met all promotion requirements on 1 October 1996, her DOR to 1LT should be changed to 1 October 1996. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General Officers) provides policy for selecting and promoting commissioned officers of both the ARNG and the USAR.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051136C070420
The applicant was considered by the next available Reserve CW3 Promotion Board, the FY94 promotion board, but was not selected for promotion. The effective date for the applicant’s promotion to CW3 from the FY95 board His present promotion memorandum to CW4, dated 1 August 2000, should be corrected to be dated 19 May 2000, the adjournment date of the promotion board and therefore the effective date for promotion to CW4 and the date from which CW4 pay and allowances should be paid.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002542C070205
The applicant provides promotion memorandums dated 28 February 2005 and 17 March 2005; a void promotion memorandum dated 28 February 2005; State promotion orders dated 31 May 2005; a National Guard Bureau (NGB) memorandum dated 1 September 2004; an 8 September 2005 letter from the Office of the Inspector General, NGB; active duty orders dated 9 June 2004; deployment orders dated 4 August 2004; and a DD Form 2808 (Report of Medical Examination), examination completed on 10 August 2003. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011303
The applicant requests correction of his date of rank to captain in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). This memorandum states the applicant's promotion record reviewed by the promotion board did not show he had completed the required civilian or military educational requirements for favorable consideration. The advisory official stated the applicant had the basis for application to the DA Special Selection Board (SSB) because he had produced documentary evidence showing he had completed his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009433C070208
By memorandum dated 24 September 2002, and apparently received by him on or about 10 October 2002, the applicant was notified that, even though he had not been recommended for promotion, a Selective Continuation board recommended him for continuation in his present grade. Army Regulation 135-175 (Separation of Officers) states that a commissioned officer vacates his Army Reserve appointment when he accepts a Regular Army appointment in a commissioned grade; accepts a promotion to a higher...