Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003374
Original file (20080003374.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  
	   

	BOARD DATE:	  3 June 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080003374 

THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show his name as G____ C_______ M_______.

2.  The applicant states that his naturalization and name change took place before he left the military.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge); a letter, dated 5 March 2007, from the National Personnel Records Center; a letter, dated 8 January 2008, from the United States District Court, Office of the Clerk, Western District of Texas; and a certificate indicating his name change.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board.  This case is being considered using the documents provided by the applicant.  

3.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 April 1962.  He completed infantry training and was awarded specialty number 111.1668 (light weapons infantryman).  

4.  The applicant was released from active duty on 26 April 1965.  He authenticated his DD Form 214 indicating his name as B____ G_____ 
Y S______.  Item 1 (Name (Last, first, middle)) on his DD Form 214 shows 
his first name and last name as B____ G_____ Y S______.  

5.  The applicant provided a letter from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division.  This letter indicates he became a naturalized U.S. citizen on 23 April 1965 and his name was officially changed from his given name B____ G_____ Y S______ to G____ C_______ M_______.

6.  Army Regulation 600-2 (Name and Birth Data, Social Security Account Number, and Temporary Identification Number) prescribed the procedures for the recording of names and the changing of record of name and/or birth data.  Paragraph 2-3 stated that the request for change of the record must originate with the individual.  The authority to approve the change of record was delegated to the immediate commanding officer or other official so designated by him.  

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part it states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should actually reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, this Board is reluctant to recommend that those records be changed.

2.  The applicant’s court document shows his name was changed from his given name of B____ G_____ Y S______ to G____ C_______ M_______ on 23 April 1965, three days prior to his separation date.  
3.  Although the applicant appears to be currently using the name G____ C_______ M_______, it appears he served on active duty under the name B____ G_____ Y S______.  While the Board understands the applicant's desire to have the records changed, it finds no basis for compromising the integrity of the Army's records.  This Board action will be filed in his military records so a record of the name he is currently using will be on hand.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

xx______  xx______  xx______  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      xxxxxx_________________
      	CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080003374



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080003374



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006851

    Original file (20070006851.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he changed his name on 22 January 2007 and his records should be updated to reflect the change. He was advised that a change of name to his official records is made only after an administrative examination of the evidence and approval by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The evidence shows that the applicant changed his full legal name from "B____ C________ L____" to T____ A____ G____" on 22 January 2007, after his separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017908

    Original file (20080017908.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is no evidence of record or independent evidence that suggests the name recorded in his military records exhibits a material error or injustice. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted, served, and was discharged from active duty under the name J____ L___ B____. __________x______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004008

    Original file (20150004008 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his name as Oscar (no middle initial (NMI)) G____. The applicant's birth certificate shows his name as Oscar G____ R____. The form shows the applicant's mother's maiden name as his "English" surname with his father's surname being used as a middle name, R____, Oscar G____.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000503

    Original file (20080000503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. There are no orders in the applicant’s military service records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. The evidence of record also shows, in pertinent part, that injuries or wounds sustained as a result of accidents do not qualify for award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011260

    Original file (20130011260.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his name as W____ G____ Z____. The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214; Honorable Discharge Certificate; and District Court of El Paso County, Texas, Order Granting Change of Name Adult. The applicant used the name W____ W____ I____ throughout his military service and this name is properly recorded on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001275

    Original file (20090001275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his first name and middle name as B____ G____. Although the applicant appears to be currently using the first name and middle name of B____ G____, he served in the military and he was released from the military under the first name and middle name, G___ T___. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021275

    Original file (20120021275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her last name as "G____" vice "B____" and to add award of the Army Commendation Medal. There is no evidence in the available records that shows she was awarded the Army Commendation Medal. In the absence of orders, there is insufficient evidence to correct her DD Form 214 to show award of the Army Commendation Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006073

    Original file (20140006073.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He stated the Army Decorations Board reviewed the applicant's Distinguished Service Cross award documents in 2001, along with the new materials that were provided, and determined the degree of action and service rendered did not meet the extraordinary heroism required for the proposed award of the Medal of Honor. On or about 18 March 2014, the applicant learned that the President of the United States awarded 24 Army veterans the Medal of Honor based on section 522 of the FY02 NDAA that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088371C070403

    Original file (2003088371C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 600-8-22, section I provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. It is appropriate to award the applicant the Good Conduct Medal for his period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014073

    Original file (20140014073.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of: * Aptitude Information Sheet, dated 2 December 1993, showing an address in Houston, Texas * DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States), pages 2 and 3, dated 22 January 1994 * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States), page 1, dated 22 January 1994 * DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement), Staff Sergeant (SSG) G____ C____ * orders assigning her to Fort Riley, Kansas, dated 6 October 1993 *...