Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006851
Original file (20070006851.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  
		  

	BOARD DATE:	  4 October 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070006851 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Ms. Joyce A. Wright

Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. Susan A. Powers

Chairperson

Mr. Edward E. Montgomery

Member

Mr. Qawiy A. Sabree

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his name be changed to reflect the name change that was approved in the District Court of Clark Country, Nevada, on 22 January 2007.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he changed his name on 22 January 2007 and his records should be updated to reflect the change. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of an Order for Change of Name, dated 22 January 2007, from the District Court of Clark Country, Nevada, a letter from the DFAS (Defense Finance and Accounting Service), and a copy of his active duty and retired identification (ID) card, in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 February 1998.  He was trained as an infantryman, in military occupational specialty (MOS), 11B.  He was promoted to staff sergeant effective 1 March 2003. 

2.   The applicant was separated by reason of temporary physical disability reasons on 29 November 2006.  He was placed on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL) effective 30 November 2006, in the rank of SSG.  

3.  The military documents that are on file in the applicant’s OMPF (Official Military Personnel File) show he served and was separated from active duty under the name of B______ C_______ L____ instead of the name T_____ A______ G____.

4.  The applicant provided a copy of an Order for Change of Name, from the District Court of Clark County, Nevada, filed on 23 January 2007, which shows that his name was change from B ____ C______ L____ to T____ A____ G_____, effective 22 January 2007.  

5. The applicant provided a copy of a letter from DFAS, dated 12 July 2007, which made reference to his retired pay account, of which all or a portion had been waived in order to receive compensation from the Veterans Administration (VA).  DFAS advised him that there appeared to be a discrepancy in his name between their records and the VA's records.  His records showed his full name as "B____ C________ L____" and VA records reflected his full name as "T____ A____ G____." 

6.  DFAS stated that the continuation of this name discrepancy could result in untimely delays in the processing of future adjustments in his account.  DFAS advised the applicant as to which of the names was currently his correct legal name, why his name was changed, if it is different than their records, and which name he wishes to utilize in his official records.  If the name change was the result of marriage, divorce or a legal court hearing, he could if he so desired, request a correction of name to his official records.  He was advised that a change of name to his official records is made only after an administrative examination of the evidence and approval by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR).  Your change of name would be effective from the date it was approved by the ABCMR.

7.  The applicant provided a copy his active duty and retired ID card. His active duty ID Card lists his name "B___ C_________ L___" and his retired ID Card, which was issued on 16 July 2007, lists his name as "T___ A___ G ___" 

8.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  The data contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 February 1998 under the name of B_____ C________ L_____, as opposed to T____ A___ G_____.  In reviewing the record, the applicant appropriately served on, and was separated from active duty, on 29 November 2006, and was placed on the TDRL, under the name he provided upon his entry onto active duty.  There is no evidence that he attempted to change his full legal name while he was in service.  

2.  The evidence shows that the applicant changed his full legal name from "B____ C________ L____" to T____ A____ G____" on 22 January 2007, after his separation from active duty and placement on the TDRL.  

3.  There is no evidence, and the applicant has provided none, which would indicate that an injustice will occur if his full legal name is not changed as requested by him.

4.  It is noted that the DFAS made reference to the discrepancy in the applicant's pay account and he was informed to take appropriate action and to apply to the ABCMR for relief.  

5.  While the Board understands the applicant’s desire to have the records changed, it finds no basis for compromising the integrity of the Army’s records.

6.  The Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records for historical purposes.  The data contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, the Board is reluctant to recommend that those records be changed.

7.  This Board action will be filed in his military records, so a record of the name annotated on the Order for Change of Name from the state of Nevada will be on hand.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_SAP____  __EM___  __QS___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




_____Susan A. Powers___
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20070006851
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20071004
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE
20061130  TTDRL
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR 635-40///TDRL
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
100
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003374

    Original file (20080003374.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 June 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080003374 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board. xxxxxx_________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004596

    Original file (20150004596.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. A memorandum authored by COL C____ T___ to MG D____ B. A____, subject: Request for GOMOR, dated 11 July 2011, that shows he requested a GOMOR be issued to the applicant based on an incident on 26 June 2011, in which the applicant was involved in a verbal argument with his (the applicant's spouse) that turned physical when he grabbed her by the neck to prevent her from walking away from him. (1) It shows the rating chain as: * Rater: CW2...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011529

    Original file (20110011529.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an expedited correction of his records as follows: a. to show he was promoted to colonel (COL) by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 Judge Advocate General's Corps (JAGC) Promotion Selection Board (PSB) with an appropriate date of rank with entitlement to back pay and allowances; b. to remove the rater's narrative comments from his 2003 officer evaluation report (OER) and provide appropriate instructions to any PSB (including any appropriate special selection boards (SSBs); c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006426

    Original file (20140006426.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Did the applicant sexually harass any Soldier during the 4 September 2012 and 11 October 2012 incidents in question? The applicant did not sexually harass any Soldier during the 4 September 2012 and 11 October 2012 incidents in question. On 15 November 2012, MG S____ W. S____, Commanding General, 335th Signal Command (Theater) (Provisional), requested delegation of authority to dispose of the applicant's misconduct case wherein he stated an Army Regulation 15-6 investigation of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004851

    Original file (20150004851.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and a court order. His records are void of documentation showing he served in the Army under any name other than the name listed on his DD Form 214. The applicant's military service records show he enlisted, served, and was discharged under the name that is listed on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150008950

    Original file (20150008950.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states the rater, Master Sergeant (MSG) G____ W. R____, for the contested NCOER was not his rater for the entire rating period. e. Part V (Overall Performance and Potential): (1) the rater marked "Marginal" with the bullet comments: * do not promote to SFC * do not send to SLC (Senior Leader Course) until Soldier demonstrates the ability to consistently exercise the Army's Values * send to challenging leadership schools immediately * performed Soldier tasks well in combat in a supporting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006888

    Original file (20130006888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. Counsel requests: * rescission of the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID) Report of Investigation (ROI), dated 28 February 2008 (Final/SSI – 0087-07-CID041-XXXXX-XX) * rescission of the memorandum of reprimand (MOR) issued to the applicant, dated 23 January 2012, and removal of the MOR from his Official Military Personnel File (now known as the Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR)) * remission of the alleged debt to the Defense...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012798

    Original file (20140012798.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It also shows the applicant was to be discharged from the service with an honorable characterization of service; the authority for separation was the message, dated 13 March 2014, subject: Officer Elimination Case, and AR 600-8-24, paragraph 4-2b, for misconduct and moral or professional dereliction of duty; and the SPD Code to be issued was "JNC." This review reveals, in pertinent part, the following individuals testified: * Lieutenant Colonel S____ D. B____, Commander, 369th Signal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084141C070212

    Original file (2003084141C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015292

    Original file (20090015292.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20080011103 on 4 September 2008.