Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003167
Original file (20080003167.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  8 May 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080003167 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with the period ending 11 November 1979 to show award of the Army Commendation Medal.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the above award was omitted from his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214; Headquarters, Fort Devens Permanent Orders 167-2, dated 24 October 1979; two Letters of Commendation; and a Certificate of Achievement, dated 6 December 1976.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 



has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 November 1976 and successfully completed basic training and advanced individual training.  He was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 82B (Construction Surveyor).  

3.  Headquarters, Fort Devens Permanent Orders 167-2, dated 24 October 1979, show that the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service for the period 24 January 1977 to 11 November 1979.

4.  On 11 November 1979, the applicant was honorably released from active duty in the rank of Sergeant (SGT)/E-5 after completing 3 years of creditable active service with no time lost.

5.  There is no evidence the applicant received the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award).  There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award).  His records do not contain any adverse information.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal.  His DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

2.  The applicant was separated in the rank of SGT/E-5t with 3 years of creditable active service with no time lost.  Therefore, it appears the applicant met the eligibility criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 12 November 1976 through 11 November 1979 based on completion of a period of qualifying service.



BOARD VOTE:

___XX__  __XX  ___  __XX___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected:

	a.  by awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal 
(1st Award) for the period 12 November 1976 through 11 November 1979; and

	b.  by amending his DD Form 214 to add the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and the Army Commendation Medal.




      _      XX          ___
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080003167



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080003167


2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001082

    Original file (20120001082.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 2 (Personnel Qualification Record), dated 15 January 1979, also lists his rank title as SP5 in item 9 (Grade). As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the AGCM for his qualifying honorable active service from 22 August 1975 through 21 August 1978, and add this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024237

    Original file (20100024237.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show: * The National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, and Army Commendation Medal * His rank/grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist five (SP5)/E-5 2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for the following awards: a. There is no evidence in his records and he did not provide any evidence that shows he served in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004938

    Original file (20150004938.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded for qualifying service in Vietnam. He was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from his DD Form 214, ending on 30 July 1976 the Good Conduct Medal and Vietnam Service Medal * adding to his DD Form 214, ending on 30 July 1976 the: * Army Commendation Medal * Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009573

    Original file (20120009573.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, two award orders, and a certificate of recognition in support of his request. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning military awards and decorations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001686

    Original file (20150001686.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20130006340 on 26 November 2013. He provides the following documents: a. DD Form 1610, dated 13 June 1978, ordering him to go TDY from Fort Devens, MA to Hawaii and Enewetak Atoll on or about...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020810

    Original file (20140020810.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he would like item 26 of his DD Form 214 to list the Army Good Conduct Medal and any awards for the Torrijos-Carter conflict. There is no evidence of record and he provided insufficient evidence to show he was deployed to Panama.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015685

    Original file (20090015685.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the entry "Civilian Education: HS GED" from item 30 of his DD Form 214 and adding the entry "Civilian...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003073

    Original file (20110003073.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This pamphlet shows the 5th Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment, the unit to which the applicant was assigned, was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period April 1968 through 31 August 1970 by Department of the Army General Orders Number 51, dated 1971. c. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021858

    Original file (20100021858.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant's military records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. Therefore, based on the above evidence his DD Form 214 should be amended to add the Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 25 May 1967 through 15 May 1969; and b. amending item 26 (Decorations, Medals,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008772

    Original file (20120008772.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show two awards of the Army Commendation Medal and a second award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. In the absence of any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award him a second award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a qualifying period of active Army service and correcting his DD Form 214 to show this award....