Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002787
Original file (20080002787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  22 MAY 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080002787 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form  
214) be corrected to show his characterization of service as honorable for the period ending 9 July 1992.

2.  The applicant states that proper procedures and proper counseling were not followed in regards to his separation from the Active Reserve.  He is qualified to be transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) due to financial hardship.  He continued to earn promotions and citations.  His awards, length of service, completion of initial entry training (IET), and military occupational specialty (MOS) awards qualify him for an honorable discharge.  He further states that he asked the unit administrator to place him into the IRR several times because of his financial crisis, but he was offered no alternatives.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, DD Form 293 (Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States), Headquarters, 120th Army Reserve Command, Orders Number  
081-020 dated 16 November 1994, and a Certificate of Award for the Army Achievement Medal.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military personnel record shows he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 22 February 1992.  He completed the necessary training and was awarded the MOS 31K (Combat Signaler).  

3.  He was released from active duty training with a characterization of service of uncharacterized and was transferred to Headquarters and Headquarters Battery (HHB), 17th field Artillery, 3115 Western Boulevard (Blvd), Raleigh, North Carolina on 9 July 1992.  He had completed 4 months and 18 days of Net Active Service This Period.

4.  Headquarters, 120th Army Reserve Command, Orders Number  
081-020 dated 16 November 1994 shows that the applicant was released from HHB, 17th field Artillery, 3115 Western Blvd, Raleigh, North Carolina for unsatisfactory participation, and transferred to the U.S. Army (USAR) Control Group RNF (Reinforcement), St. Louis, Missouri, effective 16 November 1994.

5.  USAR Personnel Command Orders Number C-06-918123 dated 7 June  
1999 shows that the applicant was released from the USAR Control Group (Annual Training) and was assigned to the 982nd Signal Company, effective  
7 June 1999.  On these set of orders his expiration term of service was noted as 14 January 2000.

6.  Based on Headquarters, 335th Theater Signal Command Orders Number  
00-040-009, dated 9 February 2000 the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR effective 9 February 2000.  The additional instructions state that the applicant was held beyond his normal discharge date through no fault of his own.

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separation), chapter 4 provides in pertinent part, that Soldiers who are in an entry level status upon completion of their IET for less than 180 days will be uncharacterized, even though they have completed their IET successfully.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 be corrected to show his characterization of service as honorable for the period ending 9 July 1992.

2.  Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4 states that Soldiers who are in an entry level status upon completion of their IET for less than 180 days will be uncharacterized, even though they have completed their IET successfully.  Therefore, the character of service is properly recorded on his DD Form 214.  As such, he is not entitled to correction of his records to show honorable discharge.

3.  ABCMR notes that the applicant received an honorable discharged from the USAR upon completion of his reserve obligation effective 9 February 2000.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X____  __X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




       _   __X_____   ___
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080002787



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003552

    Original file (20080003552.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military service record shows he was appointed in the ARNG as an Armor officer, in the grade of 1LT/pay grade O-2, effective and with a DOR of 28 September 2006. These documents show, in pertinent part, the applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army, with appointment in the ARNG of the United States, in the grade of 2LT, effective 8 August 1992. b. These documents show, in pertinent part, the applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130008498

    Original file (AR20130008498.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard on 15 May 2000 for a period of 6 years. The record contains a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service). EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: Counsel provided DD Form 293 (Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States), a memorandum from her counsel, Mr. M, dated 21 December 2012, a letter from the Staff Judge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007171

    Original file (20070007171.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of US Army Military Personnel Center Orders 7-146; US Army Military Personnel Center Appointment authorization, dated 25 June 1987; State of North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, Office of The Adjutant General, Raleigh, North Carolina Orders 13-45, dated 16 January 1990; US Army Reserve Personnel Command Orders C-04-009719, dated 30 April 1990; State of North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, Office of The Adjutant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020082

    Original file (20110020082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records do not contain the promotion orders showing the promotion date. He provided a memorandum he submitted to the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command, St Louis, MO, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, dated 11 June 1999, requesting reconsideration for promotion to CPT. He provided a memorandum he received from an official at the USAR Personnel Command, St Louis, MO, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, dated 3 November 1999, stating this memorandum was in response to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004909

    Original file (20130004909.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the characterization of service on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 12 September 1992 be changed to show "honorable" service instead of "uncharacterized" service. The separation code on her DD Form 214 insinuates her service was questionable or negative and this most certainly was not the case. Paragraph 4-2h of Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, provided that Army National Guard of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016049

    Original file (20100016049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a result, documents were not available in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) for review by the 1994 and 1995 Department of the Army (DA) CPT Reserve Components Selection Boards (RCSB). He states he was selected by the 2010 CPT Promotion Board with the same documents in his 2010 board file that USA HRC presumes were reviewed in 1994 and 1995, with the exception of an additional unfavorable OER in 2009. The applicant contends that his records should be considered for promotion to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004567

    Original file (20110004567.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence clearly shows that on 29 September 1992, the applicant was voluntarily discharged, accepted appointment in the USAR, and was transferred to the IRR with annual VSI payments to be paid through the year 2020. In 1992, when the applicant left the Regular Army, the law required the last 8 years of qualifying service to have been in the Reserve. This requirement did not change to zero years until 5 years after his transfer to the Retired Reserve in 2000.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065638C070421

    Original file (2001065638C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant’s Official Military Personnel File was complete and there is no evidence to suggest a material error was present at the time it was reviewed during her promotion consideration by the 1991 and 1992 RCSB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053568C070420

    Original file (2001053568C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The application to the ABCMR contains the following exhibits: a 22 October 1999 letter to the applicant and his counsel stating the appeal of the OER covering the period 961001-970510 is returned without action because the OER in question has not been filed; a 7 October 1999 memorandum from counsel to the Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) appealing the OER cited previously; a 5 August 1999 memorandum from the Deputy Chief of Staff for the 335th Theater Signal Command to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008845

    Original file (20100008845.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that the characterization of service on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed to something other than "uncharacterized." Orders 131-19, Headquarters, 77th U.S. Army Reserve Command, Fort Totten, NY, dated 26 September 1994, show the applicant was discharged from the USAR effective 1 October 1994 with uncharacterized service.