Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002216
Original file (20080002216.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  12 June 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080002216 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his retired pay be increased based on his having received the Silver Star.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded the Silver Star in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).  He states that at the time of his retirement, he asked if he was entitled to get an additional 10 percent (%) in retired pay based on having been awarded the Silver Star and was told they did not know.  He claims that based on information he has received through Army Knowledge Online (AKO) and from United States Army Human Resources Command (HRC), he qualifies to receive an additional 10% in retired pay based on the Silver Star.

3.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application:  Enlisted Records Brief (ERB); Silver Star Orders and Citation; Application for Voluntary Retirement (DA Form 2339); Retirement Orders; and Separation Document (DD Form 214).  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's record shows that on 31 October 2005, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD), in the grade of sergeant first class (SFC), for the purpose of retirement.  At the time, he had completed a total of 20 years and 29 days of active military service.  

2.  The applicant's record shows that served in the RVN for 1 year and 1 day between 1968 and 1969, and that he was awarded the Silver Star for gallantry in action in the RVN on 3 July 1968.  

3.  On 8 March 2005, the applicant submitted a DA Form 2339 requesting retirement on 31 October 2005, and on 7 April 2005, his retirement application was approved.  

4.  Office of the Administrative Assistant to the Secretary, United States Army Resources and Programs Agency Orders 102-16, dated 12 April 2005, directed the applicant's REFRAD on 31 October 2005, and his placement on the Retired List, in the grade of SFC, on 1 November 2005.  

5.  On 31 October 2005, the applicant was honorably REFRAD for the purpose of retirement.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time includes the Silver Star in the list of awards contained in Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized).  

6.  Title 10 of the United States Code, Section 3991 (10 USC 3991) provides guidance on the computation of retired pay.  It states, in pertinent part, that if a member who is retired under 10 USC 3914 (Twenty-Year Law) had been credited by the Secretary of the Army with extraordinary heroism in the line of duty, the member’s retired pay shall be increased by 10 percent.  The Secretary’s determination as to extraordinary heroism is conclusive for all purposes. 

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Administrative Separations) provides the Army's enlisted separations policy.  Chapter 12 contains guidance on retirement, and Paragraph 12-4 contains guidance on the twenty-year retirement law 
(10 USC 3914) and outlines what constitutes extraordinary heroism in the line of duty for the purpose of awarding an additional 10 percent in retired pay.  It states, in pertinent part, that a Soldier who retires under the provisions of 10 USC 3914 and has been awarded the Medal of Honor, Distinguished Service Cross, or Navy Cross for extraordinary heroism will have his/her retired pay increased by 10 percent.  There are no regulatory provisions providing for an increase in retired pay based on award of the Silver Star.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he should have received an additional 
10 percent in retired pay based on his having been awarded the Silver Star was carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim.  

2.  By law, an additional 10 percent in retired pay is authorized to certain enlisted Soldiers who retire under the provisions of 10 USC 3914, who had been credited by the Secretary of the Army with extraordinary heroism in the line of duty.  The Secretary’s determination as to extraordinary heroism is identified in the governing regulation as those members who were awarded the Medal of Honor, Distinguished Service Cross, or Navy Cross for extraordinary heroism.  There are no regulatory provisions for granting an extraordinary heroism Secretarial determination, or the additional 10 percent in retired pay, based on award of the Silver Star.  As a result, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief. 

3.  The applicant and all others concerned should know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x ___  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________x______________
      	CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080002216



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080002216


2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002764C071029

    Original file (20070002764C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    10 USC 3390 provides guidance on the computation of retired pay and provides the authority to provide an additional 10 percent in retired pay for certain enlisted members retired under 10 USC 3914, who were credited with extraordinary heroism. It states, in pertinent part, that a Soldier who retires under 10 USC 3914 and has been awarded the Medal of Honor, Distinguished Service Cross, or Navy Cross for extraordinary heroism will have his/her retired pay increased 10 percent. The Secretary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005372

    Original file (20120005372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, USC, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Title 10, USC, section 3991 states any enlisted member who is credited with extraordinary heroism in the line of duty who retires after 20 or more years after federal service is entitled to a 10-percent increase in retired pay. It states Title 10, USC, section 3991 provides that any enlisted member who is credited with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000612

    Original file (20070000612.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his retired pay be increased due to his award of the Soldier’s Medal. It states that Title 10, USC 3991 provides that any enlisted member who is credited with extraordinary heroism in the line of duty who retires after 20 or more years active Federal service, is entitled to a 10 percent increase in retired pay, subject to the 75 percent limit on total retired pay. Therefore, based on the evidence and applicable Federal statute in this case, he is not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005907

    Original file (20120005907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was individually recognized in October 2009 by award of the Presidential Unit Citation for extraordinary heroism on 26 March 1970 in Vietnam * in accordance with all applicable regulations, directives, codes, and the Institute of Heraldry, the Presidential Unit Citation is equivalent to the Distinguished Service Cross * the Presidential Unit Citation is considered an individual award for those who actually participated in the cited action "credited by the Secretary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078696C070215

    Original file (2002078696C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 September 2001, the applicant's request for a 10 percent increase in his retirement pay, based upon his award of the Soldier's Medal for heroism, was forwarded to the Army Decorations Board for consideration. The law states: “If a member who is retired under section 3914 of this title has been credited by the Secretary of the Army with extraordinary heroism in the line of duty, the member’s retired pay shall be increased by 10 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (1) (but...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001156C071108

    Original file (20070001156C071108.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    LaVerne M. Douglas | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. An enlisted awardee of the Distinguished Flying Cross awarded for non-combat-related heroism, or the Soldier’s Medal may be credited by the Secretary of the Army with extraordinary heroism only if it is determined that the heroism display was equivalent to that required for award of the Distinguished Service Cross. Evidence shows the applicant was awarded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012089

    Original file (20140012089.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 May 1988 the Army Decorations Board denied the applicant's request for a 10 percent increase in retirement pay based on extraordinary heroism. As it was one crew chief was severely burned [the applicant] demonstrated extreme courage and risking his own life in moving the burning truck a safe distance " b. He writes, " I eventually chose [the applicant] as my primary gunner [he] proved himself focused and courageous during the many time we engaged the enemy it came as no surprise to me...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019241

    Original file (20100019241.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a 10 percent increase in his retired pay based on award of the Soldier's Medal. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraph 1-40(a), states that U. S. Code Title 10, section 3991 provides that any enlisted member who is credited with extraordinary heroism in line of duty who retires after 20 years or more years active Federal service, is entitled to 10 percent increase in retired pay, subject to the 75 percent limit on total retired pay. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000740

    Original file (20110000740.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * award of a 10-percent increase in his retired pay based on award of the Soldier's Medal with retroactive back payment if his request is approved * correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Korea Defense Service Medal * a signed copy of his DD Form 214 2. The letter stated the applicant was previously denied the 10-percent increase in his retired pay and the applicant could appeal the decision to Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006444

    Original file (20080006444.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Distinguished Service Cross is awarded to a person, who while serving in any capacity with the Army, distinguished himself or herself by extraordinary heroism while engaged in action against an enemy of the United States not justifying award of the Medal of Honor. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that a Soldier who has been awarded the Soldier's Medal may be credited with extraordinary heroism if it is...