Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078696C070215
Original file (2002078696C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 10 April 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002078696

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Mr. Lester Echols Member
Ms. Marla J. Troup Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the effective date of his 10 percent increase in retired pay based upon award of the Soldier's Medal for heroism be changed to 31 October 1973 instead of 20 September 2001.

APPLICANT STATES: That through no fault of his own, the determination of degree of heroism was not made at the time of award or at the time of his retirement. In support of his application, he submits a letter and a Memorandum, dated 24 October 2001, from the Military Awards Branch at U.S. Total Army Personnel Command.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant entered active duty on 17 September 1953 and retired on
31 October 1973 with over 20 years of service.

The applicant received the Soldier's Medal for heroism on 31 December 1966 in Vietnam.

On 20 September 2001, the applicant's request for a 10 percent increase in his retirement pay, based upon his award of the Soldier's Medal for heroism, was forwarded to the Army Decorations Board for consideration. The Board determined that the degree of heroism met the criteria for increased retired pay.

The Army Decorations Board, acting on behalf of the Secretary of the Army, approved the 10 percent increase in retired pay not to exceed the 75 percent limit on total retired pay to be effective 20 September 2001.

Paragraph 19e of Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time of the applicant’s retirement on 31 October 1973, states that “any enlisted man who is credited with extraordinary heroism in the line of duty….who retires after 20 or more years’ active Federal service, is entitled to 10 percent increase in retired pay, subject to the 75 percent limit on total retired pay. Any enlisted awardee of the Medal of Honor, the Distinguished Service Cross, or the Navy Cross satisfies the requirement for extraordinary heroism. An enlisted awardee of the Distinguished Flying Cross or the Soldier’s Medal may be credited by the Secretary of the Army with extraordinary heroism only if it determined that the heroism displayed was equivalent to that required for award of the Distinguished Service Cross.”

Paragraph 12-5c of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel), in effect at the time of the applicant’s retirement on 31 October 1973, provided for increased retired pay based on extraordinary heroism. Specifically the regulation stated: “An individual who has been awarded the Medal of Honor, Distinguished Service Cross, or Navy Cross for extraordinary heroism will, upon retirement under 10 USC 3914, have his retired pay increased 10 percent, provided his total retired pay (including the increase) does not exceed 75 percent of the basic pay upon which computed. In addition, an enlisted member who has been awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross, the Soldier’s Medal or equivalent Navy decoration may be credited by the Secretary of the Army with extraordinary heroism if it is determined that the heroism was equivalent to that required for award of the Distinguished Service Cross. Each case appearing to warrant Secretarial determination of extraordinary heroism will be submitted to HQDA [office symbols for PERSCOM] for determination of such entitlement.”

Title 10 United States Code section 3991 provides for computation of retired pay. Specifically, Title 10 United States Code section 3991(a)(2) provides for an additional 10 percent for certain enlisted members credited with extraordinary heroism. The law states: “If a member who is retired under section 3914 of this title has been credited by the Secretary of the Army with extraordinary heroism in the line of duty, the member’s retired pay shall be increased by 10 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (1) (but to not more than 75 percent of the retired pay base upon which the computation of such retired pay is based.) The Secretary’s determination as to extraordinary heroism is conclusive for all purposes.” Section 3914 refers to the voluntary retirement of Army enlisted members with 20 to 30 years of service.

An Audit of Erroneous Payments for Extraordinary Heroism Audit Report: MW 85-705, dated 30 September 1985, cites a 16 November 1984 opinion by The Judge Advocate General of the Army. This legal opinion essentially states that enlisted retirees are not eligible to receive heroism pay prior to the date on which the Army Decorations Board renders a determination that an award of the Soldier's Medal or the Distinguished Flying Cross involved an act of extraordinary heroism.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant received the Soldier's Medal for heroism on 31 December 1966 in Vietnam.

2. The applicant retired on 31 October 1973 after completing over 20 years of enlisted service without the 10 percent increase based on extraordinary heroism.

3. On 20 September 2001, the Army Decorations Board determined that the degree of heroism met the criteria for increased retired pay and approved a
10 percent increase in the applicant's retired pay not to exceed the 75 percent limit on total retired pay.


4. The Board considered the applicant's request that the effective date of his
10 percent increase in retired pay be changed to 31 October 1973 instead of
20 September 2001. However, a 16 November 1984 legal opinion by The Judge Advocate General of the Army states that enlisted retirees are not eligible to receive heroism pay prior to the date on which the Army Decorations Board renders a determination that an award of the Soldier's Medal or the Distinguished Flying Cross involved an act of extraordinary heroism. Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

FNE____ LE______ MJT_____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002078696
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20030410
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 136.0600
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001654

    Original file (20110001654.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraph 1-40 (Increased retired pay based on decorations - enlisted awardees), provides that any enlisted man who is credited with extraordinary heroism in the line of duty who retires after 20 or more years active Federal service, is entitled to 10% increase in retired pay, subject to the 75% limit on total retired pay. Army Regulation 600-8-22, paragraph 3-8, provides that the Distinguished Service Cross is awarded to a person, who while...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005907

    Original file (20120005907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was individually recognized in October 2009 by award of the Presidential Unit Citation for extraordinary heroism on 26 March 1970 in Vietnam * in accordance with all applicable regulations, directives, codes, and the Institute of Heraldry, the Presidential Unit Citation is equivalent to the Distinguished Service Cross * the Presidential Unit Citation is considered an individual award for those who actually participated in the cited action "credited by the Secretary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005372

    Original file (20120005372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, USC, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Title 10, USC, section 3991 states any enlisted member who is credited with extraordinary heroism in the line of duty who retires after 20 or more years after federal service is entitled to a 10-percent increase in retired pay. It states Title 10, USC, section 3991 provides that any enlisted member who is credited with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000740

    Original file (20110000740.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * award of a 10-percent increase in his retired pay based on award of the Soldier's Medal with retroactive back payment if his request is approved * correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Korea Defense Service Medal * a signed copy of his DD Form 214 2. The letter stated the applicant was previously denied the 10-percent increase in his retired pay and the applicant could appeal the decision to Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000612

    Original file (20070000612.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his retired pay be increased due to his award of the Soldier’s Medal. It states that Title 10, USC 3991 provides that any enlisted member who is credited with extraordinary heroism in the line of duty who retires after 20 or more years active Federal service, is entitled to a 10 percent increase in retired pay, subject to the 75 percent limit on total retired pay. Therefore, based on the evidence and applicable Federal statute in this case, he is not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001046

    Original file (20100001046.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 July 2009, the Army Decorations Board considered his request for a 10% increase in his retirement pay, based upon his award of the Soldier's Medal for heroism. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time of his retirement, provided, in pertinent part, that any enlisted man who is credited with extraordinary heroism in the line of duty who retires after 20 or more years active Federal service, is entitled to 10% increase in retired pay, subject to the 75% limit on total retired pay....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011869

    Original file (20100011869.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Soldier's Medal is awarded for distinguished heroism not involving actual conflict with the enemy. In order to grant the applicant’s request, he would have to show he had been credited by with extraordinary heroism equivalent to that required for award of the Distinguished Service Cross. The orders awarding the applicant the Soldier’s Medal stated that the Army Decorations Board determined that the circumstance surrounding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024862

    Original file (20100024862.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that he be given an additional 10 percent in retired pay for his Soldier's Medal. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Soldier's Medal is awarded for distinguished heroism not involving actual conflict with the enemy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012089

    Original file (20140012089.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 May 1988 the Army Decorations Board denied the applicant's request for a 10 percent increase in retirement pay based on extraordinary heroism. As it was one crew chief was severely burned [the applicant] demonstrated extreme courage and risking his own life in moving the burning truck a safe distance " b. He writes, " I eventually chose [the applicant] as my primary gunner [he] proved himself focused and courageous during the many time we engaged the enemy it came as no surprise to me...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030316

    Original file (20100030316.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a 10 percent (%) increase in his retirement pay based on award of the Soldier's Medal. An enlisted awardee of the Distinguished Flying Cross awarded for non-combat-related heroism, or the Soldier’s Medal may be credited by the Secretary of the Army with extraordinary heroism only if it is determined that the heroism displayed was equivalent to that required for award of the Distinguished Service Cross. The evidence shows that enlisted personnel awarded the Soldier's...