Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011656
Original file (20140011656.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 March 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140011656 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his record to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  He also requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart.

2.  He states:

* his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was wounded in March 1970 and received shrapnel wounds to his legs
* he does not know why the Army Good Conduct Medal was not annotated on his DA Form 20
* he was told in March 1970 that he would receive the Purple Heart prior to his departure from Vietnam
* it never happened nor were his records corrected

3.  He provides:

* a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* two DD Forms 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty)
* a DA Form 20, audited 19 December 1972
* orders



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 2 July 1968.  He served in Vietnam from 24 June 1969 to 22 June 1970.  

3.  His record contains a DA Form 20, audited on 19 June 1970, that shows in:

	a.  item 38 (Record of Assignments):

		(1)  he received an "unsatisfactory" rating for conduct during his period of service from 5 April to 5 June 1969; 

		(2)  during his service in Vietnam, he was assigned to the Howitzer Battery, 1st Squadron, 11th Armored Cavalry, from 28 June 1969 to 18 June 1970;

	b.  item 40 (wounds), he received a fragment wound to his right leg on 
19 August 1970 (however, the applicant was not serving in an active duty status on this date); and

	c.  item 41 (Awards and Decorations), does not show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal or Purple Heart.

4.  He served until he was released on 23 June 1970 after completing 1 year, 
11 months, and 22 days of active duty service.  His DD Form 214, dated 23 June 1970, shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and Army Commendation Medal.


5.  On 25 February 1972, he again enlisted in the RA and served until he was discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment on 28 May 1974.  This 
DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and two Overseas Service Bars.

6.  He submitted and his record contains a DA Form 20, audited on 19 December 1972, that corrected the date entered in item 40 of his DA Form 20, dated 
19 June 1970, to show he received shrapnel in both legs in March 1970.

7.  On 29 May 1974, he reenlisted in the RA and served until he was honorably discharged on 28 May 1978 after serving 8 years, 2 months, and 26 days of total active service.  This DD Form 214, dated 28 May 1978, shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and two Overseas Service Bars.

8.  He submitted General Order Number 497, dated 4 May 1976, which shows he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal for service from 25 February 1972 to 24 February 1975.

9.  A review of the applicant's service record shows no derogatory information in the form of lost time, nonjudicial punishment, or suspension of favorable personnel actions that would disqualify him for the second award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for his period of service from 25 February 1975 to 
24 February 1978.  There are no entries on his DA Form 20 to indicate his commanders denied him award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

10.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active enlisted service.  This period was 3 years except in those cases when the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.  

11.  The applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster as being wounded in action in March 1970.

12.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Military Awards Branch, which is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence that shows the applicant served a qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal during his first period of active service.  The evidence of record shows that during the periods from 
2 July 1968 to 23 June 1970, the applicant received an "unsatisfactory" conduct rating.  Therefore, he is not entitled have his DD Form 214, dated 23 June 1970, corrected to show this medal.

2.  General orders show the applicant was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 25 February 1972 to 24 February 1975.  Therefore, he is entitled to have his DD Form 214, dated 28 May 1978, corrected to show this medal.

3.  There is no evidence in his records of any court-martial convictions, personnel actions, or statements that would justify disqualification for the second award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Based on the applicable regulation, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for the period 
25 February 1975 to 24 February 1978.

4.  The evidence of record shows he received fragment wounds to both legs while serving in Vietnam (on an unknown date) in March 1970.  Although there are no available orders showing award of the Purple Heart or that his name is listed on the Vietnam casualty listing, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Form 214 dated 25 May 1978 to show award of the Purple Heart.

BOARD VOTE:

___x_____  ____x___  ____x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  _________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  _________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  _________  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the:

* Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for the period 25 February 1975 to 24 February 1978
* Purple Heart for fragment wounds received in the Republic of Vietnam in March 1970

	b.  adding to his DD Form 214, dated 28 May 1978, the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) and Purple Heart.



      ___________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011656



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011656



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084983C070212

    Original file (2003084983C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no entry in Item 9 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns) of the DA Form 2-1 showing that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart. The SF 600 in the applicant's service records shows that the applicant was wounded in Vietnam on 12 September 1970 and that the wounds required medical treatment; however, the summary does not contain sufficient information to conclude that it was the result of hostile action. Neither the SF 88 nor the SF 93 that he completed in conjunction with this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010751

    Original file (20060010751.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was awarded two Purple Hearts in Vietnam. The evidence of record shows that the applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Good Conduct Medal on 22 January 1972. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing award of the Purple Heart for wounds received as a result of enemy action in the Republic of Vietnam on 27 June 1970; the Expert Qualification Badge, with Rifle Bar (M-14); the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008304

    Original file (20130008304.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DA Pamphlet 672-3 also shows his unit, Company C, 75th Infantry, was cited for the: * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, for the period 1 August 1965 through 16 April 1971, by DAGO Number 54, dated 1974 * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, for the period 15 April 1969 through 16 March 1971, by DAGO Number 5, dated 1973 23. The evidence of record shows he was awarded two awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005955

    Original file (20080005955.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's several DA Forms 20 do not show award of the Purple Heart. In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. XXX _______________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016007

    Original file (20080016007.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s records show he was issued three awards of the Good Conduct Medal, issued on miscellaneous dates, by various Headquarters, for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity, from 4 February 1967 through 3 February 1960 (1st Award); from 18 December 1961 through 17 December 1964 (2nd Award); and from 20 March 1965 through 19 March 1968 (3rd Award). Item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214, dated 23 February 1972, shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010679

    Original file (20060010679.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060010679 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Evidence of record clearly shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action against the enemy on 11 March 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067440C070402

    Original file (2002067440C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), Item 40 (Wounds) has neither entry, nor does it otherwise indicate that he was wounded while in RVN. On 13 August 1975, he was returned to the United States and was assigned to the U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Jackson, South Carolina, awaiting separation. The applicant's DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) dated 15 August 1975, Item 24 shows the following awards, the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004471C070206

    Original file (20050004471C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. There is no evidence of record and the applicant provides none to show he was wounded as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 23 July 1970 through 28 January 1972; and b. adding the Army Good...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001898

    Original file (20070001898.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds received in the Republic of Vietnam. The applicant states that he was wounded on 17 February 1970 while in the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show that, in addition to the awards shown on his DD Form 214, his authorized awards include the Meritorious Unit commendation, three...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001874

    Original file (20090001874.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant's military service records awarding him the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period of service from 28 March 1969 to...