Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001253
Original file (20080001253.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  13 May 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080001253 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  




Director



Analyst

      The following members, a quorum, were present:


M

Chairperson

M

Member

M

Member
	The Board considered the following evidence: 

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).



THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the following items on his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) be corrected:  item number 23 (Type of Separation); item number 25 (Separation Authority); item number 26 (Separation Code); item number 27 (Reentry Code); and item number 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that item number 23 on his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show that he was discharged; that item number 25 should be corrected to read Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4.24B(3); that item number 26 should be corrected to read JFL (Severance Pay); that item number 27 be corrected to show that he was assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code 3; and that item number 28 should be corrected to read Disability, Severance Pay, in accordance with United States Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) Orders D228-14, dated 15 August 2007.

3.  The applicant provides in support of his application, a copy of USAPDA Orders D228-14; and a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 11 October 1995, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in Jacksonville, Florida, for 4 years, in the pay grade of E-3.  He successfully completed his training as an air traffic control operator.  

2.  The applicant's records show that he extended his enlistment for a period of 1 month on 1 April 1999.  He reenlisted in the Army for 6 years on 12 August 1999.

3.  The facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant's release from active duty (REFRAD) are not present in the available record.  The DD Form 214 that he was furnished at the time of his REFRAD indicates that he was honorably retired, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24B(2) by reason of a physical disability on 18 May 2006, and he was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL).  He was furnished a separation code of SFK (disability, temporary) and a RE Code of RE-4. 

4.  On 23 July 2007, a Physical Evaluation Board convened to determine whether the applicant should remain on the TDRL or be separated from the Army with severance pay.  He was diagnosed with chronic pain, left shoulder following 

distal clavicle resection and cervical spondylosis, without significant motor abnormality.  The PEB found that based on a review of the TDRL examination, the applicant remained unfit to reasonably perform the duties required by previous grade and military specialty.  The PEB recommended that he be separated with severance pay, with a combined disability rating of 20 percent.  

5.  Accordingly, on 15 August 2007, USAPDA Orders D228-14 were published removing the applicant from the TDRL and discharging him from the Army, with severance pay, due to a permanent physical disability with a 20 percent combined service-connected disability rating.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect an individual's service as it exists on the date of REFRAD or discharge.  A DD Form 214 will not be prepared for personnel removed from the TDRL.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  It appears the applicant's DD Form 214 was prepared in accordance with the applicable regulation.

2.  On 18 May 2006, he was retired under the provisions of Army Regulation 
635-40, paragraph 4-24B(2), by reason of a temporary physical disability and placed on the TDRL.  He was furnished a DD Form 214 that accurately reflects this information.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 also accurately reflects a separation code of SFK (disability, temporary), and a RE code of RE-4.  While it is the applicant's desire to have his DD Form 214 corrected to reflect his current status, the applicable regulation provides that the DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect an individual's service as it exists on the date of his/her REFRAD or discharge.  Although he was subsequently discharged from the Army, with severance pay on 15 August 2007, his DD Form 214 was appropriately prepared at the time that he was REFRAD and placed on the TDRL.  The applicant was not on active duty at the time he was removed from the TDRL and thus he is not entitled to be reissued a DD Form 214 or to  have his current DD Form 214 corrected.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__XXX __  __XXX__  __XXX__   DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___        XXX                ___
                CHAIRPERSON


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080001253



4


DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
1901 SOUTH BELL STREET, 2ND FLOOR
ARLINGTON, VA  22202-4508




Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022412

    Original file (20100022412.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 8 August 2010, a PEB determined his condition had not improved to the extent that he was fit for duty and recommended he be removed from the TDRL, given a disability rating of 0 percent, and be given severance pay. The regulation shows the narrative reason for this type of separation is "Disability, Temporary." Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) states prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020326

    Original file (20140020326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * she was not retired * she was removed from the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) on 12 April 2001 * she is unable to receive credit for her military service because her DD Form 214 lists her as retired * she needs an updated DD Form 214 to show her as separated, not retired * item 26 of her DD Form 214 shows a separation code of SFK with a retired separation status 3. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * orders removing her from the TDRL, dated 12 April...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026746

    Original file (20100026746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was retired from active duty on 23 September 2008 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(2), by reason of temporary disability with a corresponding SPD code of SFK. Therefore, he received the appropriate reason for separation and SPD code associated with his retirement from active duty and he is not entitled to the requested relief. A member may be found fit for duty, permanently retired, extended on the TDRL, or separated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018890

    Original file (20070018890.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, he is no longer on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) and would like his RE-4 code changed accordingly based on his honorable discharge. Although a PDES packet containing the specific facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant's medical separation processing is not on file, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009395

    Original file (20090009395.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-5 on 31 January 2002, for 3 years, with prior enlisted service. The evidence shows the applicant was retired from active duty for temporary disability, on 25 August 2005, issued a DD Form 214, and placed on the TDRL. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record that his assigned RE Code is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024892

    Original file (20100024892.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 April 2010, the applicant was removed from the TDRL and discharged from the service with severance pay because of permanent physical disability with a disability rating of 20%. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative further states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Although the applicant was properly...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017938

    Original file (20080017938.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The TDRL examination further showed that it was unlikely that the applicant would be able to perform military duty in the future and it was recommended that his case be medically boarded. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant's contention that the reason for his discharge and his RE code of 4R code should be changed to allow him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090862C070212

    Original file (2003090862C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. Inasmuch as he was not serving on active duty at the time he was removed from the TDRL and was placed on the PDRL, he was not authorized to have a new DD Form 214 issued or to have his last DD Form 214 changed to reflect his current status, because the DD Form 214 is only issued to reflect the most...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020108

    Original file (20110020108.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states the SPD code "SFK is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(2), by reason of disability, temporary. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative) states prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210, section XII, states that as the result of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011709

    Original file (20080011709.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 September 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080011709 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's military medical records are not available. Army Regulation 601-210, paragraph 4-5(b) states any applicant who was last separated or discharged from any Component of the Armed Forces for medical reasons with or without disability will require a waiver for enlistment into the Regular Army or Army Reserve.