Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000448
Original file (20080000448.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       24 July 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080000448 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to void his 15 December 2004 reenlistment and to show that he reenlisted after he deployed to Iraq and is now eligible for a tax free $15,000 bonus.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he should have been in a stop loss 
status and not required to reenlist.  If he had not been forced to reenlist on 
15 December 2004, he would have deployed to Iraq and reenlisted in theater, which would have made him eligible for the $15,000 bonus tax free.

3.  The applicant provides copies of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) Policy Guidance, dated 14 December 2004; Change 
1 to the SRIP, dated 14 January 2005; email communications; Alert Orders; Stop Loss Message [Mobilization Order]; Reenlistment Memorandum dated 
18 May 2006; and an Information Paper with enclosures [undated, unsigned].

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  At the time of the applicant's application, he was serving on active duty as a staff sergeant, pay grade E-6, in the Nebraska Army National Guard.

2.  In 2004, the applicant was assigned as an Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) with B Troop, 1st Squadron, 167th Armored Cavalry Regiment.  

3.  Message, National Guard Bureau, date/time group 251721Z November 2004, directed the Commander, 167th Armored Cavalry Regiment to alert all assigned personnel of a pending mobilization.

4.  Message, Department of the Army, date/time group 250130Z November 2004, provided authorization to mobilize the forward element of the 167th Armored Cavalry Regiment effective 3 January 2005. 

5.  On 14 December 2004, the National Guard Bureau (NGB) announced the FY 2005 SRIP.  It provided at paragraph 5i (3) for a $15,000 enlistment bonus for prior service Soldiers who contracted a 6 year enlistment.  It excluded, in part, Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) Soldiers.

6.  On 15 December 2004, the applicant extended his current enlistment, which ran through 21 April 2005, for 6 years.  At the time he was an AGR Soldier assigned to B Troop, 1st Squadron, 167th Armored Cavalry Regiment, in Freemont, Nebraska.

7.  The information paper provided by the applicant states that he was alerted on 10 January 2005 of his deployment with the 1st Squadron, 167th Armored Cavalry Regiment Forward.

8.  On 15 January 2005, the NGB announced a change to the FY 2005 SRIP to include Title 32 AGR Soldiers who were mobilized on Title 10 status.  The effective date of this change was 14 December 2004.

9.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the chief, Personnel Division, NGB, Arlington, Virginia.  It stated that the applicant was a Title 32 AGR at the time of his extension and had been alerted about a potential deployment.  The deployment alert put the applicant on a 90-day stop loss and eliminated the need to extend his contract in order to serve in [the Iraq] theater.  The applicant was advised to extend his contract and did so on 
15 December 2004 for a period of 6 years.  On 14 January 2005, a memorandum was published by the NGB stating that, effective 14 December 2004, Title 32 AGR and Technician Soldiers serving in a Title 10 status in support of the Global War on Terrorism were eligible for reenlistment/extension bonuses.  It recommended approval of the applicant's request to receive an extension bonus.

10.  On 22 April 2008, the applicant concurred with the advisory opinion. 




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence clearly shows that AGR Soldiers who were mobilized on Title 10 status on or after 14 December 2004, were eligible for the SRIP. When the applicant extended his enlistment he was a Title 32 AGR Soldier assigned in the United States.  He did not commence his deployment until some time after 10 January 2005.  

2.  The applicant's contention that he was "forced" to reenlist at that time is not substantiated by any available evidence.  The NGB asserts, without any supporting evidence, that he was "advised" to extend even though he still had more than a year until the end of his current enlistment.

3.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X ___  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ X  _______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080000448





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080000448



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001362

    Original file (20090001362.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of the Board's denial of his previous request for correction of his military records to void his 15 December 2004 reenlistment and to show that he reenlisted after he deployed to Iraq and would have been eligible for a tax free $15,000 bonus. In the Board's first consideration of this case, the Board found that the applicant was an AGR Soldier at the time he extended his enlistment agreement. To correct the term of an extension when it is other than...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007549

    Original file (20080007549.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant also provides a memorandum, dated 24 January 2006, subject: Implementation Guidance for Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for Army National Guard (ARNG) Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) Soldiers; an extract from Title 37, U. S. Code, section 308, with interpretive notes and decisions; a letter, dated 25 October 2005, from the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Reserve Affairs) to a Member of Congress; an email, dated 5 May 2005; her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000078

    Original file (20150000078.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was erroneously paid the SLRP incentive while deployed in 2005 * if not for the erroneous payment, he would have been eligible for SLRP when he later reenlisted in 2011 when the SLRP maximum was $50,000 * he was first made aware that he was not eligible for SLRP payment due to being a dual-status military technician through the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) Incentives Task Force audit process * he mobilized in January 2005 while serving as a dual-status...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017938

    Original file (20130017938.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides and his records contain a PSEB Addendum, dated 5 December 2008, wherein it stated, in part: a. The G-1 official stated his PSEB contract was terminated as of 22 October 2011 when he voluntarily moved to a different MOS than the MOS he contracted for and out of an MTOE unit into a TDA unit. The evidence of record shows the applicant did contract for 6 years in MOS 11B in an MTOE unit and from 22 October 2011 to 3 November 2013, he failed to do so, even if at the time...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022385

    Original file (20130022385.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He stated: * review of the applicant's record showed he extended his ARNG enlistment on 10 April 2005 for 6 years in MOS 88M for an REB of $15,000.00 * the applicant served the full term of his extended contract and his MOS appeared on the 2005 Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) list 7. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State Army National Guard records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010270

    Original file (20140010270 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) shows the applicant enlisted in the ARNG of the United States (ARNGUS) and CAARNG on 24 June 2005 for a period of 6 years. The applicant contends that his SLRP eligibility should be reinstated and he should be relieved of the debt because he was eligible to participate in the SLRP; the service representative failed to complete an SLRP Addendum at the time of his enlistment; he subsequently completed the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004553

    Original file (20140004553.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests relief from the recoupment of the Officer Accession Bonus (OAB) and Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) funds he received. His record does not contain a contract, OAB or SLRP addendum. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State ARNG records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing he and all other officials properly executed an OAB addendum on 16 August 2008 * showing his OAB addendum contained a BCN * prorating his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011483

    Original file (20140011483.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's OMPF and ARNG record contains enlistment/reenlistment/ extension documents which indicate the following: a. DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment), dated 16 October 2008, shows he extended his 17 December 2005 enlistment for 1 year making his new expiration term of service (ETS) date 16 December 2009. b. A Guard Incentive Management System computer print-out that includes the following information which shows a contract was executed authorizing the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018107

    Original file (20140018107.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides, in order of submission: * DA Form 4836, dated 15 April 2007 * page 2 of his NGB Form 600-7-3-R-E (Annex R to DD Form 4 (Enlistment/ Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) or DA Form 4836 – REB Addendum – ARNG of the United States) (14 December 2004) * CAARNG memorandum, dated 19 August 2012, subject: Request for Documentation Supporting Your Incentive(s) * U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Plea Agreement for former CAARNG...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011919

    Original file (20130011919.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he remains entitled to his $15,000 Reenlistment Bonus (REB) and cancellation of any recoupment action. An NGB Form 600-7-3-R-E (Annex R to DD Form 4 or DA Form 4836 Reenlistment/Extension Decentralized State Incentive Pilot Program Addendum), dated 19 September 2011. c. A DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment), dated 13 June 2012. d. A Joint Force Headquarters - Montana memorandum, Subject: Exception to Policy...