Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070019039
Original file (20070019039.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  1 May 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070019039 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.




Director



Analyst
      The following members, a quorum, were present:




Chairperson



Member



Member
	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).



THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his reentry (RE) code of RE-3 be upgraded.   

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he is currently serving in the New York Army National Guard (NYARNG) and trying to enter active duty in the Active Guard Reserve (AGR) program.  He states that he was discharged under reduction in strength provisions and was never informed he could not reenter the military on a full time basis.  He claims he has been informed that the only RE-3 code allowed entry into the AGR program is those members who were separated from active duty for hardship, and in order to enter the AGR program, he would need to have an RE-1 or RE-2 code.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his separation document (DD Form 214) in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 11 September 1984.  He was trained in, awarded, and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 75F (Personnel Information System Management Specialist), and specialist (SPC) is the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty.  


3.  The applicant's record shows that during his active duty tenure, he earned the following awards:  National Defense Service Medal; Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award); Army Achievement Medal (2nd Award); Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award); Army Service Ribbon; Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon; Overseas Service Ribbon; Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar; and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar.

4.  On 18 February 1992, the applicant was honorably discharged, in the rank of SPC, after completing a total of 7 years, 5 months, and 8 days of active military service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows, in Item 25 (Separation Authority), that he was separated under the provisions of Paragraph 16-8, Army Regulation 635-200.  Item 26 (Separation Code) shows he was assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JCC and Item 27 shows he was assigned an RE code of RE-3.  Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) lists the reason for his separation as "FY92 Enlisted Volunteer Early Transition Program," and Item 18 (Remarks) shows he received a Special Benefit payment of $16,243.57.  The applicant authenticated the separation document with his signature in Item 21 (Signature of Member Being Separated) on the date of his discharge.  

5.  Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the United States Army Reserve (USAR).  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.  RE-4 applies to persons who have a nonwaivable disqualification.  RE-3 applies to persons who have a waivable disqualification.  

6.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code JCC is the appropriate code to assign to RA Soldiers who were discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 16-8, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of reduction in force.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table stipulates that an RE-3 is the proper code to assign to members separated under these provisions.  


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his RE-3 code needs to be changed because he was not informed it would prevent him from full time service permanently was carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support his claim. 

2.  By regulation, RE-3 is the proper code to assign to members who are assigned an SPD code of JCC who were discharged by reason of reduction in force.  The evidence of record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 that shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 16-8, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of "FY92 Enlisted Volunteer Early Transition Program", and that he was assigned an SPD code of JCC and an 
RE code of 3 accordingly.  This separation document carries with it a presumption of Government regularity.  

3.  The record confirms the applicant authenticated the DD Form 214 with his signature on the date of his discharge.  In effect, his signature was his verification that the information contained on the separation document, to include the 
RE code entry, was correct at the time the separation document was prepared and issued.  Therefore, absent evidence to the contrary, it is presumed the 
RE-3 code assigned was and remains valid.  As a result, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support a change to the RE code.  

4.  The applicant is advised that although no change to his RE code is being recommended, the RE-3 code he was assigned does not permanently disqualify him from further full time service as he indicates.  RE-3 applies to persons who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service; however, a waiver of the disqualification is allowed.  Therefore, if he desires to enlist, he should contact a local recruiter to determine his eligibility.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of RE codes.  

5.  The information the applicant provides regarding his entry into the AGR program is a matter of policy and is governed by the officials responsible for the program.  The applicant is advised to discuss this policy with the responsible officials and determine if he can submit a request for an exception to policy and/or waiver of his RE-3 code in order to enter the AGR program.  


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x  ___  ___x ____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _________x_____________
                CHAIRPERSON


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20070019039



2


DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
1901 SOUTH BELL STREET 2ND FLOOR
ARLINGTON, VA  22202-4508




Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001679

    Original file (20140001679.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, his record contains a DD Form 214 which shows he was honorably discharged from active duty in pay grade E-2 on 12 April 1995. The regulation provided that prior to discharge or release from active duty individual would be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The regulation states the: * SPD code of "LCC" be used for individuals involuntarily released from active duty after being denied reenlistment based on reduction in force, strength...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004054

    Original file (20080004054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 27 July 2000. The evidence of record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 that shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service, and that he was assigned an SPD code of LBK and an RE code of 3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019896

    Original file (20110019896.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8, with an SPD of JCC. RE code "3" is the correct code for Soldiers separated by reason of reduction in forces.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040006181C070208

    Original file (20040006181C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Michael J. Flynn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant’s record shows that at the time of his application to the Board, he was serving as a member of the Maryland Army National Guard (MDARNG), in the rank of sergeant (SGT). The evidence of record confirms the applicant’s RA separation processing was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064339C070421

    Original file (2001064339C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that as a result of the incorrect SPD code assignment and entry into her separation document, she received a notice of debt in the amount of $21,655.11 from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), Denver, Colorado. She claims that, she was authorized to receive a Special Separation Benefit (SSB) payment of $22,000.00 at separation, but because of the assignment of the incorrect SPD code number, DFAS officials continue to indicate, she is indebted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026085

    Original file (20100026085.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show a reentry (RE) code of "1" vice "4" and a corresponding separation program designator (SPD) code. Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations), paragraph 16-8, in effect at the time, states, in pertinent part, that Soldiers may be separated prior to expiration of term of service. The SPD code of "JCC" is the correct code for Soldiers discharged under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000471

    Original file (20120000471.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    National Guard Regulation 600-200 states Soldiers separated with RE code "3" are not fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but this disqualification is waivable. The available records do not show evidence of error in the RE code entered on the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 June 1992. The available records do not show the SPD code assigned to Soldiers discharged based on a DCSS at the time.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130009555

    Original file (AR20130009555.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 July 1979, for a period of 3 years. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. However, Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028931

    Original file (20100028931.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 601-280 (Army Retention Program) paragraph 10-5 governs screening procedures and states, in pertinent part, that appropriate Department of the Army Selection Boards will review the performance portion of the OMPF, the DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record Part-I) and DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record Part-II), and other authorized documents. The general considered the applicant’s response and the recommendations of his chain of command and elected to file the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017360

    Original file (20100017360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 21 February 1986. The SPD code "JCC" is the correct code for Soldiers discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8. Therefore, he received the appropriate RE code associated with his discharge.