RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 15 April 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070018765
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.
Director
Analyst
The following members, a quorum, were present:
Chairperson
Member
Member
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC).
2. The applicant states, in effect, that his high blood pressure and right eye tearing should be approved disabilities for CRSC benefits because they were incurred as a result of Agent Orange exposure.
3. The applicant provides a CRSC Reconsideration Decision, dated 19 June 2007 in support of this application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC), as established by Section 1413a, Title 10, United States Code, as amended, provides for the payment of the amount of money a military retiree would receive from the VA for combat related disabilities if it wasnt for the statutory prohibition for a military retiree to receive a VA disability pension. Payment is made by the Military Department, not the VA, and is tax free. Eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of service creditable for reserve retirement at age 60) and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Such disabilities must be compensated by the VA and rated at least 10% disabling. For periods before 1 January 2004 (the date this statute was amended), members had to have disabilities for which they have been awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 10% disabled or who are rated at least 60% disabled as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Military retirees who are approved for CRSC must have waived a portion of their military retired pay since CRSC consists of the Military Department returning a portion of the waived retired pay to the military retiree.
2. On 19 June 2007, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch denied the applicants request for reconsideration of his previous request for CRSC. Specifically, the
VA informed the applicant that there was no verifiable documentation to support that his disabilities were service-related.
3. There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided evidence which shows that he sustained a VA Rated disability as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.
4. The Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD), Military Personnel Policy has provided policy guidance on the processing of CRSC appeals. In that guidance it was stated that in order for a condition to be considered combat-related, there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The CRSC criteria is specifically for those military retirees who have combat- related disabilities. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. The military retiree must show that the disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing specially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving.
2. Although the applicant contends that his high blood pressure and right eye tearing were incurred as a result of Agent Orange exposure, the applicant's records do not contain any evidence and the applicant does not provide sufficient evidence that support this claim.
3. Additionally, there is no evidence in the available records showing that his injuries were sustained while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing specially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving.
4. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicants VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.
5. Although, there is insufficient evidence to grant the relief requested, this by no means diminishes the applicants dedicated service to and sacrifices for a grateful nation.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
PRM____ JGH_____ KSJ____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
P H.M. _
CHAIRPERSON
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20070018765
2
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
1901 SOUTH BELL STREET, 2ND FLOOR
ARLINGTON, VA 22202-4508
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015325
The applicant requests that the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) determination be corrected to show he is eligible for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) for his arteriosclerotic heart disease. The guidance states that in order for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002403
The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show his malignant schwannoma [nerve sheath tumor] was determined to have been incurred as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war and that this disability is eligible for award of Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018831
The applicant requests, in effect, that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Specifically, the VA determined the following conditions to be service-related but there is insufficient evidence to show that they were combat-related: a. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicants VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012162
The applicant requests that his tuberculosis be approved for Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC). The applicant states his medical records prove conclusively that his tuberculosis was caused, or aggravated, by his participation in armed conflict in Vietnam. In the NARSUM it was stated that the applicant had been in Vietnam for 16 months prior to his admission to the hospital.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014983
There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided evidence which shows that the Dermatophytosis and Lumbosacral or Cervical Strain were sustained as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. Without evidence to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011523
Specifically, the VA informed the applicant that his disabilities were service-related but there was insufficient evidence to show that they were combat-related or that they were sustained during training exercises that simulate war. There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided evidence which shows that he sustained a VA Rated disability as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009541C070206
Randolph J. Fleming | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013327
Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano Director Mrs. Victoria A. Donaldson Analyst The following members, a quorum, were present: Ms. Linda D. Simmons Chairperson Mr. David K. Haasenritter Member Mr. Edward E. Montgomery Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided evidence which shows that he sustained a VA Rated disability as a direct result of armed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010334
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for hearing loss be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). The applicant has not stated, and there is no evidence which shows, that his VA rated disability is combat related for CRSC purposes.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018769
The applicant requests, in effect, that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided evidence which shows that he sustained a VA Rated disability as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Without evidence to establish a direct,...