RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 8 April 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070014983
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.
Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano
Director
Mrs. Victoria A. Donaldson
Analyst
The following members, a quorum, were present:
Ms. Linda D. Simmons
Chairperson
Mr. David K. Haasenritter
Member
Mr. Edward E. Montgomery
Member
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC).
2. The applicant states that although there is no error in his records, documentation that would have supported his claim was not prepared due to the fact that the CRSC program did not begin until 2003 which was after his retirement in 1997.
3. The applicant provides a CRSC Reconsideration Decision, dated 8 June 2007 and associated medical documentation in support of this application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC), as established by Section 1413a, Title 10, United States Code, as amended, provides for the payment of the amount of money a military retiree would receive from the VA for combat related disabilities if it wasnt for the statutory prohibition for a military retiree to receive a VA disability pension. Payment is made by the Military Department, not the VA, and is tax free. Eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of service creditable for reserve retirement at age 60) and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Such disabilities must be compensated by the VA and rated at least 10% disabling. For periods before 1 January 2004 (the date this statute was amended), members had to have disabilities for which they have been awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 10% disabled or who are rated at least 60% disabled as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Military retirees who are approved for CRSC must have waived a portion of their military retired pay since CRSC consists of the Military Department returning a portion of the waived retired pay to the military retiree.
2. On 8 June 2007, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch verified that the applicant's "Deformity of the Penis" and "Diabetes Mellitus" were caused by a combat-related situation and awarded a 20 percent disability rating. The USAPDA informed the applicant that he was receiving Combat-Related Special Monthly Compensation for these disabilities. The USAPDA CRSC further indicated that they were unable to verify as a combat-related disability the following conditions: Dermatophytosis and Lumbosacral or Cervical Strain. Specifically, the VA informed the applicant that they were unable to verify the applicant's claim because there was insufficient evidence to show that they were combat-related.
3. There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided evidence which shows that the Dermatophytosis and Lumbosacral or Cervical Strain were sustained as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.
4. The Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD), Military Personnel Policy has provided policy guidance on the processing of CRSC appeals. In that guidance it was stated that in order for a condition to be considered combat-related, there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The CRSC criteria is specifically for those military retirees who have combat- related disabilities. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. The military retiree must show that the disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing specially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving.
2. Although the applicant contends that the CRSC program did not start until 2003 which is after his 1997 discharge, the applicant's records do not show and he did not provide sufficient evidence showing that his Dermatophytosis and Lumbosacral or Cervical Strain were incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing specially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving.
3. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicants VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
_LDS____ _DKH___ _EEM___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
__Linda D. Simmons___
CHAIRPERSON
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009761C070206
The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for lumbosacral or cervical strain be approved for Combat- Related Special Compensation (CRSC). The applicant provides the denial of his request to reconsider his CRSC application and select military and VA records. If the applicant wishes additional VA rated disabilities to be considered for CRSC, he must first submit a rating request to the VA and, if approved, submit a request for CRSC for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002573C070205
Peguine M. Taylor | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017498
For periods before 1 January 2004 (the date this statute was amended), members had to have disabilities for which they have been awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 10 percent disabled or who are rated at least 60 percent disabled as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Notwithstanding the applicant's contention, there is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007947C070205
Scott W. Faught | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). CRSC determinations require evidence of a direct, causal relationship to the military retiree’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014628
He further states that the VA rated him at 50 percent for his sleep apnea and that the CRSC Agency is refusing to grant compensation for this condition. The applicant's records clearly show that the USAPDA determined that he is entitled to some CRSC benefits. However, there is no evidence and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to show that he is entitled additional CRSC benefits based on his sleep apnea condition.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001761C070205
Ronald D. Gant | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for lumbosacral or cervical strain be approved for Combat- Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disability to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007796C070206
Allen L. Raub | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for his back be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006357C070206
Richard G. Sayre | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for back strain be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disability to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011330C070206
Jeanette B. McPherson | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides the denial of his request to reconsider his CRSC application, and VA medical records. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009512C070206
Qawiy A. Sabree | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.