Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018291
Original file (20070018291.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  29 April 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070018291 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.




Director



Analyst

      The following members, a quorum, were present:




Chairperson



Member



Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).



THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his assigned branch of ordnance (OD) at the time of his retirement be changed to field artillery (FA), his originally assigned officer branch.

2.  The applicant essentially states that he was originally commissioned as an FA officer effective 15 May 1955, but that he was reassigned as an OD officer on 
10 February 1968 due to reorganization in his unit.  He also states, in effect, that no error or injustice is shown in his military record, but requests that his assigned branch be redesignated as FA because he prefers to be listed in his combat branch designation.  

3.  The applicant provides his original officer appointment letter assigning him to the FA branch effective 15 May 1955; a letter, dated 28 March 1962, showing that he successfully completed the minimum educational requirements for promotion to captain; a course completion certificate, dated 30 March 1962; a letter, dated 3 April 1962, showing that he completed the Field Artillery Battery Grade Extension Course; special orders, dated 10 February 1968, which reassigned him from FA to OD; a letter, dated 19 June 1979, which promoted him to lieutenant colonel as an OD officer; two documents showing that he completed the Command and General Staff Officer Course in 1978; and orders and a certificate showing that he was placed on the Army of the United States (AUS) Retired List on 30 December 1988 in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  After having had prior enlisted service, the applicant was commissioned a second lieutenant in the Army National Guard of the United States on 15 May 1955, and was assigned to the FA branch.  After being promoted to first lieutenant and captain as an FA officer, orders, dated 10 February 1968, reassigned him from the FA branch to the OD branch.  He was promoted to major effective 19 April 1972.  On 4 December 1978, he was honorably released from the Army National Guard, and was transferred to the United States Army Reserve.  He was promoted to lieutenant colonel in the OD branch effective 
18 April 1979.  On 30 December 1988, he was placed on the AUS Retired List in the rank of lieutenant colonel.  

3.  The applicant essentially stated that he was originally commissioned as an FA officer effective 15 May 1955, but that he was reassigned as an OD officer on 
10 February 1968 due to reorganization in his unit.  He also stated, in pertinent part, that no error or injustice is shown in his military records, but requests that his assigned branch be redesignated as FA because he prefers to be listed in his combat branch designation.  

4.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  This regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests that his assigned branch of OD at the time of his retirement be changed to FA, his originally assigned officer branch.

2.  While it is clear that the applicant was originally assigned to the FA branch when he was commissioned as an officer on 15 May 1955, the evidence of record clearly shows that he was transferred from FA branch to OD branch on
10 February 1968, and all documentation in his military record shows that OD was his branch from that date until he retired.  As the applicant pointed out, the fact that his military record shows that his branch at the time of his retirement was OD is not an error or injustice.  However, the fact that he now requests that his branch be changed from OD to FA because he would prefer to be listed in a combat branch designation is not a sufficiently compelling reason to change his branch.  

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting relief to the applicant in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__XXX __  __XXX__  __XXX__   DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___        XXX                ___
                CHAIRPERSON


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20070018291



4


DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
1901 SOUTH BELL STREET 2ND FLOOR
ARLINGTON, VA  22202-4508




Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006943

    Original file (20090006943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his foreign service in Vietnam and Thailand. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. This form further shows that at the time of his separation the applicant was assigned to the 590th Supply and Service Company, U.S. Army Pacific Command (USARPAC).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011681

    Original file (20120011681.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 January 1962, by letter, Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) notified him that he was considered for promotion to LTC by the 16 October 1961 DA USAR Selection Board, in accordance with Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers), but he was not selected for promotion. The letter informed him that: * This non-selection constituted his first non-selection and that he would be considered by the next...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002394

    Original file (20120002394.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 September 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120002394 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in Item 33 (Record of Assignments) the applicant: a. entered the basic combat training course at Fort Chafee, on 22 November 1955; b. entered advanced individual training at Fort Lewis, on 15 February 1956; c. was assigned to the 9th Infantry Regiment at Fort Lewis on 21 April 1956 with duty as an ammunition...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068215C070402

    Original file (2002068215C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He completed the Ordnance Corps Officer Candidate School (OCS) at Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland, and on 3 July 1943, was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army of the United States (AUS) Ordnance Corps and ordered to active duty at Headquarters, New York Port of Embarkation. On 14 April 1958, his file was reviewed at Headquarters, First United States Army (HQ, 1USA), for promotion to MAJ. His record shows : “Not Recommended” and “Not Fully Qualified” with the comment, “Has an...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050012152

    Original file (20050012152.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 March 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050012152 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. This is true, since he was promoted to Major on 1 July 1955 he should have been moved up one rank upon retirement. This is not true, as per the attached Certificate of Retirement from the Armed Forces he retired on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008110C070208

    Original file (20040008110C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests repayment of her student loans under the Student Loan Repayment Plan (SLRP) and payment of her enlistment bonus per her enlistment contract. The applicant states that after she enlisted, her bonus unit of assignment was deactivated and Soldiers were reassigned. Section III of the applicant's DA Form 5261-4-R (Student Loan Repayment Program Addendum) shows she contracted for assignment to the 8th Legal Support Organization, Team 3, Wichita, KS to serve in MOS 71D...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010914

    Original file (20100010914.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 December 1973, Headquarters, MOARNG, Office of the Adjutant General, published Special Orders Number 144 promoting him to SGM/E-9 under the authority of paragraph 3a of National Guard Regulation (NGR) 624-200 (Appointment and Reductions of Enlisted Personnel) effective 8 December 1973. The policy for grade determination for computation of retired pay required an enlisted member to serve in the higher grade for at least 185 days to qualify for retirement in that grade. However, 11 days...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016132

    Original file (20090016132.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record does not indicate the applicant completed any advanced courses to meet the military education requirement for promotion to MAJ. Table 2-2 of Army Regulation 135-155 (Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers) states CPTs must complete the officer advanced course to be eligible for promotion to MAJ. The available evidence does not support the applicant’s contention that he was kept...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011030C070206

    Original file (20050011030C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect that he was assigned to Company C, 1st Battalion, 508th Parachute Infantry Regiment (PIR), 82nd Airborne Division, 18th Airborne Corps instead of the unit currently reflected as “Co C, 1st Bn, 508th Infantry, 3d U.S. Army. His unit and the major command at the time are properly reflected on his DD Form 214 in accordance with the applicable regulation and the unit designations that were in effect at the time. Inasmuch...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052520C070420

    Original file (2001052520C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further states that his rank on his 21 September 1951 DD Form 214 is incorrect; that he was activated as a sergeant; that he served as a sergeant; and that he was discharged as a sergeant on 24 March 1946. On 24 March 1946, the applicant was discharged from the AUS in the rank of sergeant. On 24 March 1949, the applicant was discharged from the ERC in the rank of Corporal.