Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018005
Original file (20070018005.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  17 April 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070018005 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.




Director



Analyst
      The following members, a quorum, were present:




Chairperson



Member



Member
	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).



THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the effective date of his release from active duty, as shown on his DD Form 214, Report of Separation From Active Duty, be corrected.

2.  The applicant states that he missed all of his out-processing procedures, and he immediately joined the police department.  As such, nobody caught the error until he became employed by the U.S. Postal Service in 2006.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214, Orders 10-1123170 dated 26 October 1977 which discharged him from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), and Special Orders Number 238 dated 5 November 1974 which show the applicant was released from active duty on 7 November 1974 and transferred to the USAR Control Group the following day.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 8 November 1971, completed training to be a military policeman in January 1972, completed Basic Airborne training on 21 June 1972, and served the remainder of his enlistment assigned to a military police company located at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

3.  He was honorably released from active duty on 7 November 1974.  However, Item 9d of his DD Form 214, Effective Date, has 8 November 1971 entered.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows conclusively that the applicant was released from active duty on 7 November 1974.  As such, an error was obviously made when the effective date of the applicant’s separation was listed as 8 November 1971.

2.  As such, it would be appropriate to correct Item 9d of the applicant’s DD Form 214 to show he was released from active duty on 7 November 1974.

BOARD VOTE:

__JLP  __  __TSK__  __DWT__   GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that Item 9d of the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was released from active duty on 7 November 1974.




      ___        TSK                ___
                CHAIRPERSON

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20070018005



3


DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
1901 SOUTH BELL STREET 2ND FLOOR
ARLINGTON, VA  22202-4508




Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019242

    Original file (20080019242.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Forms 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be changed to show the dates "10 Nov 1971 to 6 April 1972" and from "6 April 1972 to 23 May 1977." The applicant's DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract, Armed Forces of the United States) shows he had honorable prior service in the U. S. Army from 6 April 1972 to 5 April 1974 and that on his release date he held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4. The applicant contends that his separation document does not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007740

    Original file (20100007740.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He was issued a DD Form 214 which shows, in Item 15, the date 17 January 1972. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to amending Item 15 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 16 October 1974 to show he entered on active duty on 17 January 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018200

    Original file (20100018200.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of item 4 (Date of Birth), items 6a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 6b (Pay Grade), and item 9d (Effective Date) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty). There is no evidence indicating the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for a change to the reason for his separation within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074067C070403

    Original file (2002074067C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, the DD Form 214 issued to him upon his discharge from the Army erroneously shows his effective date of discharge as 16 April 1971. On 24 January 1974, the request was approved by the appropriate authority who directed that the applicant be released from active (REFRAD) effective 16 April 1974. Item 9d (Effective Date) of the DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on the date of his REFRAD erroneously lists the date as 16 April 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014160

    Original file (20130014160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * the dates of entry and discharge are incorrect due to the fact that he served for 2 years from May 1972 to June 1974 * he served on active duty for a period of 2 years, yet his DD Form 214 shows his active duty time as 19 days * he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) during this enlistment, which is a questionable award for such a short tour of duty * he worked in the area of supply where he completed both basic and military occupational specialty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003300

    Original file (20140003300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows: * he entered active duty on 5 November 1974 * he was credited with 10 days of inactive service (USAR service from 24 October 1974 to 4 November 1974) * he completed 1 month and 15 days of active service * he was separated on 19 December 1974 5. There is no evidence of record showing he served on active duty after 19 December 1974. The evidence of record shows he enlisted in the RA on 5 November 1974 and he was discharged on 19 December 1974, which is properly shown...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018425

    Original file (20080018425.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his overseas service in the Republic of Vietnam. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant served overseas in Thailand from 4 August to on or about 28 November 1971 and in the Republic of Vietnam from 26 January 1972 to 24 November 1972. __________X_______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016486

    Original file (20100016486.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was issued a DD Form 214 which shows 23 January 1974 in item 9d (Effective Date). The regulation in effect at the time of his first term of enlistment stated a DD Form 214 would be prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 July 1968.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000687

    Original file (20140000687.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was actually discharged on 5 June 1979. Following approval of his voluntary request for unqualified resignation, he was honorably discharged on 4 April 1979 and appointed in the USAR on the same day. There is no evidence of record and he provided none to show he was serving on active duty through 5 June 1979.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003638C070206

    Original file (20050003638C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 9d (Effective Date/Year/Month/ Day) be corrected to show the entry "76 10 01' (1 October 1976) instead of the entry "76 09 27" (27 September 1976), that item 18a (Record of Service/Net Active Service This Period) be corrected to show the entry "02 00 00" (2 years) instead of the entry "01 11 26" (1 year, 11 months, and 26 days) and item 18c (Record of Service/Total Active Service) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation From Active Duty)...