Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015782
Original file (20070015782.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  
				  


	BOARD DATE:	  11 March 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070015782 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Mr. Mohammed R. Elhaj

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. Frank C. Jones, II

Chairperson

Ms. Carmen Duncan

Member

Mr. Scott W. Faught

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her Army of the United States Certificate of Service to show she was honorably released from active duty on 17 December 1945 instead of 17 December 1947.  

2.  The applicant states that the incorrect entry was due to a typographical error.  

3.  The applicant provided copies of her Certificate of Service, dated 17 December 1947 and WD AGO 53-98 (Military Record and Report of Separation Certificate of Service), dated 17 December 1945, in support of her application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case..

3.  The applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-98 shows that she entered active duty on 16 July 1945 as a second lieutenant (2LT) in the Army Nurse Corps (ANC).  She was honorably released under the provisions of War Department Readjustment Regulation 1-1 by reason of demobilization on 17 December 1945, at the Army Separation Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas.    

4.  Item 32 (Service Outside the United States) of the applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-90 shows the entry “None.”  Item 34 (Current Tour of Active Duty-Continental Service) shows the entry 5 months and 2 days. 

5.  The applicant’s Form SG-23, shows that the applicant was appointed as a 2LT on 16 July 1945.  This form also shows that the applicant was attached, unassigned, to Fort Devens, Massachusetts, on 30 June 1945, and that on 17 December 1945, she reverted to inactive status in accordance with paragraph 20 of Special Orders Number 345, Headquarters, War Department Pacific Command, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, dated 11 December 1945 (demobilization).  

6.  The applicant’s Army of the United States Certificate of Service, shows that the applicant honorably served in the Army of the United States from 16 July 1945 to 17 December 1947.   

7.  During World War II (WWII), demobilization was expected to fall into two phases: Period I, the interval between the surrender in Europe and the termination of hostilities in the Orient; and Period II, the final transition to a peacetime basis.  The War Department published and issued the Readjustment Regulation 1-1 on 30 August 1944.  However, by the spring of 1945, the categories for demobilization had been changed to four categories: (1) units scheduled for direct redeployment to another theater; (2) units scheduled for redeployment through the United States; (3) units to be assigned to the occupation air force; and (4) surplus units and personnel scheduled for return to the United States for inactivation or separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Evidence of record shows that the applicant was released from active duty and reverted to inactive status on 17 December 1945.  It appears that her Army of the United States Certificate of Service inadvertently showed she was honorably released from active duty on 17 December 1947 instead of 17 December 1945.  

2.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant is entitled to correction of her Army of the United States Certificate of Service to show that she was honorably released from active duty on 17 December 1945 instead of 17 December 1947.  




BOARD VOTE:

__fcj___  __cd____  __swf___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by issuing the applicant an appropriate document to show that she served from
16 July 1945 to 17 December 1945.



							Frank C. Jones, II
	______________________
          		CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001361C070206

    Original file (20050001361C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the daughter of a World War II former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that her father be awarded the Purple Heart. The evidence shows that the FSM did not serve outside the Continental United States while he served in World War II. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by adding the World War II Victory Medal to the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001361C070206

    Original file (20050001361C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the daughter of a World War II former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that her father be awarded the Purple Heart. The evidence shows that the FSM did not serve outside the Continental United States while he served in World War II. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by adding the World War II Victory Medal to the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087140C070212

    Original file (2003087140C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1 also shows the 501st Parachute Infantry Regiment was cited for award of the Netherlands Orange Lanyard for the period 17 September to 28 November 1944; the French Croix de Guerre for the period 6 to 8 June 1944; and the Belgian Fourragere for action on 6 June 1944 based on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072901C070403

    Original file (2002072901C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was appointed to the grade of 1 st lieutenant in the Army Nurse Corps effective 13 December 1945. It would be appropriate therefore to correct her record and reflect her grade as 1 st lieutenant on her Certificate of Service. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was promoted to the grade of 1 st lieutenant on 13 December 1945.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087597C070212

    Original file (2003087597C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation) of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show his marital status as married. The applicant states that she and the FSM were married at the time of his separation from the Army. The evidence provided by the applicant shows that she and the FSM were married when he separated from the Army on 5 September 1945.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040006358C070208

    Original file (040006358C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Although legislation did authorize award of the Purple Heart to former prisoners of war, as indicated above, there must be substantiating evidence to show that a POW was wounded as a result of hostile action. The evidence shows that the applicant’s record contains administrative error that does not require action by the Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091312C070212

    Original file (2003091312C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    PROCEEDINGS BOARD DATE: 21 OCTOBER 2003 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003091312 The Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Register shows that the 40th Tank Battalion was awarded the Belgian Fourragere for its actions from 16 December 1944 to 31 December 1944, and from 20 January 1945 to 29 January 1945. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 10 September 1944, and by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079505C070215

    Original file (2002079505C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 31 (Military Qualification and Date) the applicant's discharge document shows award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board determined that the applicant was entitled to award of the Good Conduct Medal for his service from 15 February 1943 through 29 January 1946 based on completion of a period of service of more than one year but less than three years served entirely between 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010750

    Original file (20070010750.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) for review. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show award of the World War II Victory Medal, and the Bronze Star Medal based on award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007528C070205

    Original file (20060007528C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star Medal...