Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015182
Original file (20070015182.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  26 February 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070015182 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Mr. Mohammed R. Elhaj

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. Linda D. Simmons

Chairperson

Ms. LaVerne M. Douglas

Member

Mr. John G. Heck

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant states that he served honorably and received several commendations during his military service.  He also states that he served as a driver for the Commanding General, 1st Cavalry Division, from July 1963 until he was discharged. 

3.  The applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 12 August 1963 in support of his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 September 1960 for a period of 3 years.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 643.10 (Truckmaster).  The highest grade he attained during his military service was sergeant (SGT)/E-5.  He was honorably separated and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) on 12 August 1963.

3.  The applicant’s records show that he served in the Republic of Korea from 4 August 1962 to 26 July 1963.  He was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Cavalry Division.  



4.  Item 24 (Decoration, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine Bar.  Item 24 does not show award of the Good Conduct Medal.  

5.  The applicant’s records do not contain orders awarding him the Good Conduct Medal.

6.  Section 4 of the applicant's DA Form 24 (Service Records) shows that the applicant had all “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service.  and no convictions by a court-martial.  Ratings of "Unknown" for portions of the period under consideration are not disqualifying.  Service and efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "Good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 are not disqualifying.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.  

8.  Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.  Ratings of "Unknown" for portions of the period under consideration are not disqualifying.  Service and efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "Good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 are not disqualifying.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

Evidence of record confirms that the applicant served honorably during the period 7 September 1960 to 12 August 1963 and received conduct and efficiency rating of excellent.  Lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show award of the Good Conduct Medal and to correction of his records to show this award.  

BOARD VOTE:

__lds___  __lmd___  __jgh___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 7 September 1960 to 12 August 1963 and showing award of the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) on his records.




						Linda D. Simmons
______________________
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015024

    Original file (20070015024.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 February 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070015024 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014523

    Original file (20070014523.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant also submitted a copy of Headquarters, United States Army Military Assistance Command-Vietnam, Army Advisory Group, certificate showing he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for distinguishing himself by meritorious service in connection with military operations against a hostile force in the Republic of Vietnam, during the period March 1972 to February 1973. Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007198

    Original file (20090007198.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Good Conduct Medal and correct his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005843

    Original file (20080005843.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014695

    Original file (20070014695.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    For Vietnam service, one Overseas Service Bar is authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973. The evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period in the Republic of Vietnam for award of one Overseas Service Bar. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Combat Infantryman Badge for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007837

    Original file (20070007837.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he received combat wounds and by awarding him the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. granting the applicant the Good Conduct Medal for his period of service from 9 July 1969 through 16 April 1971; and b. showing that, in addition to the awards listed on the DD Form 214, the applicant is also authorized award of the Republic of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064436C070421

    Original file (2001064436C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant’s records which show he was awarded the Good Conduct Medal. The applicant’s DD Form 214, with an effective date of 16 September 1966, shows entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was recommended for or awarded the Good Conduct Medal during his first period of eligibility (20 September 1961 through 20 September 1964).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000580C070206

    Original file (20050000580C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 October 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050000580 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Kenneth W. Lapin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018119

    Original file (20100018119.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate to approve award of the Army Good Conduct Medal to the applicant and correct his records. The evidence of record shows the applicant qualified for award of the National Defense Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for exemplary conduct, efficiency, and fidelity from 21...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016748

    Original file (20140016748.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. There are no orders or any other evidence that shows he was awarded or recommended for the Army Good Conduct Medal. The Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on...